PIRE Programs NF, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 2030 Addiston St., Suite 410, 94704, Berkeley, CA, United States.
PIRE Programs NF, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 101 Conner Drive, Suite 200, 27514, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14358-4.
This study examined the prevalence of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk in samples of adult drinkers in three middle-income countries (Brazil, China, South Africa), and the extent to which meeting criteria for AUD risk was associated with SBI.
Cross-sectional survey data were collected from adult samples in two cities in each country in 2018. Survey measures included past-year alcohol use, the CAGE assessment for AUD risk, talking to a health care professional in the past year, alcohol use screening by a health care professional, receiving advice about drinking from a health care professional, and sociodemographic characteristics. The prevalence of SBI was determined for past-year drinkers in each country and for drinkers who had talked to a health care professional. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine whether meeting criteria for AUD risk was associated with SBI when adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.
Among drinkers at risk for AUD, alcohol use screening rates ranged from 6.7% in South Africa to 14.3% in Brazil, and brief intervention rates ranged from 4.6% in South Africa to 8.2% in China. SBI rates were higher among drinkers who talked to a health care professional in the past year. In regression analyses, AUD risk was positively associated with SBI in China and South Africa, and with brief intervention in Brazil.
Although the prevalence of SBI among drinkers at risk for AUD in Brazil, China, and South Africa appears to be low, it is encouraging that these drinkers were more likely to receive SBI.
本研究调查了在三个中等收入国家(巴西、中国、南非)的成年饮酒者样本中,酒精使用障碍(AUD)风险的筛查和简短干预(SBI)的流行情况,以及符合 AUD 风险标准与 SBI 的相关性。
2018 年在每个国家的两个城市从成年样本中收集了横断面调查数据。调查措施包括过去一年的饮酒量、AUD 风险的 CAGE 评估、过去一年与医疗保健专业人员交谈、过去一年医疗保健专业人员进行的酒精使用筛查、从医疗保健专业人员处获得有关饮酒的建议以及社会人口统计学特征。确定了每个国家过去一年饮酒者和与医疗保健专业人员交谈过的饮酒者的 SBI 患病率。进行逻辑回归分析,以检查在调整社会人口统计学特征后,符合 AUD 风险标准是否与 SBI 相关。
在 AUD 风险饮酒者中,酒精使用筛查率从南非的 6.7%到巴西的 14.3%不等,简短干预率从南非的 4.6%到中国的 8.2%不等。在过去一年中与医疗保健专业人员交谈过的饮酒者中,SBI 率更高。在回归分析中,AUD 风险与中国和南非的 SBI 以及巴西的简短干预呈正相关。
尽管巴西、中国和南非 AUD 风险饮酒者中 SBI 的流行率似乎较低,但令人鼓舞的是,这些饮酒者更有可能接受 SBI。