Davies Tazman, Coyle Daisy, Shahid Maria, Pettigrew Simone, Wu Jason Hy, Marklund Matti
The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Appetite. 2023 Jan 1;180:106352. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106352. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
We examined the prevalence and magnitude of price promotions among purchases of packaged foods and beverages in Australia, as well as the contribution of price-promoted foods and beverages to apparent energy intake. We utilized grocery purchase data from a nationally representative panel of 10 000 households in 2019 (NielsenIQ Homescan panel), combined with a food nutrition dataset (FoodSwitch). Nutritional quality was defined using the Australian and New Zealand Health Star Rating (HSR), where products with an HSR <3.5 were classified as 'less healthy' and products with an HSR ≥3.5 were classified as 'healthy'. Apparent energy intake was expressed as the total energy content of all purchased products per day per capita. Price promotions were claimed by panel members. Overall, four-in-ten packaged products (41%) were purchased on price promotion. Compared to 'healthy' products, 'less healthy' products were more frequently purchased on price promotion (33% vs 48%, respectively, p < 0.001), but had a similar mean magnitude of price discount (both 22%). Low socio-economic status (SES) households consumed 18% more energy from 'less healthy' packaged products on price promotion than high SES households (1141 vs 970 kJ/day/capita, p < 0.001). In conclusion, restricting price promotions for 'less healthy' packaged foods and beverages could potentially improve diet quality and dietary inequalities in Australia.
我们研究了澳大利亚包装食品和饮料购买中价格促销的流行程度和幅度,以及价格促销的食品和饮料对表观能量摄入的贡献。我们利用了2019年来自全国10000户具有代表性家庭的食品杂货购买数据(尼尔森IQ家庭扫描面板),并结合了一个食品营养数据集(FoodSwitch)。营养质量使用澳大利亚和新西兰健康星级评定(HSR)来定义,其中HSR<3.5的产品被归类为“健康程度较低”,HSR≥3.5的产品被归类为“健康”。表观能量摄入表示为每人每天购买的所有产品的总能量含量。价格促销由面板成员申报。总体而言,十分之四的包装产品(41%)是在价格促销时购买的。与“健康”产品相比,“健康程度较低”的产品在价格促销时购买频率更高(分别为33%和48%,p<0.001),但平均价格折扣幅度相似(均为22%)。社会经济地位(SES)较低的家庭从价格促销的“健康程度较低”包装产品中摄入的能量比SES较高的家庭多18%(1141 vs 970千焦/天/人,p<0.001)。总之,限制“健康程度较低”包装食品和饮料的价格促销可能会改善澳大利亚的饮食质量和饮食不平等状况。