Suppr超能文献

人人参与:家庭能源案例研究的经验教训,为清洁能源转型提供设计原则参考。

Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions.

作者信息

Shankar Anita V, Quinn Ashlinn, Dickinson Katherine L, Williams Kendra N, Masera Omar, Charron Dana, Jack Darby, Hyman Jasmine, Pillarisetti Ajay, Bailis Rob, Kumar Praveen, Ruiz-Mercado Ilse, Rosenthal Joshua

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Energy Policy. 2020 Jun;141. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

Abstract

Stove stacking (concurrent use of multiple stoves and/or fuels) is a poorly quantified practice in regions where efforts to transition household energy to cleaner stoves/or fuels are on-going. Using biomass-burning stoves alongside clean stoves undermines health and environmental goals. This review synthesizes stove stacking data gathered from eleven case studies of clean cooking programs in low/middle-income country settings. Analyzed data are from ministry and program records, research studies, and informant interviews. Thematic analysis identify key drivers of stove stacking behavior in each setting. Significant (28%-100%) stacking with traditional cooking methods was observed in all cases. Reason for traditional fuel use includes: costs of clean fuel; mismatches between cooking technologies and household needs; and unreliable fuel supply. National household surveys often focus on 'primary' cookstoves and miss stove stacking data. Thus more attention should be paid to discontinuation of traditional stove use, not solely adoption of cleaner stoves/fuels. Future energy policies and programs should acknowledge the realities of stacking and incorporate strategies at the design stage to transition away from polluting stoves/fuels. Seven principles for clean cooking system program design and policy are presented, focused on a shift toward "cleaner stacking" that could yield household air pollution reductions approaching WHO targets.

摘要

炉灶叠加使用(同时使用多个炉灶和/或燃料)在那些正在努力将家庭能源转换为更清洁炉灶/燃料的地区是一种量化不足的做法。将生物质燃烧炉灶与清洁炉灶一起使用会破坏健康和环境目标。本综述综合了从低收入/中等收入国家环境下的11个清洁烹饪项目案例研究中收集到的炉灶叠加使用数据。分析的数据来自政府部门和项目记录、研究以及信息提供者访谈。主题分析确定了每种环境下炉灶叠加使用行为的关键驱动因素。在所有案例中都观察到与传统烹饪方法存在显著的(28%-100%)叠加使用情况。使用传统燃料的原因包括:清洁燃料的成本;烹饪技术与家庭需求不匹配;以及燃料供应不可靠。国家家庭调查通常关注“主要”炉灶,而遗漏了炉灶叠加使用数据。因此,应更多地关注传统炉灶使用的停止,而不仅仅是采用更清洁的炉灶/燃料。未来的能源政策和项目应承认叠加使用的现实情况,并在设计阶段纳入相关策略,以逐步淘汰污染性炉灶/燃料。本文提出了清洁烹饪系统项目设计和政策的七条原则,重点是向“更清洁的叠加使用”转变,这有望使家庭空气污染减少接近世界卫生组织的目标。

相似文献

1
Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions.
Energy Policy. 2020 Jun;141. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Real-life effectiveness of 'improved' stoves and clean fuels in reducing PM and CO: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Environ Int. 2017 Apr;101:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
8
Determinants of Cookstoves and Fuel Choice Among Rural Households in India.
Ecohealth. 2019 Mar;16(1):21-60. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1389-3. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 3;3(12):370-390. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000208. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Transitioning to cleaner solutions and moving away from precautionary energy stacking in Lesotho households.
Discov Energy. 2025;5(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s43937-025-00080-w. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
2
Health Trade-Offs of Boiling Drinking Water with Solid Fuels: A Modeling Study.
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67021. doi: 10.1289/EHP15059. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Impact of the Wood-Burning Cookstove on Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c): A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial in Rural Honduras.
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 May;133(5):57021. doi: 10.1289/EHP15095. Epub 2025 May 27.
7
Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 4;59(4):2006-2017. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c10008. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
8
Acceptability of improved cook stoves-a scoping review of the literature.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):e0004042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004042. eCollection 2025.
9
Estimation of neighborhood scale PM impacts in rural towns in the Purepecha region of Mexico.
Environ Sci Atmos. 2024 Dec 5;5(2):171-180. doi: 10.1039/d4ea00082j. eCollection 2025 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Household Transitions to Clean Energy in a Multi-Provincial Cohort Study in China.
Nat Sustain. 2019 Nov 25;3(1):42-50. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0432-x.
2
Development of Renewable, Densified Biomass for Household Energy in China.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
LPG as a Clean Cooking Fuel: Adoption, Use, and Impact in Rural India.
Energy Policy. 2018 Nov;122:395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Ghana's Rural Liquefied Petroleum Gas Program Scale Up: A case study.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
6
Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 3;3(12):370-390. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000208. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
The Government-led initiative for LPG scale-up in Cameroon: programme development and initial evaluation.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Pellet-Fed Gasifier Stoves Approach Gas-Stove Like Performance during in-Home Use in Rwanda.
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 4;53(11):6570-6579. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00009. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
Assessment of the Cambodian National Biodigester Program.
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验