Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Jun 29;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00250-w.
There is no longer support for the idea that brief intervention programmes alone can contribute meaningfully to the improvement of population health relating to alcohol. As a result, calls for major innovations and paradigm shifts grow, notably among research leaders. This paper briefly examines the history of the development of the evidence-base from the landmark World Health Organisation projects on Screening and Brief Intervention (SBI) in the 1980s onwards. Particular attention is given to weaknesses in the theorisation of social influence and interventions design, and declining effect sizes over time. Although the old SBI paradigm may be exhausted where it has been applied, it has not been replaced by a new paradigm. Alcohol marketing encourages heavy drinking and today may have more powerful effects on thinking about alcohol, and about alcohol problems, than previously. The nature of the societal challenge being faced in an alcogenic environment in which alcohol is widely promoted and weakly regulated underpins consideration of the possibilities for contemporary evidence-informed public health responses. Evidence-informed perspectives in discourses on alcohol problems need to be strengthened in redeveloping rationales for brief interventions. This process needs to move away from sole reliance on a model based on a two-person discussion of alcohol, which is divorced from wider concerns the person may have. Reimagining the nature of brief interventions involves incorporating digital content, emphasising meso-level social processes based on material that people want to share, and seeking synergies with macro-level population and media issues, including alcohol policy measures.
Current versions of brief interventions may be simply too weak to contend with the pressures of an alcogenic environment. A new generation of brief interventions could have a key role to play in developing multi-level responses to the problems caused by alcohol.
不再有人支持这样的观点,即简短干预方案本身可以对改善与酒精相关的人口健康产生有意义的影响。因此,越来越多的人呼吁进行重大创新和范式转变,尤其是在研究领导者中。本文简要回顾了自 20 世纪 80 年代世界卫生组织(WHO)开展的关于筛查和简短干预(SBI)的标志性项目以来,循证基础发展的历史。特别关注社会影响理论化和干预设计的弱点,以及随着时间的推移效果大小的下降。尽管旧的 SBI 范式在其应用范围内可能已经耗尽,但它并没有被新的范式所取代。酒精营销鼓励豪饮,如今可能对人们对酒精的思考方式以及对酒精问题的看法产生比以前更强大的影响。在广泛推广和监管不力的酒精环境中,社会面临的挑战性质支撑了对当代循证公共卫生应对措施可能性的考虑。在重新制定简短干预措施的理由时,需要加强循证观点在酒精问题论述中的地位。这一过程需要摆脱仅仅依赖基于两人讨论酒精的模式,这种模式脱离了人们可能关心的更广泛的问题。重新构想简短干预的性质涉及纳入数字内容,强调基于人们想要分享的材料的中观层面社会过程,并寻求与宏观层面的人口和媒体问题,包括酒精政策措施的协同作用。
目前的简短干预措施版本可能过于薄弱,无法应对酒精环境的压力。新一代简短干预措施可以在制定针对酒精引起的问题的多层次应对措施方面发挥关键作用。