Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚超加工食品购买的社会经济差异:一项全国代表性家庭食品杂货购买面板分析。

Socio-economic difference in purchases of ultra-processed foods in Australia: an analysis of a nationally representative household grocery purchasing panel.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Dec 12;19(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01389-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with increased risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases. Little is known about current patterns of ultra-processed foods intake in Australia. The aim of this study was to examine the amount and type of ultra-processed foods purchased by Australian households in 2019 and determine whether purchases differed by socio-economic status (SES). We also assessed whether purchases of ultra-processed foods changed between 2015 and 2019.  METHODS: We used grocery purchase data from a nationally representative consumer panel in Australia to assess packaged and unpackaged grocery purchases that were brought home between 2015 to 2019. Ultra-processed foods were identified according to the NOVA system, which classifies foods according to the nature, extent and purpose of industrial food processing. Purchases of ultra-processed foods were calculated per capita, using two outcomes: grams/day and percent of total energy. The top food categories contributing to purchases of ultra-processed foods in 2019 were identified, and differences in ultra-processed food purchases by SES (Index of Relative Social Advantage and Disadvantage) were assessed using survey-weighted linear regression. Changes in purchases of ultra-processed foods between 2015 to 2019 were examined overall and by SES using mixed linear models.

RESULTS

In 2019, the mean ± SD total grocery purchases made by Australian households was 881.1 ± 511.9 g/d per capita. Of this, 424.2 ± 319.0 g/d per capita was attributable to purchases of ultra-processed foods, which represented 56.4% of total energy purchased. The largest food categories contributing to total energy purchased included mass-produced, packaged breads (8.2% of total energy purchased), chocolate and sweets (5.7%), biscuits and crackers (5.7%) and ice-cream and edible ices (4.3%). In 2019, purchases of ultra-processed foods were significantly higher for the lowest SES households compared to all other SES quintiles (P < 0.001). There were no major changes in purchases of ultra-processed foods overall or by SES over the five-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2015 and 2019, ultra-processed foods have consistently made up the majority of groceries purchased by Australians, particularly for the lowest SES households. Policies that reduce ultra-processed food consumption may reduce diet-related health inequalities.

摘要

背景

消费超加工食品与肥胖和非传染性疾病风险增加有关。目前,澳大利亚超加工食品的摄入模式知之甚少。本研究旨在检查 2019 年澳大利亚家庭购买的超加工食品的数量和类型,并确定购买量是否因社会经济地位 (SES) 而异。我们还评估了 2015 年至 2019 年间超加工食品购买量的变化。

方法

我们使用澳大利亚全国代表性消费者小组的杂货购买数据,评估 2015 年至 2019 年间带回家的包装和未包装的杂货购买情况。根据 NOVA 系统识别超加工食品,该系统根据工业食品加工的性质、程度和目的对食品进行分类。使用两种结果(克/天和总能量的百分比),按人均计算超加工食品的购买量。确定了 2019 年超加工食品购买量最大的食品类别,并使用调查加权线性回归评估 SES(相对社会优势和劣势指数)差异对超加工食品购买量的影响。使用混合线性模型总体和按 SES 检查 2015 年至 2019 年超加工食品购买量的变化。

结果

2019 年,澳大利亚家庭人均杂货总购买量的平均值±SD 为 881.1±511.9 克/天。其中,424.2±319.0 克/天归因于超加工食品的购买,占总能量购买量的 56.4%。对总能量购买量贡献最大的食品类别包括批量生产的包装面包(占总能量购买量的 8.2%)、巧克力和糖果(5.7%)、饼干和薄脆饼干(5.7%)以及冰淇淋和可食用冰(4.3%)。2019 年,最低 SES 家庭购买的超加工食品明显高于所有其他 SES 五分位数家庭(P<0.001)。在五年期间,超加工食品的购买量总体或按 SES 均无重大变化。

结论

在 2015 年至 2019 年期间,超加工食品一直占澳大利亚人购买食品的大部分,特别是对最低 SES 家庭而言。减少超加工食品消费的政策可能会减少与饮食相关的健康不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6434/9743700/83224661c7d4/12966_2022_1389_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
The Contribution of Major Food Categories and Companies to Household Purchases of Added Sugar in Australia.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;122(2):345-353.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Processing level and diet quality of the US grocery cart: is there an association?
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Sep;22(13):2357-2366. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001344. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
Contribution of major food companies and their products to household dietary sodium purchases in Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 23;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00982-z.
5
Added sugars and ultra-processed foods in Spanish households (1990-2010).
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct;72(10):1404-1412. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0039-0. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households?
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;101(6):1251-62. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100925. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Social determinants of household food expenditure in Australia: the role of education, income, geography and time.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):902-911. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003342. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Estimating the potential impact of the Australian government's reformulation targets on household sugar purchases.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 28;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01208-6.

引用本文的文献

2
Ultra-processed food consumption in the central division of Fiji.
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03947-w.
3
Using a systems thinking approach to map the global rise of ultra-processed foods in population diets.
Obes Rev. 2025 Apr;26(4):e13877. doi: 10.1111/obr.13877. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and dental caries in Brazilian adolescents.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75813-3.
5
Ultraprocessed food (UPF), health, and mechanistic uncertainty: What should we be advising the public to do about UPFs?
PLoS Med. 2024 Oct 15;21(10):e1004439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004439. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Modifying the Health Star Rating nutrient profiling algorithm to account for ultra-processing.
Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;82(1):53-63. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12892. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Ultra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system?
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Sep;76(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01099-1. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Beyond food swamps and food deserts: exploring urban Australian food retail environment typologies.
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jan 13;25(5):1-13. doi: 10.1017/S136898002200009X.
4
Estimating the potential impact of the Australian government's reformulation targets on household sugar purchases.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 28;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01208-6.
5
The estimated health impact of sodium reduction through food reformulation in Australia: A modeling study.
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 26;18(10):e1003806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003806. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;115(1):211-221. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab305.
8
Ultra-processed food consumption, socio-demographics and diet quality in Australian adults.
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jan;25(1):94-104. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003967. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
The Contribution of Major Food Categories and Companies to Household Purchases of Added Sugar in Australia.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;122(2):345-353.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Estimating the potential impact of Australia's reformulation programme on households' sodium purchases.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021 Jan 12;4(1):49-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000173. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验