Suppr超能文献

加纳中部农村家庭使用清洁燃料的可行性与可接受性:一项试点研究

The feasibility and acceptability of clean fuel use among rural households. A pilot study in Central Ghana.

作者信息

Tawiah Theresa, Iddrisu Seidu, Gyaase Stephanie, Twumasi Mieks, Asante Kwaku Poku, Jack Darby

机构信息

Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality, Ghana.

Columbia University, NY, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Afr. 2022 Sep 12;13(3):2205. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.2205. eCollection 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

76% of the population in Ghana uses solid fuels as their primary source of cooking energy, including 41.3% firewood and 31.5% charcoal. Consequently, household air pollution (HAP) continues to be the leading risk factor for the majority of illness burden in the country. In the past, aggressive LPG distribution and adoption schemes have been implemented to reduce HAP in Ghana. Nevertheless, just 22% of Ghanaian households utilize LPG for cooking.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the viability and acceptability of four clean fuels among rural households in central Ghana, both separately and in combination.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to conduct this study. The Kintampo Health Demographic Surveillance System was used to randomly pick ten homes who exclusively utilized biomass fuel. For each family (n = 10), we gave four stove and fuel combinations that were both clean. The stoves were utilized for two weeks, and free fuel was supplied. After each two-week trial period, interviews were conducted to gauge stove acceptance, with an emphasis on finding the specific energy requirements that each stove satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

LPG and ethanol stoves were the most popular among rural families, according to our data. In comparison to Mimi Moto and electric induction stoves, the two stoves were favoured because they were easier to use and clean, cooked faster, were deemed safer, and enabled a variety of cooking styles. Participants' stove preferences appear to be primarily influenced by two domains: 1) realizing the benefits of clean stove technology and 2) overcoming early anxiety of clean stove use, particularly LPG.

摘要

背景

加纳76%的人口将固体燃料作为主要烹饪能源,其中41.3%使用木柴,31.5%使用木炭。因此,家庭空气污染(HAP)仍然是该国大多数疾病负担的主要风险因素。过去,加纳实施了积极的液化石油气(LPG)推广和采用计划,以减少家庭空气污染。然而,只有22%的加纳家庭使用LPG做饭。

目的

本研究的目的是确定加纳中部农村家庭单独使用和组合使用四种清洁燃料的可行性和可接受性。

方法

采用定量和定性方法进行本研究。利用金坦波健康人口监测系统随机挑选了10户仅使用生物质燃料的家庭。对于每个家庭(n = 10),我们提供了四种清洁的炉灶和燃料组合。这些炉灶使用了两周,并提供免费燃料。在每两周的试验期结束后,进行访谈以评估炉灶的可接受性,重点是找出每个炉灶满足的具体能源需求。

结论

根据我们的数据,LPG炉灶和乙醇炉灶在农村家庭中最受欢迎。与咪咪摩托炉灶和电磁感应炉灶相比,这两种炉灶更受青睐,因为它们使用和清洁起来更方便,烹饪速度更快,被认为更安全,并且能实现多种烹饪方式。参与者对炉灶的偏好似乎主要受两个方面影响:1)认识到清洁炉灶技术的好处;2)克服对使用清洁炉灶,尤其是LPG炉灶的早期担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f468/9585603/20087a0ea7fa/jpha-13-3-2205-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The feasibility and acceptability of clean fuel use among rural households. A pilot study in Central Ghana.
J Public Health Afr. 2022 Sep 12;13(3):2205. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.2205. eCollection 2022 Sep 7.
5
Government Policy, Clean Fuel Access, and Persistent Fuel Stacking in Ecuador.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
Real-life effectiveness of 'improved' stoves and clean fuels in reducing PM and CO: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Environ Int. 2017 Apr;101:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
8
Long-standing LPG subsidies, cooking fuel stacking, and personal exposure to air pollution in rural and peri-urban Ecuador.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;30(4):707-720. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0231-5. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Impacts of stove/fuel use and outdoor air pollution on chemical composition of household particulate matter.
Indoor Air. 2020 Mar;30(2):294-305. doi: 10.1111/ina.12636. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of improved cook stoves-a scoping review of the literature.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):e0004042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004042. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Beyond cost: Exploring fuel choices and the socio-cultural dynamics of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption in Peru.
Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020 Aug;66. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101591. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
Ghana's Rural Liquefied Petroleum Gas Program Scale Up: A case study.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
4
Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions.
Energy Policy. 2020 Jun;141. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Long-standing LPG subsidies, cooking fuel stacking, and personal exposure to air pollution in rural and peri-urban Ecuador.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;30(4):707-720. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0231-5. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Solid fuel use and early child development disparities in Ghana: analyses by gender and urbanicity.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;30(4):698-706. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0224-4. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Household fuel use and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Ghanaian cohort study.
Reprod Health. 2020 Feb 22;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0878-3.
9
Determining the Enablers and Barriers for the Adoption of Clean Cookstoves in the Middle Belt of Ghana-A Qualitative Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 4;16(7):1207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071207.
10
Government Policy, Clean Fuel Access, and Persistent Fuel Stacking in Ecuador.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验