• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典青少年物质使用的风险因素:一项跨物质和时间点的研究。

Risk factors for substance use in Swedish adolescents: A study across substances and time points.

作者信息

Dennermalm Nicklas, Karlsson Patrik, Ekendahl Mats

机构信息

Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Oct;39(5):535-552. doi: 10.1177/14550725221108792. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1177/14550725221108792
PMID:36284740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549217/
Abstract

The public health model for prevention of disease and disorder has been influential in informing interventions regarding substance use. While a number of risk factors within this model have been found to predict substance use, few studies have explored the associations across substances, at different time points and in the same individuals. The aim of this study was to test this model across legal and illegal substance use among adolescents, and to identify potential changes in associations over time. Data from two waves of a nationally representative cohort study among Swedish adolescents were used. Baseline data were collected in 2017 (9th grade) with a follow-up in 2019 (11th grade). Using modified Poisson regression analyses, we explored cross-sectional associations between factors from different domains and prevalence of cigarette use, binge-drinking and illegal drug use at both baseline and follow-up. The results in part supported the public health model. Substance use was predicted by factors within the family, school and the individual/peer domain, but several associations were not statistically significant. The only consistent risk factors across substances and time points were lack of parental monitoring, truancy and minor criminal activities. Despite widely different prevalence rates across substances, some risk factors were consistently associated with adolescent substance use. Nonetheless, the findings challenge the assumption that risk factors are stable over adolescence. They suggest a need for flexible prevention interventions spanning across substances and legal boundaries of substances, but also over domains to reflect the heterogenous needs of adolescents.

摘要

疾病和失调预防的公共卫生模式在为物质使用相关干预提供信息方面具有影响力。虽然已发现该模式中的一些风险因素可预测物质使用,但很少有研究探讨不同物质之间、在不同时间点以及在同一人群中的关联。本研究的目的是在青少年合法和非法物质使用方面检验该模式,并确定关联随时间的潜在变化。使用了来自瑞典青少年全国代表性队列研究两波的数据。2017年(九年级)收集基线数据,并于2019年(十一年级)进行随访。通过修正泊松回归分析,我们探讨了不同领域因素与基线和随访时吸烟、暴饮和非法药物使用患病率之间的横断面关联。结果部分支持了公共卫生模式。物质使用可由家庭、学校和个人/同伴领域内的因素预测,但一些关联在统计学上并不显著。跨物质和时间点唯一一致的风险因素是缺乏父母监督、逃学和轻微犯罪活动。尽管不同物质的患病率差异很大,但一些风险因素始终与青少年物质使用相关。尽管如此,研究结果挑战了风险因素在青少年时期稳定不变的假设。它们表明需要灵活的预防干预措施,这些措施不仅要跨越物质以及物质的合法界限,还要跨越不同领域,以反映青少年的多样化需求。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for substance use in Swedish adolescents: A study across substances and time points.瑞典青少年物质使用的风险因素:一项跨物质和时间点的研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Oct;39(5):535-552. doi: 10.1177/14550725221108792. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Stability and Change in Substance Use Among Swedish Adolescents: A Latent Transition Analysis.瑞典青少年物质使用情况的稳定性与变化:潜在转变分析
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(7):947-955. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2198599. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
3
High prevalence of substance use and associated factors among high school adolescents in Woreta Town, Northwest Ethiopia: multi-domain factor analysis.埃塞俄比亚西北部沃雷塔镇高中青少年物质使用的高患病率及相关因素:多领域因素分析
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 20;14:1186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1186.
4
Social Inequality and Substance Use and Problematic Gambling Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Review of Epidemiological Surveys in Germany.社会不平等与青少年和青年的物质使用及问题赌博:德国流行病学调查综述
Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2016;9(1):26-48. doi: 10.2174/1874473709666151209114023.
5
E-cigarette Use, Cigarette Smoking, Dual Use, and Problem Behaviors Among U.S. Adolescents: Results From a National Survey.美国青少年中的电子烟使用、吸烟、双重使用及问题行为:一项全国性调查的结果
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Aug;61(2):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Predictors of binge drinking in adolescents: ultimate and distal factors - a representative study.青少年 binge drinking 的预测因素:终极和远端因素——一项代表性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 2;12:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-263.
7
Further investigation of psychological and environmental correlates of substance use in adolescence in six European countries.对六个欧洲国家青少年物质使用的心理和环境相关因素的进一步调查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May 11;88(2-3):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
8
Use of licit and illicit substances among adolescents in Brazil--a national survey.巴西青少年中合法和非法物质的使用情况——一项全国性调查。
Addict Behav. 2012 Oct;37(10):1171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Individual and school-class correlates of youth cannabis use in Sweden: A multilevel study.瑞典青少年大麻使用的个体及班级相关因素:一项多层次研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018 Apr;35(2):131-146. doi: 10.1177/1455072518763426. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Does parental permissiveness toward cigarette smoking and alcohol use influence illicit drug use among adolescents? A longitudinal study in seven European countries.父母对吸烟和饮酒的放任态度是否会影响青少年的非法药物使用?七个欧洲国家的纵向研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;57(1):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02118-5. Epub 2021 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective associations between adolescent risky substance use and school dropout and the role of externalising and internalising problems.青少年危险物质使用与辍学之间的前瞻性关联以及外化和内化问题的作用。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2024 Feb;41(1):24-38. doi: 10.1177/14550725231188568. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Parenting Practices and Psychosomatic Complaints Among Swedish Adolescents.瑞典青少年的养育实践与身心症状抱怨。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;68:1606580. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606580. eCollection 2023.
3
Digital screens and children.数字屏幕与儿童。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Oct;39(5):469-472. doi: 10.1177/14550725221125586. Epub 2022 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Youth's personal relationships, psychological symptoms, and the use of different substances: A population-based study.青少年的人际关系、心理症状与不同物质的使用:一项基于人群的研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Jun;39(3):322-337. doi: 10.1177/14550725211050768. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Individual and school-class correlates of youth cannabis use in Sweden: A multilevel study.瑞典青少年大麻使用的个体及班级相关因素:一项多层次研究。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018 Apr;35(2):131-146. doi: 10.1177/1455072518763426. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
3
Gender differences among adolescents with substance abuse problems at Maria clinics in Sweden.瑞典玛丽亚诊所存在药物滥用问题的青少年中的性别差异。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018 Feb;35(1):24-38. doi: 10.1177/1455072517751263. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
Less adolescent alcohol and cannabis use: More deviant user groups?青少年饮酒和吸食大麻行为减少:会出现更多越轨用户群体吗?
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Jan;40(1):118-125. doi: 10.1111/dar.13146. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Age-varying associations of parental knowledge and antisocial peer behavior with adolescent substance use.父母知识和反社会同伴行为与青少年物质使用的年龄相关关联。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Feb;56(2):298-311. doi: 10.1037/dev0000866. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Time-varying effects of families and peers on adolescent marijuana use: Person-environment interactions across development.家庭和同伴对青少年大麻使用的时变效应:发展过程中的人-环境交互作用。
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Aug;29(3):887-900. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000559. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Monitoring Matters: Meta-analytic review reveals the reliable linkage of parental monitoring with adolescent marijuana use.监测至关重要:荟萃分析综述揭示了父母监督与青少年大麻使用之间的可靠联系。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;4(6):578-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01166.x.
8
The role of early childhood ADHD and subsequent CD in the initiation and escalation of adolescent cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use.幼儿期注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及随后的品行障碍(CD)在青少年开始吸烟、饮酒和使用大麻及其行为升级过程中的作用。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 May;123(2):362-374. doi: 10.1037/a0036585.
9
Childhood socio-economic status, school failure and drug abuse: a Swedish national cohort study.儿童社会经济地位、学业失败与药物滥用:一项瑞典全国队列研究。
Addiction. 2013 Aug;108(8):1441-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12169. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients.表 2 谬误:呈现和解释混杂因素和修饰因素系数。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb 15;177(4):292-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws412. Epub 2013 Jan 30.