• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥恰帕斯州农村地区一家分娩中心和社区医院的设施分娩趋势及护理障碍:一项混合方法研究。

Trends in facility-based childbirth and barriers to care at a birth center and community hospital in rural Chiapas, Mexico: A mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Truong Samantha, Montaño Mariana, Sullivan Margaret M, Macias Valeria, Flores Hugo, Mata Hellen, Molina Rose L

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Compañeros En Salud (Partners In Health-Mexico), Calle Primera Poniente Sur #25, Ángel Albino Corzo, Chiapas, Mexico, 30370.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2023 Jan;116:103507. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103507. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103507
PMID:36288677
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends in childbirth at a hospital-birth center among women living in Compañeros En Salud (CES)-affiliated communities in Chiapas, Mexico and explore barriers to childbirth care. Our hypothesis was that despite interventions to support and incentivize childbirth at the hospital-birth center, the proportion of births at the hospital-birth center among women from Compañeros En Salud-affiliated communities has not significantly changed after two years. We suspected that this may be due to structural factors impacting access to care and/or perceptions of care impacting desire to deliver at the birth center.

DESIGN

This explanatory mixed-methods study included a retrospective Compañeros En Salud maternal health census review followed by quantitative surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Participants were women living in municipalities in the mountainous Sierra Madre region of Chiapas, Mexico who received prenatal care in one of 10 community clinics served by Compañeros En Salud. Participants were recruited if they gave birth anywhere other than the primary-level rural hospital and adjacent birth center supported by Compañeros En Salud, either at home or at other facilities.

MEASUREMENTS

We compared rates of birth at the hospital-birth center, other health facilities, and at home from 2017-2018. We conducted surveys and interviews with women who gave birth between January 2017-July 2018 at home or at facilities other than the hospital-birth center to understand perceptions of care and decision-making surrounding childbirth location.

FINDINGS

We found no significant difference in rates of overall number of women birthing at the hospital-birth center from Compañeros En Salud-affiliated communities between 2017 and 2018 (p=0.36). Analysis of 158 surveys revealed distance (30.4%), time (27.8%), and costs (25.9%) as reasons for not birthing at the hospital-birth center. From 27 interviews, negative perceptions and experiences of the hospital included low-quality and disrespectful care, low threshold for medical interventions, and harm and suffering. Partners or family members influenced most decisions about childbirth location.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to minimize logistical barriers may not be sufficient to overcome distance and perceptions of low-quality, disrespectful care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Better understanding of complex decision-making around childbirth will guide Compañeros En Salud in developing interventions to further meet the needs and preferences of birthing women in rural Chiapas.

摘要

目的

评估墨西哥恰帕斯州与健康伙伴组织(CES)相关社区的妇女在医院分娩中心的分娩趋势,并探讨分娩护理的障碍。我们的假设是,尽管采取了干预措施来支持和激励在医院分娩中心分娩,但两年后,来自与健康伙伴组织相关社区的妇女在医院分娩中心的分娩比例并未显著变化。我们怀疑这可能是由于影响获得护理的结构因素和/或影响在分娩中心分娩意愿的护理观念所致。

设计

这项解释性混合方法研究包括对健康伙伴组织孕产妇健康普查进行回顾性分析,随后进行定量调查和半结构化定性访谈。

参与者和地点

参与者是居住在墨西哥恰帕斯州马德雷山脉地区各市的妇女,她们在由健康伙伴组织服务的10家社区诊所之一接受了产前护理。如果她们在由健康伙伴组织支持的基层农村医院和相邻分娩中心以外的任何地方分娩,无论是在家中还是在其他机构,均被纳入研究。

测量

我们比较了2017 - 2018年在医院分娩中心、其他医疗机构和家中的分娩率。我们对2017年1月至2018年7月在家中或在医院分娩中心以外的机构分娩的妇女进行了调查和访谈,以了解她们对护理的看法以及围绕分娩地点的决策情况。

结果

我们发现,2017年至2018年期间,来自与健康伙伴组织相关社区的妇女在医院分娩中心的总分娩率没有显著差异(p = 0.36)。对158份调查问卷的分析显示,距离(30.4%)、时间(27.8%)和费用(25.9%)是不在医院分娩中心分娩的原因。从27次访谈中得知,对医院的负面看法和经历包括护理质量低、不尊重患者、医疗干预门槛低以及伤害和痛苦。伴侣或家庭成员对大多数分娩地点的决策有影响。

主要结论

尽量减少后勤障碍的干预措施可能不足以克服距离以及对低质量、不尊重护理的看法。

对实践的启示

更好地理解围绕分娩的复杂决策将指导健康伙伴组织制定干预措施,以进一步满足恰帕斯州农村地区分娩妇女的需求和偏好。

相似文献

1
Trends in facility-based childbirth and barriers to care at a birth center and community hospital in rural Chiapas, Mexico: A mixed-methods study.墨西哥恰帕斯州农村地区一家分娩中心和社区医院的设施分娩趋势及护理障碍:一项混合方法研究。
Midwifery. 2023 Jan;116:103507. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103507. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Exploring how non-clinical factors in childbirth care shape users' experiences in public health facilities in rural Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study using the WHO health systems responsiveness framework.探讨墨西哥恰帕斯农村地区公共卫生设施中分娩护理的非临床因素如何影响用户体验:使用世界卫生组织卫生系统反应性框架的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06357-7.
3
"Morir En Camino": Community Narratives about Childbirth Care in Rural Chiapas.《途中死亡》:恰帕斯农村地区关于分娩护理的社区叙事。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Mar;14(3):396-406. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1512143. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
4
Designing a Midwife-Led Birth Center Program Based on the MAP-IT Model: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study.基于 MAP-IT 模型设计助产士主导的生育中心项目:一项序列解释性混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 4;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01824-y.
5
Is it home delivery or health facility? Community perceptions on place of childbirth in rural Northwest Tanzania using a qualitative approach.是家庭分娩还是医疗机构?坦桑尼亚西北部农村地区以定性方法评估对分娩地点的社区认知。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02967-z.
6
When, where and who? Accessing health facility delivery care from the perspective of women and men in Tanzania: a qualitative study.何时、何地以及何人?从坦桑尼亚男性和女性的角度看获得医疗机构分娩护理的情况:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3357-6.
7
Traditions and trust: a qualitative study of barriers to facility-based obstetric and immediate neonatal care in Chiapas, Mexico.传统与信任:墨西哥恰帕斯州以医疗机构为基础的产科和新生儿即时护理障碍的定性研究。
Women Health. 2022 Jul;62(6):522-531. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2089442. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
Exploring women's perspectives of access to care during pregnancy and childbirth: a qualitative study from rural Papua New Guinea.探索巴布亚新几内亚农村地区妇女在孕期和分娩期间获得医疗服务的观点:一项定性研究
Midwifery. 2013 Oct;29(10):1222-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Perceptions of isolation during facility births in Haiti - a qualitative study.海地医疗机构分娩期间的孤独感认知 - 一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 27;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0843-1.
10
Barriers and facilitators influencing facility-based childbirth in rural Haiti: a mixed method study with a convergent design.影响海地农村医疗机构分娩的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究,采用收敛设计。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002526.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring how non-clinical factors in childbirth care shape users' experiences in public health facilities in rural Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study using the WHO health systems responsiveness framework.探讨墨西哥恰帕斯农村地区公共卫生设施中分娩护理的非临床因素如何影响用户体验:使用世界卫生组织卫生系统反应性框架的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06357-7.