Carolina Population Center, Dept. of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 137 E Franklin St, CB #8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Carolina Population Center, Dept. of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 137 E Franklin St, CB #8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
This study examines trends in the prevalence of price promotions among packaged food and beverage purchases, differences in prevalence by household race/ethnicity or income, and the association between price promotions and the nutritional profile of purchases.
This cross-sectional study utilizes a dataset of 90 million purchases from 38,744 (2008) to 45,042 (2012) US households in 2008-2012. Chi-square tests were used to examine whether the proportion of purchases with price promotions changed over time or differed by household race/ethnicity or income. T-tests were used to compare purchased products' nutritional profiles.
Prevalence of price promotions among packaged food and beverage purchases increased by 8% and 6%, respectively, from 2008 to 2012, with both reaching 34% by 2012. Higher-income households had greater proportions of purchases with price promotions than lower-income households. Asian households had the highest proportion of purchases with any price promotion, followed by non-Hispanic whites. While total price-promoted packaged food purchases had higher mean energy, total sugar, and saturated fat densities than purchases with no price promotions, absolute differences were small.
Prevalence of price promotions among US household purchases increased from 2008 to 2012 and was greater for higher-income households. No clear associations emerged between presence of price promotions and nutritional quality of purchases.
本研究考察了包装食品和饮料购买中价格促销的流行趋势、家庭种族/民族或收入差异以及价格促销与购买营养状况之间的关联。
本横断面研究利用了 2008 年至 2012 年间美国 38744(2008 年)至 45042(2012 年)户家庭的 9000 万次购买数据。卡方检验用于检验价格促销购买比例是否随时间变化或家庭种族/民族或收入差异而有所不同。T 检验用于比较购买产品的营养状况。
从 2008 年到 2012 年,包装食品和饮料购买中的价格促销比例分别增加了 8%和 6%,到 2012 年分别达到 34%。高收入家庭的价格促销购买比例高于低收入家庭。亚裔家庭的任何价格促销购买比例最高,其次是非西班牙裔白人。虽然促销包装食品的总能量、总糖和饱和脂肪密度高于无促销购买,但绝对差异较小。
从 2008 年到 2012 年,美国家庭购买中的价格促销比例有所增加,高收入家庭的比例更高。价格促销的存在与购买的营养质量之间没有明显的关联。