Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1964. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1.
Knowing what facilitates and hinders physical activity behaviour across domains (leisure, travel, work or education, and household) is central for the development of actions for more active lifestyles. Thus, the aim of this systematic review of reviews was to summarize the evidence on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity.
We included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that investigated the association between modifiable barriers and facilitators and levels of domain-specific physical activity. Reviews published until September 2020 were retrieved from PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Regional Library of Medicine (BIREME), and PsycNET, and from the reference list of selected articles. Each review was screened by two independent reviewers for eligibility. Data extracted from selected papers included methodological aspects (number of primary studies, study designs, and age groups); physical activity domains and barriers and facilitators investigated; and direction of association. For each pair of barrier/facilitator and domain-specific physical activity, we recorded the number of positive, negative, and null associations reported across reviews. Quality assessment of each systematic review was performed using the AMSTAR-2 tool.
Forty-four systematic reviews were selected. The evidence base was largest for leisure-time followed by travel-related physical activity. A very small number of reviews included physical activity in work, educational and domestic settings. Across all physical activity domains, factors related to the built environment were more abundant in the reviews than intra and interpersonal factors. Very consistent positive associations were observed between a range of intrapersonal factors and leisure-time physical activity, as well as moderately consistent evidence of positive association for general social support and support from family members. Evidence of moderate consistency was found for the positive association between transport-related physical activity and positive beliefs about consequences, walkability, and existence of facilities that support active travel. Evidence on barriers and facilitators for physical activity at work, educational, and domestic settings was limited in volume and consistency.
Efforts and resources are required to diversify and strength the evidence base on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity, as it is still limited and biased towards the leisure domain and built environment factors.
PROSPERO CRD42020209710.
了解促进和阻碍各领域(休闲、旅行、工作或教育以及家庭)身体活动的因素对于制定更积极的生活方式行动至关重要。因此,本系统综述的目的是总结关于特定领域身体活动的障碍和促进因素的证据。
我们纳入了有或没有荟萃分析的系统综述,这些综述调查了可改变的障碍和促进因素与特定领域身体活动水平之间的关联。从 PubMed、ISI Web of Science、Scopus、区域医学图书馆(BIREME)和 PsycNET 以及选定文章的参考文献中检索了截至 2020 年 9 月发表的系统综述。每篇综述都由两名独立的评审员进行筛选,以确定其是否符合条件。从选定论文中提取的数据包括方法学方面(初级研究数量、研究设计和年龄组);调查的特定领域身体活动和障碍以及促进因素;以及关联的方向。对于每一对障碍/促进因素和特定领域的身体活动,我们记录了综述中报告的阳性、阴性和中性关联的数量。使用 AMSTAR-2 工具对每个系统综述进行质量评估。
共选择了 44 篇系统综述。休闲时间相关的身体活动的证据基础最大,其次是与旅行相关的身体活动。只有少数综述包括工作、教育和家庭环境中的身体活动。在所有身体活动领域中,与建筑环境相关的因素比内部和人际因素在综述中更为丰富。一系列内在因素与休闲时间身体活动之间存在非常一致的积极关联,以及普遍的社会支持和家庭成员支持之间存在适度一致的积极关联的证据。证据表明,与交通相关的身体活动与对后果的积极信念、可步行性以及支持积极出行的设施的存在之间存在适度一致的积极关联。关于工作、教育和家庭环境中身体活动的障碍和促进因素的证据在数量和一致性方面都很有限。
需要努力和资源来丰富和加强特定领域身体活动的障碍和促进因素的证据基础,因为该证据仍然有限且偏向于休闲领域和建筑环境因素。
PROSPERO CRD42020209710。