H & TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal.
Public Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1099-085 Lisbon, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;19(20):13488. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013488.
Respiratory abnormalities among workers at coffee roasting and packaging facilities have already been reported; however, little is known about microbiological contamination inside coffee production facilities. This study intends to assess the microbial contamination (fungi and bacteria) in two coffee industries from Brazil with a multi-approach protocol for sampling and for subsequent analyses using four main sources of samples: filtering respiratory protection devices (FRPD) used by workers, settled dust, electrostatic dust cloths (EDC) and coffee beans. The fungal contamination in the assessed industries was also characterized through the molecular detection of toxigenic species and antifungal resistance. Total bacteria contamination presented the highest values in FRPD collected from both industries (7.45 × 104 CFU·m; 1.09 × 104 CFU·m). genera was widespread in all the environmental samples collected and sections with clinical relevance () and with toxigenic potential ( and ) were recovered from FRPD. section was observed in 4 mg/mL itraconazole. Sections (EDC, coffee beans and settled dust) and (EDC, coffee beans and FRPD) were detected by qPCR. Some of the targeted sections that have been identified microscopically were not detected by qPCR and vice-versa. Overall, this study revealed that microbial contamination is a potential occupational risk in the milling stage and should be tackled when assessing exposure and performing risk assessment. In addition, a multi-sampling campaign should be the approach to follow when assessing microbial contamination and FRPD should be included in this campaign. Occupational exposure to mycotoxins should be considered due to high fungal diversity and contamination. A One Health approach should address these issues in order to prevent consumption of coffee crops and beans infected by fungi and, more specifically, to avoid widespread azole resistance.
已有研究报道了咖啡烘焙和包装设施中工人的呼吸异常;然而,人们对咖啡生产设施内的微生物污染知之甚少。本研究旨在评估巴西两家咖啡企业的微生物污染(真菌和细菌),采用多方法采样方案,并对使用四个主要样本来源的后续分析:工人使用的呼吸防护设备(FRPD)、沉降灰尘、静电除尘布(EDC)和咖啡豆。评估的行业中真菌污染也通过分子检测产毒物种和抗真菌药物耐药性进行了特征描述。总细菌污染在两个行业收集的 FRPD 中最高(7.45×104 CFU·m;1.09×104 CFU·m)。在所有收集的环境样本中, 属广泛存在,从 FRPD 中回收了具有临床相关性()和产毒潜力(和)的部分。在 4 mg/mL 伊曲康唑中观察到 节。qPCR 检测到 EDC(EDC、咖啡豆和沉降灰尘)和 (EDC、咖啡豆和 FRPD)部分。通过显微镜观察到一些目标 部分,但 qPCR 未检测到,反之亦然。总的来说,本研究表明,微生物污染是研磨阶段潜在的职业风险,在评估暴露和进行风险评估时应予以解决。此外,当评估微生物污染时,应采用多采样方法,FRPD 应包含在该方法中。由于真菌多样性和污染程度高,应考虑职业暴露于真菌毒素的问题。应采取一种健康方法来解决这些问题,以防止受真菌污染的咖啡作物和咖啡豆被食用,更具体地说,要避免广泛的唑类耐药性。