• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高再入院风险患者的多模式过渡性护理干预效果:TARGET-READ 随机临床试验。

Effects of a Multimodal Transitional Care Intervention in Patients at High Risk of Readmission: The TARGET-READ Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Neuchâtel Hospital Network, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Division of Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;183(7):658-668. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0791.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0791
PMID:37126338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10152373/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hospital readmissions are frequent, costly, and sometimes preventable. Although these issues have been well publicized and incentives to reduce them introduced, the best interventions for reducing readmissions remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of a multimodal transitional care intervention targeting patients at high risk of hospital readmission on the composite outcome of 30-day unplanned readmission or death.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-blinded, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2018 to January 2020, with a 30-day follow-up in 4 medium-to-large-sized teaching hospitals in Switzerland. Participants were consecutive patients discharged from general internal medicine wards and at higher risk of unplanned readmission based on their simplified HOSPITAL score (≥4 points). Data were analyzed between April and September 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention group underwent systematic medication reconciliation, a 15-minute patient education session with teach-back, a planned first follow-up visit with their primary care physician, and postdischarge follow-up telephone calls from the study team at 3 and 14 days. The control group received usual care from their hospitalist, plus a 1-page standard study information sheet.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thirty-day postdischarge unplanned readmission or death.

RESULTS

A total of 1386 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 72 (14) years; 712 (51%) were male. The composite outcome of 30-day unplanned readmission or death was 21% (95% CI, 18% to 24%) in the intervention group and 19% (95% CI, 17% to 22%) in the control group. The intention-to-treat analysis risk difference was 1.7% (95% CI, -2.5% to 5.9%; P = .44). There was no evidence of any intervention effects on time to unplanned readmission or death, postdischarge health care use, patient satisfaction with the quality of their care transition, or readmission costs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, use of a standardized multimodal care transition intervention targeting higher-risk patients did not significantly decrease the risks of 30-day postdischarge unplanned readmission or death; it demonstrated the difficulties in preventing hospital readmissions, even when multimodal interventions specifically target higher-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03496896.

摘要

重要性

医院再入院频繁且费用高昂,有时甚至可以预防。尽管这些问题已经得到广泛宣传,并引入了减少再入院的激励措施,但降低再入院率的最佳干预措施仍不清楚。

目的

评估针对高风险再入院患者的多模式过渡护理干预对 30 天内非计划性再入院或死亡的复合结局的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项单盲、多中心随机临床试验,于 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 1 月进行,在瑞士 4 家中等至大型教学医院进行了 30 天的随访。参与者为根据简化 HOSPITAL 评分(≥4 分)确定的有较高非计划性再入院风险的普通内科病房出院患者。数据于 2022 年 4 月至 9 月进行分析。

干预措施

干预组接受系统的药物重整、15 分钟的带教回授患者教育、与初级保健医生进行计划的首次随访以及出院后研究团队在第 3 天和第 14 天进行的电话随访。对照组接受其主治医生的常规治疗,外加 1 页标准研究信息表。

主要结局和测量指标

30 天内非计划性再入院或死亡。

结果

共纳入 1386 例患者,平均(SD)年龄为 72(14)岁,712 例(51%)为男性。干预组 30 天内非计划性再入院或死亡的复合结局发生率为 21%(95%CI,18%24%),对照组为 19%(95%CI,17%22%)。意向治疗分析的风险差异为 1.7%(95%CI,-2.5%~5.9%;P=0.44)。没有证据表明干预对非计划性再入院或死亡时间、出院后医疗保健使用、患者对护理过渡质量的满意度或再入院费用有任何影响。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,使用针对高风险患者的标准化多模式护理过渡干预并没有显著降低 30 天内出院后非计划性再入院或死亡的风险;这表明,即使多模式干预专门针对高风险患者,预防医院再入院仍具有挑战性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03496896。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/3ffffef16007/jamainternmed-e230791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/5a5c9b77b03e/jamainternmed-e230791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/5f3c5e668f8d/jamainternmed-e230791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/3ffffef16007/jamainternmed-e230791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/5a5c9b77b03e/jamainternmed-e230791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/5f3c5e668f8d/jamainternmed-e230791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5387/10152373/3ffffef16007/jamainternmed-e230791-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of a Multimodal Transitional Care Intervention in Patients at High Risk of Readmission: The TARGET-READ Randomized Clinical Trial.高再入院风险患者的多模式过渡性护理干预效果:TARGET-READ 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;183(7):658-668. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0791.
2
Effects of Hospital-Based Comprehensive Medication Reviews Including Postdischarge Follow-up on Older Patients' Use of Health Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于医院的综合药物评估(包括出院后随访)对老年患者医疗保健利用的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216303. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6303.
3
Effect of Medication Reconciliation at Hospital Admission on 30-Day Returns to Hospital: A Randomized Clinical Trial.入院时药物重整对 30 天内返院的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24672.
4
Effect of Community Health Workers on 30-Day Hospital Readmissions in an Accountable Care Organization Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者对问责制医疗组织人群中 30 天内再入院的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110936. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10936.
5
Transitional care interventions reduce unplanned hospital readmissions in high-risk older adults.过渡性护理干预可减少高危老年人的非计划住院再入院情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3771-9.
6
Effect of a postdischarge virtual ward on readmission or death for high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial.高危患者出院后虚拟病房对再入院或死亡的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1305-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11492.
7
Applying the Integrated Practice Unit Concept to a Modified Virtual Ward Model of Care for Patients at Highest Risk of Readmission: A Randomized Controlled Trial.将综合实践单元概念应用于针对再入院风险最高患者的改良虚拟病房护理模式:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168757. eCollection 2017.
8
Home Telemonitoring to Reduce Readmission of High-Risk Patients: a Modified Intention-to-Treat Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭远程监护降低高危患者再入院率:一项修改意向治疗的随机临床试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3395-3401. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06589-1. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
The effects of a transitional care program on discharge readiness, transitional care quality, health services utilization and satisfaction among Chinese kidney transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial.过渡护理方案对中国肾移植受者出院准备度、过渡护理质量、卫生服务利用和满意度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103700. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103700. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Effect of an In-Hospital Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Risk of Readmission: A Randomized Clinical Trial.医院多方面临床药师干预对再入院风险的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):375-382. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8274.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a healthcare utilisation index to compare patients worldwide: a cross-sectional study.开发一种医疗保健利用指数以比较全球患者:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13029-5.
2
Rurality and patients' hospital experience: A multisite analysis from a US healthcare system.乡村地区与患者的住院体验:来自美国医疗系统的多地点分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308564. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of digital tools to promote hospital quality and safety on adverse events after discharge.
数字工具对促进医院质量和安全的影响与出院后不良事件的关系。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2304-2314. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae176.
4
Patient medication management, understanding and adherence during the transition from hospital to outpatient care - a qualitative longitudinal study in polymorbid patients with type 2 diabetes.患者的药物管理、从住院过渡到门诊护理期间的理解和依从性 - 2 型糖尿病合并多种疾病患者的定性纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 13;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10784-9.
5
Coordination of oral anticoagulant care at hospital discharge (COACHeD): pilot randomised controlled trial.出院时口服抗凝药物管理的协调(COACHeD):试点随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e079353. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079353.
6
Navigating outpatient care of patients with type 2 diabetes after hospital discharge - a qualitative longitudinal study.出院后 2 型糖尿病患者门诊医疗护理的探索 - 一项定性纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10959-4.
7
Rehospitalization After PCI vs CABG for Left Main Disease: Refocusing Our Lens.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗左主干病变后的再住院情况:重新审视我们的视角。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Mar 19;83(11):1082-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.028.