Armaou Maria, Araviaki Evangelia, Dutta Snigdha, Konstantinidis Stathis, Blake Holly
School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK.
Independent Researcher, London NW1 9AQ, UK.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Oct 3;12(10):1471-1497. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12100102.
Digital psychological interventions can target deficit-oriented and asset-oriented psychological outcomes in the workplace. This review examined: (a) the effectiveness of digital interventions for psychological well-being at work, (b) associations with workplace outcomes, and (c) associations between interventions' effectiveness and their theory-base.
six electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies. The methodological quality of studies that used randomisation was conducted with the "Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias" tool, while the "JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist" was used for non-randomised studies. Studies' theory-base was evaluated using an adaptation of the "theory coding scheme" (TSC). Due to heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed.
51 studies were included in a synthesis describing four clusters of digital interventions: (a) cognitive behavioural therapy, (b) stress-management interventions and workplace well-being promotion, (c) meditation training and mindfulness-based interventions, and (d) self-help interventions. Studies demonstrated a high risk of contamination effects and high attrition bias. Theory-informed interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness. Cognitive behavioural therapy demonstrated the most robust evidence for reducing depression symptoms among healthy employees. With the exception of the Headspace application, there was weak evidence for meditation training apps, while relaxation training was a key component of effective stress-management interventions.
数字心理干预可以针对工作场所中以缺陷为导向和以资产为导向的心理结果。本综述考察了:(a)数字干预对工作中心理健康的有效性,(b)与工作场所结果的关联,以及(c)干预效果与其理论基础之间的关联。
检索了六个电子数据库以查找随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验研究。使用“Cochrane协作网偏倚风险”工具对采用随机化的研究进行方法学质量评估,而“JBI批判性评价清单”用于非随机研究。研究的理论基础使用“理论编码方案”(TSC)的改编版进行评估。由于存在异质性,因此进行了叙述性综合分析。
51项研究被纳入一项综合分析,该分析描述了四类数字干预措施:(a)认知行为疗法,(b)压力管理干预和工作场所幸福感促进,(c)冥想训练和基于正念的干预,以及(d)自助干预。研究表明存在较高的污染效应风险和较高的失访偏倚。基于理论的干预措施显示出更大的有效性。认知行为疗法在减轻健康员工的抑郁症状方面显示出最有力的证据。除Headspace应用程序外,冥想训练应用程序的证据不足,而放松训练是有效的压力管理干预措施的关键组成部分。