Jacobsen Henning, Katzmarzyk Maeva, Higdon Melissa M, Jiménez Viviana Cobos, Sitaras Ioannis, Bar-Zeev Naor, Knoll Maria Deloria
Department of Viral Immunology, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
International Vaccine Access Center, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;10(10):1757. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101757.
The emergence of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529), which correlated with dramatic losses in cross-neutralization capacity of post-vaccination sera, raised concerns about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infection and disease. Several clinically relevant sub-variants subsequently emerged rapidly.
We evaluated published and pre-print studies reporting sub-variant specific reductions in cross-neutralization compared to the prototype strain of SARS-CoV-2 and between sub-variants. Median fold-reduction across studies was calculated by sub-variant and vaccine platform.
Among 178 studies with post-vaccination data, after primary vaccination the sub-variant specific fold-reduction in neutralization capacity compared to the prototype antigen varied widely, from median 4.2-fold for BA.3 to 40.1-fold for BA.2.75; in boosted participants fold-reduction was similar for most sub-variants (5.3-fold to 7.0-fold); however, a more pronounced fold-change was observed for sub-variants related to BA.4 and BA.5 (10.4-fold to 14.2-fold). Relative to BA.1, the other Omicron sub-variants had similar neutralization capacity post-primary vaccination (range median 0.8-fold to 1.1-fold) and post-booster (0.9-fold to 1.4-fold) except for BA.4/5-related sub-variants which was higher (2.1-fold to 2.7-fold). Omicron sub-variant-specific responder rates were low post-primary vaccination (range median 28.0% to 65.9%) compared to the prototype (median 100%) but improved post-booster (range median 73.3% to 100%).
Fold-reductions in neutralization titers were comparable post-booster except for sub-variants related to BA.4 and BA.5, which had higher fold-reduction. Assessment after primary vaccination was not possible because of overall poor neutralization responses causing extreme heterogeneity. Considering large fold-decreases in neutralization titers relative to the parental strain for all Omicron sub-variants, vaccine effectiveness is very likely to be reduced against all Omicron sub-variants, and probably more so against variants related to BA.4 or BA.5.
奥密克戎变种(B.1.1.529)的出现与接种疫苗后血清交叉中和能力的显著下降相关,这引发了人们对新冠疫苗预防感染和疾病有效性的担忧。随后,几种具有临床相关性的亚变种迅速出现。
我们评估了已发表和预印本研究,这些研究报告了与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)原型毒株相比以及各亚变种之间亚变种特异性交叉中和作用的降低情况。通过亚变种和疫苗平台计算各项研究中的中位降低倍数。
在178项有接种疫苗后数据的研究中,初次接种疫苗后,与原型抗原相比,亚变种特异性中和能力的降低倍数差异很大,从BA.3的中位4.2倍到BA.2.75的40.1倍不等;在加强接种的参与者中,大多数亚变种的降低倍数相似(5.3倍至7.0倍);然而,与BA.4和BA.5相关的亚变种观察到更明显的变化倍数(10.4倍至14.2倍)。相对于BA.1,除了与BA.4/5相关的亚变种较高(2.1倍至2.7倍)外,其他奥密克戎亚变种在初次接种疫苗后(范围中位0.8倍至1.1倍)和加强接种后(0.9倍至1.4倍)具有相似的中和能力。与原型(中位100%)相比,奥密克戎亚变种特异性应答率在初次接种疫苗后较低(范围中位28.0%至65.9%),但在加强接种后有所改善(范围中位73.3%至100%)。
除了与BA.4和BA.5相关的亚变种降低倍数较高外,加强接种后中和效价的降低倍数具有可比性。由于总体中和反应较差导致极端异质性,初次接种疫苗后的评估无法进行。考虑到所有奥密克戎亚变种相对于亲本毒株的中和效价大幅下降,疫苗对所有奥密克戎亚变种的有效性很可能降低,对与BA.4或BA.5相关的变种可能更是如此。