Suppr超能文献

不同类聚性眼动亚型的功能磁共振成像激活。

Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation for different vergence eye movement subtypes.

机构信息

The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jan;43(1):93-104. doi: 10.1111/opo.13063. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maddox suggested that there were four convergence subtypes, each driven by a different stimulus. The purpose of this study was to assess the neural correlates for accommodative convergence, proximal convergence (convergence stimulus provided), disparity convergence and voluntary convergence (no specific convergence stimulus provided) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

METHODS

Ten subjects (mean age = 24.4 years) with normal binocular vision participated. The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals of the brain from fMRI scans were measured when subjects made vergence eye movements while: (1) alternately viewing letters monocularly where one eye viewed through a -2.00 D lens, (2) alternately viewing Difference of Gaussian targets monocularly at distance and near, (3) viewing random dot stereograms with increasing disparity and (4) voluntarily converging the eyes with binocular viewing.

RESULTS

The accommodative convergence paradigm resulted in activation on the right side in the right fusiform cortex and the right middle occipital cortex. The proximal convergence stimulus mainly activated areas in the right occipital lobe. The disparity stimulus activated areas in the left occipital cortex and the left frontal cortex. Finally, the voluntary convergence paradigm resulted in activation primarily in the occipital lobe and mostly bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

The accommodative, proximal, disparity and voluntary convergence paradigms resulted in activation in unique areas in the brain with functional MRI. Activation was found in more areas in the proximal and voluntary conditions compared with the accommodative and disparity conditions.

摘要

简介

Maddox 提出有四种聚散亚型,每种亚型都由不同的刺激驱动。本研究旨在使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估调节性集合、近感性集合(提供集合刺激)、视差集合和自主性集合(未提供特定集合刺激)的神经相关性。

方法

10 名具有正常双眼视觉的受试者(平均年龄 24.4 岁)参与了此项研究。当受试者在进行会聚性眼动时,从 fMRI 扫描中测量大脑的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号:(1)交替地单眼观看带有-2.00D 透镜的字母,(2)交替地在远距离和近距离观看高斯差分目标,(3)观看具有递增视差的随机点立体图,(4)在双眼观看时自主会聚眼睛。

结果

调节性集合范式导致右侧梭状回和右侧中枕叶的右侧激活。近感性集合刺激主要激活右侧枕叶区域。视差刺激激活了左侧枕叶和左侧额叶的区域。最后,自主性集合范式主要导致枕叶区域激活,且大多为双侧激活。

结论

功能性磁共振成像显示,调节性、近感性、视差和自主性集合范式在大脑的独特区域引起了激活。与调节性和视差条件相比,在近感性和自主性条件下发现了更多的激活区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0bc/10092606/a9f66a5b02d2/OPO-43-93-g005.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验