Suppr超能文献

基于人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量回归(SVR)的模型与传统回归模型在预测喷雾漂移方面的开发及比较分析。

Development and comparative analysis of ANN and SVR-based models with conventional regression models for predicting spray drift.

作者信息

Moges Girma, McDonnell Kevin, Delele Mulugeta Admasu, Ali Addisu Negash, Fanta Solomon Workneh

机构信息

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 436, Nazareth, Ethiopia.

Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, P.O Box 26, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21927-21944. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23571-y. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

Abstract

As monitoring of spray drift during application can be expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive, drift predicting models may provide a practical complement. Several mechanistic models have been developed as drift prediction tool for various types of application equipment. Nevertheless, mechanistic models are quite often intricate and complex with a large number of input parameters required. Quite often, the detailed data needed for such models are not readily available. In this study, two advanced machine learning models (artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR)) were developed for pesticide drift prediction and compared with three conventional regression-based models: multiple linear regression (MLR), generalized linear model (GLM), and generalized nonlinear least squares (GNLS). The models were evaluated in fivefold cross-validation and by external validation using the coefficient of determination (R), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute bias (MAB). From regression-based models, GLM and GNLS models performed very well when evaluated by cross-validation with R = 0.96 and 0.95 and RMSE = 0.70 and 0.82 respectively, while MLR performed less with R of 0.65 and RMSE of 2.25. Simultaneously, ANN and SVR models performed very well with R = 0.98 and 0.97 and RMSE = 0.58 and 0.71 respectively. Overall, ANN model performed best compared to the other four models followed by SVR. A comparison was also made between the high-performing model, ANN, and two previously published empirical models. The ANN model outperformed the two previously published empirical models and can be used to predict pesticide drift. Therefore, the ANN model is a potentially promising new approach for predicting ground drift that merits further study. In conclusion, our work demonstrated that the new approach, ANN and SVR-based models, for pesticide drift modeling has better predictive power than conventional regression models. Their ability to model complex relationships is a clear benefit in pesticide drift modeling where the variability in pesticide drift is often affected by a number of variables and the relationships between drift and predictors are very complicated. We believe such insights will pave better way for the application of machine learning towards spray drift modeling.

摘要

由于在农药施用过程中监测喷雾漂移成本高、耗时且劳动强度大,漂移预测模型可能会提供一种实用的补充方法。已经开发了几种机理模型作为各种类型施用设备的漂移预测工具。然而,机理模型往往错综复杂,需要大量输入参数。通常,此类模型所需的详细数据不易获得。在本研究中,开发了两种先进的机器学习模型(人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量回归(SVR))用于农药漂移预测,并与三种传统的基于回归的模型进行比较:多元线性回归(MLR)、广义线性模型(GLM)和广义非线性最小二乘法(GNLS)。使用决定系数(R)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对偏差(MAB)在五折交叉验证和外部验证中对模型进行评估。在基于回归的模型中,通过交叉验证评估时,GLM和GNLS模型表现非常好,R分别为0.SVR))用于农药漂移预测,并与三种传统的基于回归的模型进行比较:多元线性回归(MLR)、广义线性模型(GLM)和广义非线性最小二乘法(GNLS)。使用决定系数(R)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对偏差(MAB)在五折交叉验证和外部验证中对模型进行评估。在基于回归的模型中,通过交叉验证评估时,GLM和GNLS模型表现非常好,R分别为0.96和0.95,RMSE分别为0.70和0.82,而MLR表现较差,R为0.65,RMSE为2.25。同时,ANN和SVR模型表现非常好,R分别为0.98和0.97,RMSE分别为0.58和0.71。总体而言,与其他四个模型相比,ANN模型表现最佳,其次是SVR。还对高性能模型ANN与两个先前发表的经验模型进行了比较。ANN模型优于两个先前发表的经验模型,可用于预测农药漂移。因此,ANN模型是一种潜在的有前途的预测地面漂移的新方法,值得进一步研究。总之,我们的工作表明,基于ANN和SVR的农药漂移建模新方法比传统回归模型具有更好的预测能力。它们对复杂关系进行建模的能力在农药漂移建模中是一个明显的优势,因为农药漂移的变异性通常受多个变量影响,且漂移与预测因子之间的关系非常复杂。我们相信这些见解将为机器学习在喷雾漂移建模中的应用铺平更好的道路。 96和0.95,RMSE分别为0.70和0.82,而MLR表现较差,R为0.65,RMSE为2.25。同时,ANN和SVR模型表现非常好,R分别为0.98和0.97,RMSE分别为0.58和0.71。总体而言,与其他四个模型相比,ANN模型表现最佳,其次是SVR。还对高性能模型ANN与两个先前发表的经验模型进行了比较。ANN模型优于两个先前发表的经验模型,可用于预测农药漂移。因此,ANN模型是一种潜在的有前途的预测地面漂移的新方法,值得进一步研究。总之,我们的工作表明,基于ANN和SVR的农药漂移建模新方法比传统回归模型具有更好的预测能力。它们对复杂关系进行建模的能力在农药漂移建模中是一个明显的优势,因为农药漂移的变异性通常受多个变量影响,且漂移与预测因子之间的关系非常复杂。我们相信这些见解将为机器学习在喷雾漂移建模中的应用铺平更好的道路。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验