The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 23;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00982-z.
The Australian federal government will soon release voluntary sodium reduction targets for 30 packaged food categories through the Healthy Food Partnership. Previous assessments of voluntary targets show variable industry engagement, and little is known about the extent that major food companies and their products contribute to dietary sodium purchases among Australian households.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify the relative contribution that food companies and their products made to Australian household sodium purchases in 2018, and to examine differences in sodium purchases by household income level. We used 1 year of grocery purchase data from a nationally representative consumer panel of Australian households who reported their grocery purchases (the Nielsen Homescan panel), combined with database that contains product-specific sodium content for packaged foods and beverages (FoodSwitch). The top food companies and food categories were ranked according to their contribution to household sodium purchases. Differences in per capita sodium purchases by income levels were assessed by 1-factor ANOVA. All analyses were modelled to the Australian population in 2018 using sample weights.
Sodium data were available from 7188 households who purchased 26,728 unique products and purchased just under 7.5 million food product units. Out of 1329 food companies, the top 10 accounted for 35% of unique products and contributed to 58% of all sodium purchased from packaged foods and beverages. The top three companies were grocery food retailers each contributing 12-15% of sodium purchases from sales of their private label products, particularly processed meat, cheese and bread. Out of the 67 food categories, the top 10 accounted for 73% of sodium purchased, particularly driven by purchases of processed meat (14%), bread (12%) and sauces (11%). Low-income Australian households purchased significantly more sodium from packaged products than high-income households per capita (452 mg/d, 95%CI: 363-540 mg/d, P < 0.001).
A small number of food companies and food categories account for most of the dietary sodium purchased by Australian households. Prioritizing government engagement with these groups could deliver a large reduction in population sodium intake.
澳大利亚联邦政府即将通过健康食品伙伴关系发布 30 个包装食品类别的自愿减钠目标。先前对自愿目标的评估显示,行业参与情况各不相同,对于主要食品公司及其产品在多大程度上导致澳大利亚家庭购买的食物中钠含量过高,人们知之甚少。
本横断面研究的目的是确定 2018 年食品公司及其产品对澳大利亚家庭钠购买量的相对贡献,并研究家庭收入水平差异对钠购买量的影响。我们使用了来自澳大利亚家庭全国代表性消费者小组的一年杂货购买数据,该小组报告了他们的杂货购买情况(尼尔森家庭扫描小组),并结合了包含包装食品和饮料中特定产品钠含量的数据库(FoodSwitch)。根据对家庭钠购买量的贡献对顶级食品公司和食品类别进行排名。通过单因素方差分析评估不同收入水平的人均钠购买量差异。所有分析均采用样本权重针对 2018 年的澳大利亚人口进行建模。
有 7188 户家庭提供了钠数据,这些家庭购买了 26728 种不同产品,购买了近 750 万个食品产品单位。在 1329 家食品公司中,排名前 10 的公司占独特产品的 35%,占包装食品和饮料中所有购买的钠的 58%。前 3 家公司均为杂货店食品零售商,每家公司通过销售自有品牌产品贡献了 12-15%的钠购买量,特别是加工肉类、奶酪和面包。在 67 个食品类别中,排名前 10 的类别占购买的钠的 73%,主要是由于购买加工肉类(14%)、面包(12%)和酱汁(11%)。低收入澳大利亚家庭的人均购买包装产品中的钠量明显高于高收入家庭(452mg/d,95%CI:363-540mg/d,P<0.001)。
少数食品公司和食品类别占澳大利亚家庭购买的大部分膳食钠。优先考虑政府与这些群体的合作,可能会大幅降低人群的钠摄入量。