Suppr超能文献

比较糖尿病患者的肥胖人体测量学指标及其与生物电阻抗分析确定的内脏脂肪水平的关系。

Comparison of adiposity anthropometric indices and their associations with visceral fat levels determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis among diabetic patients.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 24;12(1):17824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22848-z.

Abstract

Visceral fat (VF) and its effect on metabolic disorders have been extensively studied; nevertheless, there is a need for a simple and reliable index to equally assess VF in low-resource settings. This multihospital-based study was designed to compare the five adiposity anthropometric indices and their associations with VF levels determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis as the reference standard among diabetic patients. A pretested questionnaire was used to collect anthropometric, biochemical and hemodynamic data from 473 diabetic patients. Regression analysis was performed to determine the associations between the five adiposity anthropometric indices and VF levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to confirm the predictive capacities of the five adiposity anthropometric indices with VF levels. The waist-to-height ratio WHtR showed the greatest ROC value [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.745, p ˂0.001] in identifying diabetic patients with high VF levels compared to body mass index BMI [AUC = 0.584, p = 0.047], waist circumference WC [AUC = 0.723, p ˂0.001], hip circumference HC [AUC = 0.647, p ˂0.001] and waist-to-hip ratio WHR [AUC = 0.711, p ˂0.001]. Likewise, the regression analysis of WHtR and VF levels revealed the strongest association [unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) = 21.49, p < 0.001] compared to BMI [UOR = 6.77, p = 0.008], WC [UOR = 6.37, p < 0.001], HC [UOR = 5.93, p = 0.002] and WHR [UOR = 13.17, p < 0.001]. The optimal cut-off values to identify diabetic patients with high VF levels were > 0.5 for WHtR, > 25.7 kg/m2 for BMI, > 80.5 cm for WC, > 95.5 cm for HC and > 0.82 for WHR. WHtR was shown to have overpowered BMI, HC, WC and WHR in identifying diabetic patients with high VF levels. Therefore, the Ghana Health Service could recommend WHtR as a better diagnostic index for assessing VF levels due to its high predictive capacity.

摘要

内脏脂肪 (VF) 及其对代谢紊乱的影响已得到广泛研究;然而,在资源匮乏的环境中,需要一种简单可靠的指数来同等评估 VF。这项多医院研究旨在比较五种肥胖人体测量指数,并将其与生物电阻抗分析确定的 VF 水平相关联,作为糖尿病患者的参考标准。使用经过预测试的问卷从 473 名糖尿病患者中收集人体测量学、生化和血液动力学数据。进行回归分析以确定这五种肥胖人体测量指数与 VF 水平之间的关联。使用受试者工作特征 (ROC) 曲线来确认这五种肥胖人体测量指数与 VF 水平的预测能力。腰高比 WHtR 在识别患有高 VF 水平的糖尿病患者方面显示出最大的 ROC 值[曲线下面积 (AUC) = 0.745,p ˂0.001],而体重指数 BMI [AUC = 0.584,p = 0.047]、腰围 WC [AUC = 0.723,p ˂0.001]、臀围 HC [AUC = 0.647,p ˂0.001]和腰臀比 WHR [AUC = 0.711,p ˂0.001]。同样,WHtR 与 VF 水平的回归分析显示出最强的关联[未调整的优势比 (UOR) = 21.49,p ˂0.001],而与 BMI [UOR = 6.77,p = 0.008]、WC [UOR = 6.37,p ˂0.001]、HC [UOR = 5.93,p = 0.002]和 WHR [UOR = 13.17,p ˂0.001]相比。识别患有高 VF 水平的糖尿病患者的最佳截断值为 WHtR > 0.5、BMI > 25.7 kg/m2、WC > 80.5 cm、HC > 95.5 cm 和 WHR > 0.82。WHtR 在识别患有高 VF 水平的糖尿病患者方面优于 BMI、HC、WC 和 WHR。因此,加纳卫生局可以推荐 WHtR 作为评估 VF 水平的更好诊断指标,因为它具有较高的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dcc/9592612/a1fe598736f4/41598_2022_22848_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验