• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支区域起搏联合房室结消融在心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者中的可行性

Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Combined with Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure.

作者信息

Jin Qi-Qi, Zheng Cheng, Wang Yao-Ji, Lin Jia-Xuan, Wu Dao-Zhu, Lin Jia-Feng, Guan Xue-Qiang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 109, Wenzhou 325027, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):338. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100338.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd9100338
PMID:36286290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9604476/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker implantation combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) could be a practical choice for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) has been widely reported.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety and efficacy of LBBaP combined with AVNA in AF patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-six AF patients with HF attempted LBBaP and AVNA from January 2019 to December 2020. Standard LBBaP was achieved in forty-six patients, and another ten received left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). The cardiac function indexes and pacemaker parameters were evaluated at baseline, and we conducted a 1-month and 1-year follow-up.

RESULT

At the time of implantation and 1-month and 1-year follow-up, QRS duration of LVSP group was longer than that of LBBaP group. The pacemaker parameters remained stable in both the LBBaP and LVSP groups. At 1-month and 1-year follow-up after LBBaP and AVNA, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and NYHA classification continued to improve. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS duration change at implantation can predict the magnitude of improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction at 1-year after LBBaP. Baseline right atrial left-right diameter, the degree of tricuspid regurgitation, and interventricular septum thickness may be the factors affecting the success of LBBaP.

CONCLUSION

LBBaP combined with AVNA is safe and effective for patients with AF and HF. Baseline right atrial left-right diameter, the degree of tricuspid regurgitation, and interventricular septum thickness may be the factors affecting the success of LBBaP.

摘要

背景

起搏器植入联合房室结消融(AVNA)可能是心力衰竭(HF)合并心房颤动(AF)患者的一种实用选择。左束支区域起搏(LBBaP)已有广泛报道。

目的

探讨LBBaP联合AVNA治疗HF合并AF患者的安全性和有效性。

方法与结果

2019年1月至2020年12月,56例HF合并AF患者尝试进行LBBaP和AVNA。46例患者成功实现标准LBBaP,另外10例接受左心室间隔起搏(LVSP)。在基线时评估心功能指标和起搏器参数,并进行1个月和1年的随访。

结果

在植入时以及1个月和1年随访时,LVSP组的QRS时限长于LBBaP组。LBBaP组和LVSP组的起搏器参数均保持稳定。LBBaP和AVNA术后1个月和1年随访时,左心室射血分数、左心室舒张末期内径和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级持续改善。植入时的基线左心室射血分数和QRS时限变化可预测LBBaP术后1年左心室射血分数的改善程度。基线右心房左右径、三尖瓣反流程度和室间隔厚度可能是影响LBBaP成功的因素。

结论

LBBaP联合AVNA治疗AF合并HF患者安全有效。基线右心房左右径、三尖瓣反流程度和室间隔厚度可能是影响LBBaP成功的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1681/9604476/df5c284e5180/jcdd-09-00338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1681/9604476/97c95fcd65d2/jcdd-09-00338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1681/9604476/df5c284e5180/jcdd-09-00338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1681/9604476/97c95fcd65d2/jcdd-09-00338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1681/9604476/df5c284e5180/jcdd-09-00338-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Combined with Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure.左束支区域起搏联合房室结消融在心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者中的可行性
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):338. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100338.
2
Single-center experience of efficacy and safety of atrioventricular node ablation after left bundle branch area pacing for the management of atrial fibrillation.左束支区域起搏治疗心房颤动后房室结消融的单中心疗效和安全性经验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;67(8):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01847-2. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
His bundle pacing versus left bundle branch area pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: A prospective and comparative study.希氏束起搏与房室结消融患者左束支区域起搏的前瞻性对比研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Aug-Sep;117(8-9):505-513. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.05.118. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up.希氏束起搏和左束支区域起搏在心房颤动患者中的可行性和安全性:中期随访。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;66(2):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00964-6. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing improves mitral regurgitation and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block.永久性左束支区域起搏改善右束支传导阻滞患者的二尖瓣反流和心功能。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04175-5.
7
Left bundle branch area pacing improving the left atrial outcomes in pace-dependent patients compared with right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing.与右心室流出道间隔部起搏相比,左束支区域起搏可改善依赖起搏的患者的左心房结局。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):e24185. doi: 10.1002/clc.24185. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
8
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group.心力衰竭合并右束支传导阻滞患者的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 14;3(4):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Atrioventricular node ablation and His bundle pacing.房室结消融和希氏束起搏。
Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(suppl_4):iv10-iv16. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux263.
10
[Feasibility and safety of new simplified left bundle branch area pacing via nine-partition method].[通过九分区法进行新型简化左束支区域起搏的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):848-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200520-00414.

引用本文的文献

1
Left bundle branch area pacing prevails over His bundle pacing for heart failure patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation in permanent atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis.在永久性心房颤动中接受房室结消融的心力衰竭患者中,左束支区域起搏优于希氏束起搏:一项网状Meta分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02034-7.
2
Feasibility and Safety Study of Concomitant Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Atrioventricular Node Ablation with Same-Day Hospital Dismissal.同日出院的左束支区域起搏与房室结消融联合应用的可行性和安全性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 9;12(22):7002. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227002.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with conduction system pacing leads: A comparison of His-bundle vs left bundle branch area pacing leads.房室结消融联合心脏传导系统起搏导线:希氏束部位起搏导线与左束支区域起搏导线的比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1116-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.1222. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
2
AV junction ablation and cardiac resynchronization for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS: the APAF-CRT mortality trial.房室结消融联合心脏再同步治疗永久性心房颤动伴窄 QRS 波患者:APAF-CRT 死亡率试验。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 7;42(46):4731-4739. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab569.
3
Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead?
心脏起搏的范式转变:我们何去何从,未来又将如何?
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2938. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082938.
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.
大型单中心研究中的左束支起搏的长期安全性和可行性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing.左束支区域起搏治疗非缺血性心肌病患者的心脏再同步治疗。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;6(7):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.011.
5
The efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: A matched case-control study.左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏治疗心力衰竭患者的疗效比较:一项匹配病例对照研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):2068-2077. doi: 10.1111/jce.14628. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum.经室间隔行永久性左束支起搏的可行性和心脏同步性。
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1694-1702. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz188.
7
A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing.永久性左束支起搏初学者指南。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1791-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
8
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect.永久性左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导阻滞:可行性、安全性和急性效应。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Atrioventricular node ablation and His bundle pacing.房室结消融和希氏束起搏。
Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(suppl_4):iv10-iv16. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux263.
10
A Novel Pacing Strategy With Low and Stable Output: Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Immediately Beyond the Conduction Block.一种具有低且稳定输出的新型起搏策略:在传导阻滞远端立即起搏左束支。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Dec;33(12):1736.e1-1736.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 22.