• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Deal or no deal? The prevalence and nutritional quality of price promotions among U.S. food and beverage purchases.成交还是不成交?美国食品和饮料购买中价格促销的流行程度和营养质量。
Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
2
Trends in racial/ethnic and income disparities in foods and beverages consumed and purchased from stores among US households with children, 2000-2013.2000 - 2013年美国家庭中有孩子的家庭在从商店消费和购买的食品及饮料方面的种族/族裔和收入差距趋势。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep;104(3):750-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127944. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
3
No Fat, No Sugar, No Salt . . . No Problem? Prevalence of "Low-Content" Nutrient Claims and Their Associations with the Nutritional Profile of Food and Beverage Purchases in the United States.无脂肪、无糖分、无盐分……没问题?美国“低含量”营养声明的流行情况及其与食品饮料购买营养成分的关联
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Sep;117(9):1366-1374.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Do purchases of price promoted and generic branded foods and beverages vary according to food category and income level? Evidence from a consumer research panel.促销价格的购买和通用品牌的食品和饮料是否因食品类别和收入水平而异?来自消费者研究小组的证据。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5
Highly Processed and Ready-to-Eat Packaged Food and Beverage Purchases Differ by Race/Ethnicity among US Households.美国不同种族/族裔家庭购买的高度加工即食包装食品和饮料存在差异。
J Nutr. 2016 Sep;146(9):1722-30. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.230441. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.补充营养援助计划家庭食品和饮料购买的营养状况
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1433-1442. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.147173. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Where people shop is not associated with the nutrient quality of packaged foods for any racial-ethnic group in the United States.在美国,对于任何种族或族裔群体而言,人们的购物地点与包装食品的营养质量并无关联。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):1125-34. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.121806. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and racial/ethnic disparities in food and beverage purchases.补充营养援助计划参与度与食品和饮料购买方面的种族/民族差异。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3377-3385. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002598. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Nutritional Profile of Purchases by Store Type: Disparities by Income and Food Program Participation.按商店类型划分的购买品的营养状况:收入和食品计划参与情况的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Mexican Households' Purchases of Foods and Beverages Vary by Store-Type, Taxation Status, and SES.墨西哥家庭对食品和饮料的购买因商店类型、税收状况和社会经济地位而异。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 8;10(8):1044. doi: 10.3390/nu10081044.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Geographic Location: A Scoping Review of U.S. Consumer Food Purchasing.理解种族/民族、社会经济地位和地理位置的交集:美国消费者食品购买情况的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207677.
2
Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.食品和饮料公司对零售商营销策略和消费者行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;17(20):7381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207381.
3
A systematic review, and meta-analysis, examining the prevalence of price promotions on foods and whether they are more likely to be found on less-healthy foods.一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究了食品价格促销的流行情况,以及它们是否更有可能出现在不太健康的食品上。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jun;23(8):1281-1296. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004129. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
4
Measuring the Power of Food Marketing to Children: a Review of Recent Literature.测量食品营销对儿童的影响力:近期文献综述。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):323-332. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00292-2.
5
Food and Beverage Price Promotions: an Untapped Policy Target for Improving Population Diets and Health.食品和饮料价格促销:改善人群饮食和健康的未开发政策目标。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Sep;8(3):250-255. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00287-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Price promotions for food and beverage products in a nationwide sample of food stores.全国范围内食品店样本中食品和饮料产品的价格促销活动。
Prev Med. 2016 May;86:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
2
Global growth of "big box" stores and the potential impact on human health and nutrition.“大型商店”的全球增长及其对人类健康和营养的潜在影响。
Nutr Rev. 2016 Feb;74(2):83-97. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv062. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
Online grocery store coupons and unhealthy foods, United States.美国的网上杂货店优惠券与不健康食品
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 9;11:130211. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130211.
4
Retail grocery store marketing strategies and obesity: an integrative review.零售杂货店营销策略与肥胖:综合述评。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.013.
5
Interventions in small food stores to change the food environment, improve diet, and reduce risk of chronic disease.小食品店干预措施以改变食品环境、改善饮食、降低慢性病风险。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E59. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
6
Consumer food choices: the role of price and pricing strategies.消费者的食物选择:价格和定价策略的作用。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Dec;14(12):2220-6. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001637. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
Do effects of price discounts and nutrition education on food purchases vary by ethnicity, income and education? Results from a randomised, controlled trial.价格折扣和营养教育对食品购买的影响是否因种族、收入和教育程度而异?一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Oct;65(10):902-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.118588. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
8
Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households.定向饮料税对高收入和低收入家庭的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Dec 13;170(22):2028-34. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.449.
9
The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study.税收和补贴对实验性购买研究中购买能源的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):406-14. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361446. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
10
Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial.价格折扣和定制营养教育对超市购买行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):736-47. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28742. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

成交还是不成交?美国食品和饮料购买中价格促销的流行程度和营养质量。

Deal or no deal? The prevalence and nutritional quality of price promotions among U.S. food and beverage purchases.

机构信息

Carolina Population Center, Dept. of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 137 E Franklin St, CB #8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.

Carolina Population Center, Dept. of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 137 E Franklin St, CB #8120, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.006
PMID:28705473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5574185/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines trends in the prevalence of price promotions among packaged food and beverage purchases, differences in prevalence by household race/ethnicity or income, and the association between price promotions and the nutritional profile of purchases.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study utilizes a dataset of 90 million purchases from 38,744 (2008) to 45,042 (2012) US households in 2008-2012. Chi-square tests were used to examine whether the proportion of purchases with price promotions changed over time or differed by household race/ethnicity or income. T-tests were used to compare purchased products' nutritional profiles.

RESULTS

Prevalence of price promotions among packaged food and beverage purchases increased by 8% and 6%, respectively, from 2008 to 2012, with both reaching 34% by 2012. Higher-income households had greater proportions of purchases with price promotions than lower-income households. Asian households had the highest proportion of purchases with any price promotion, followed by non-Hispanic whites. While total price-promoted packaged food purchases had higher mean energy, total sugar, and saturated fat densities than purchases with no price promotions, absolute differences were small.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of price promotions among US household purchases increased from 2008 to 2012 and was greater for higher-income households. No clear associations emerged between presence of price promotions and nutritional quality of purchases.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了包装食品和饮料购买中价格促销的流行趋势、家庭种族/民族或收入差异以及价格促销与购买营养状况之间的关联。

设计

本横断面研究利用了 2008 年至 2012 年间美国 38744(2008 年)至 45042(2012 年)户家庭的 9000 万次购买数据。卡方检验用于检验价格促销购买比例是否随时间变化或家庭种族/民族或收入差异而有所不同。T 检验用于比较购买产品的营养状况。

结果

从 2008 年到 2012 年,包装食品和饮料购买中的价格促销比例分别增加了 8%和 6%,到 2012 年分别达到 34%。高收入家庭的价格促销购买比例高于低收入家庭。亚裔家庭的任何价格促销购买比例最高,其次是非西班牙裔白人。虽然促销包装食品的总能量、总糖和饱和脂肪密度高于无促销购买,但绝对差异较小。

结论

从 2008 年到 2012 年,美国家庭购买中的价格促销比例有所增加,高收入家庭的比例更高。价格促销的存在与购买的营养质量之间没有明显的关联。