Millward Jordin, McKay Kasidy, Holmes John T, Owens Christopher T
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kasiska Division of Health Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Oct 9;10(5):130. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050130.
Homeopathic products are available over the counter in many pharmacies in the United States and are popular among consumers, although there is no conclusive evidence of their therapeutic effects. Pharmacists are obligated to provide well-informed, evidence-based information on these products, but many graduates may not be receiving adequate training in this area. This report outlines the results of a survey assessing whether taking a focused elective course in complementary and integrative health (CIH) affects knowledge and perceptions regarding homeopathy. A 22-question survey was developed and distributed to graduates of Idaho State University College of Pharmacy. Responses on survey items were compared between those who had reported taking the CIH elective course and those who had not. Of the 475 pharmacists, 89 completed the survey (response rate of 18.7%). Pharmacists who had taken the CIH elective course reported being more comfortable answering patient questions (82% vs. 44%, p < 0.001), felt more able to make recommendations (75% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), and felt they could explain the proposed mechanism of action of homeopathic remedies to their patients (87% vs. 61%, p = 0.002). Those who took the elective course were also more likely to say that any benefits of homeopathy were due to the placebo effect (82% vs. 64%, p = 0.007). A significantly higher portion of respondents who had not taken the elective course indicated that they could benefit from further training on CIH topics when compared with those who had taken the elective course (85% vs. 51%, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to their use of reliable resources (e.g., PubMed and Natural Medicines) vs. unreliable sources (other internet searches or personal anecdotes) when addressing CIH-related questions. These findings indicate that pharmacists with more focused training in CIH are more comfortable, confident, and knowledgeable when discussing homeopathy. Such education should be provided more broadly to students in colleges of pharmacy.
顺势疗法产品在美国的许多药店都可以非处方购买到,并且在消费者中很受欢迎,尽管没有确凿证据证明其治疗效果。药剂师有义务提供关于这些产品的见多识广、基于证据的信息,但许多毕业生可能在这方面没有接受过充分的培训。本报告概述了一项调查的结果,该调查评估了参加一门关于补充与整合健康(CIH)的重点选修课程是否会影响对顺势疗法的知识和认知。一份包含22个问题的调查问卷被编制出来,并分发给爱达荷州立大学药学院的毕业生。对调查问卷项目的回答在报告参加过CIH选修课程的人和未参加过的人之间进行了比较。在475名药剂师中,有89人完成了调查(回复率为18.7%)。参加过CIH选修课程的药剂师表示,他们在回答患者问题时更自在(82%对44%,p<0.001),觉得更有能力给出建议(75%对36%,p<0.001),并且觉得他们能够向患者解释顺势疗法药物的拟议作用机制(87%对61%,p = 0.002)。参加选修课程的人也更有可能说顺势疗法的任何益处都归因于安慰剂效应(82%对64%,p = 0.007)。与参加过选修课程的人相比,未参加选修课程的受访者中,有更高比例的人表示他们可以从关于CIH主题的进一步培训中受益(85%对51%,p = 0.02)。在处理与CIH相关的问题时,两组在使用可靠资源(如PubMed和天然药物)与不可靠资源(其他互联网搜索或个人轶事)方面没有显著差异。这些发现表明,在CIH方面接受过更有针对性培训的药剂师在讨论顺势疗法时更自在、更自信且知识更丰富。这种教育应该更广泛地提供给药学院的学生。