• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择以电子健康记录驱动的招聘策略:基于证据的决策指南。

Selecting EHR-driven recruitment strategies: An evidence-based decision guide.

作者信息

Grout Randall W, Hood Dan, Nelson Sarah J, Harris Paul A, Embí Peter J

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

The Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Aug 8;6(1):e108. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.439. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2022.439
PMID:36285016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549481/
Abstract

Participant recruitment for research is a persistent bottleneck that can be improved by leveraging electronic health records (EHRs). Despite emerging evidence for various EHR-driven approaches, guidance for those attempting to select and use such approaches is limited. The national Recruitment Innovation Center established the EHR Recruitment Consult Resource (ERCR) service line to support multisite studies through implementation of EHR-driven recruitment strategies. As the ERCR, we evolved a guide through 17 consultations over 3 years with multisite studies recruiting in diverse biomedical research domains. We assessed literature and engaged domain experts to identify five key EHR-driven recruitment strategies: direct to patient messages, candidate lists for mailings/calls, direct to research alerts, point of care alerts, and participant registries. Differentiating factors were grouped into factors of study population, study protocol and recruitment workflows, and recruitment site capabilities. The decision matrix indicates acceptable or preferred strategies based on the differentiating factors. Across the ERCR consultations, candidate lists for mailing or calls were most common, participant registries were least frequently recommended, and for some studies no EHR-driven recruitment was recommended. Comparative effectiveness research is needed to refine further evidence for these and potentially new strategies to come.

摘要

研究中的参与者招募一直是个瓶颈,利用电子健康记录(EHR)可以改善这一状况。尽管有越来越多关于各种由电子健康记录驱动的方法的证据,但对于那些试图选择和使用这些方法的人来说,指导却很有限。国家招募创新中心设立了电子健康记录招募咨询资源(ERCR)服务线,通过实施由电子健康记录驱动的招募策略来支持多中心研究。作为ERCR,我们在3年时间里与不同生物医学研究领域进行多中心研究的团队进行了17次咨询,从而制定了一份指南。我们评估了文献并咨询了领域专家,以确定五种由电子健康记录驱动的关键招募策略:直接向患者发送信息、用于邮寄/呼叫的候选名单、直接研究警报、护理点警报和参与者登记册。区分因素分为研究人群、研究方案和招募工作流程以及招募地点能力等因素。决策矩阵根据区分因素表明了可接受或首选的策略。在ERCR的咨询中,用于邮寄或呼叫的候选名单最为常见,参与者登记册的推荐频率最低,对于一些研究,不推荐使用由电子健康记录驱动的招募方式。需要进行比较效果研究,以进一步完善这些策略以及可能出现的新策略的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e72/9549481/422752c33165/S2059866122004393_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e72/9549481/422752c33165/S2059866122004393_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e72/9549481/422752c33165/S2059866122004393_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Selecting EHR-driven recruitment strategies: An evidence-based decision guide.选择以电子健康记录驱动的招聘策略:基于证据的决策指南。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Aug 8;6(1):e108. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.439. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient Recruitment Into a Multicenter Clinical Cohort Linking Electronic Health Records From 5 Health Systems: Cross-sectional Analysis.从 5 个医疗系统的电子健康记录中招募多中心临床队列研究患者:横断面分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 27;23(5):e24003. doi: 10.2196/24003.
3
4
A survey of practices for the use of electronic health records to support research recruitment.一项关于使用电子健康记录支持研究招募的实践调查。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Aug;1(4):246-252. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.301.
5
Perspectives of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women on Participating in Longitudinal Mother-Baby Studies Involving Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.孕妇和哺乳期妇女对参与涉及电子健康记录的母婴纵向研究的看法:定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):e23842. doi: 10.2196/23842.
6
Comparison of electronic health record system functionalities to support the patient recruitment process in clinical trials.支持临床试验患者招募过程的电子健康记录系统功能比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):860-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned.利用电子健康记录和患者门户进行实用临床试验的招募:成功经验和教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jan 1;26(1):44-49. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy138.
8
Research evidence on strategies enabling integration of electronic health records in the health care systems of low- and middle-income countries: A literature review.研究证据表明,在中低收入国家的医疗体系中实现电子健康记录整合的策略:文献综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Apr;34(2):e1016-e1025. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2754. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings.如何在小型门诊环境中成功选择和实施电子健康记录(EHR)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Feb 23;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15.
10
Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.在电子健康记录中实施患者参与工具以加强以患者为中心的沟通:可行性评估方案及初步结果
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30431. doi: 10.2196/30431.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights from the trial innovation network's initial consultation process.试验创新网络初始咨询过程的见解。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun 26;9(1):e149. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10084. eCollection 2025.
2
Human factors and systems simulation methods to optimize peri-operative EHR design and implementation.用于优化围手术期电子健康记录(EHR)设计与实施的人为因素和系统模拟方法。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Apr 23;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00349-z.
3
The trade of illicit cigarettes in Ghana: Insights from a policy synthesis and qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Recruitment Innovation Center: Developing novel, person-centered strategies for clinical trial recruitment and retention.招募创新中心:为临床试验的招募和留住参与者制定新颖的、以患者为中心的策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 19;5(1):e194. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.841. eCollection 2021.
2
EHR-based cohort assessment for multicenter RCTs: a fast and flexible model for identifying potential study sites.基于电子健康记录的多中心随机对照试验队列评估:一种快速灵活的潜在研究地点识别模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):652-659. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab265.
3
A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research.
加纳非法香烟贸易:政策综合与定性研究的见解
Tob Prev Cessat. 2025 Jan 20;11. doi: 10.18332/tpc/195578. eCollection 2025.
4
Considering the interconnected nature of social identities in neuroimaging research.考虑到神经影像学研究中社会身份的相互关联性质。
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Feb;28(2):222-233. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01832-y. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
5
ResearchMatch on FHIR: Development and evaluation of a recruitment registry and electronic health record system interface for volunteer profile completion.基于FHIR的研究匹配:用于完成志愿者资料的招募登记处和电子健康记录系统接口的开发与评估
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 13;7(1):e222. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.654. eCollection 2023.
6
Leveraging the Expertise of the CTSA Program to Increase the Impact and Efficiency of Clinical Trials.利用 CTSA 计划的专业知识提高临床试验的影响力和效率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36470.
7
Use of comprehensive recruitment strategies in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness study (GRADE) multi-center clinical trial.采用综合招聘策略降低糖尿病患者血糖:一项比较有效性研究(GRADE)多中心临床试验。
Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):546-558. doi: 10.1177/17407745231175919. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
自然语言处理系统在临床研究资格筛选中的应用:系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):197-206. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab228.
4
EHR phenotyping for research recruitment: Researcher, IRB, and physician perspectives on approaches to contacting patients.用于研究招募的电子健康记录表型分析:研究人员、机构审查委员会和医生对联系患者方式的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Aug 19;5(1):e32. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.524.
5
CTSA recruitment resources: An inventory of what CTSA hubs are currently offering.临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)招募资源:CTSA中心目前所提供资源的清单。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 May 12;4(6):529-536. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.44.
6
Shared-Task Worklists Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment Workflow in an Academic Emergency Department.共享任务清单改善了学术急诊科临床试验招募工作流程。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):293-300. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727153. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
7
Public attitudes toward an authorization for contact program for clinical research.公众对临床研究联络计划授权的态度。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):354-359. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa214.
8
Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE.可计算表型在全国多中心实用临床试验中的实施:ADAPTABLE 研究的经验教训
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006292. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006292. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Broad-scale informed consent: A survey of the CTSA landscape.广泛知情同意:对临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)领域的一项调查。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 23;3(5):253-260. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.397. eCollection 2019 Oct.
10
Recruitment of trial participants through electronic medical record patient portal messaging: A pilot study.通过电子病历患者门户消息招募试验参与者:一项试点研究。
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):30-38. doi: 10.1177/1740774519873657. Epub 2019 Oct 3.