Horan Kristin A, Streit Jessica M K, Beltramo Jenna M D, Post Marissa
University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida (Dr Horan, Ms Beltramo, Ms Post); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Streit).
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Mar 1;63(3):e111-e119. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002112.
There is a need to understand how and to what extent theory is used to inform occupational health psychology (OHP) interventions. This study examines the utility of Michie and Prestwich1 theory coding scheme (TCS) to examine the theoretical base of OHP interventions.
We applied the TCS to a systematically derived sample of 27 papers that reported evaluation data for work-related interventions seeking to improve employee sleep quantity or quality.
Results indicated that the original TCS was largely applicable to OHP sleep interventions. After several minor modifications to its evaluative criteria, the TCS successfully accommodates a range of OHP intervention designs.
The revised TCS for OHP interventions allows for a more detailed understanding of the role and use of theory in OHP interventions and may prove to be a valuable tool for OHP researchers and practitioners.
有必要了解理论如何以及在何种程度上被用于为职业健康心理学(OHP)干预提供信息。本研究考察了米基和普雷斯特维奇的理论编码方案(TCS)在检验OHP干预理论基础方面的效用。
我们将TCS应用于从27篇论文中系统抽取的样本,这些论文报告了旨在改善员工睡眠数量或质量的与工作相关干预的评估数据。
结果表明,原始的TCS在很大程度上适用于OHP睡眠干预。对其评估标准进行了一些小的修改后,TCS成功地适应了一系列OHP干预设计。
修订后的OHP干预TCS有助于更详细地理解理论在OHP干预中的作用和应用,可能被证明是OHP研究人员和从业者的一个有价值的工具。