Bartnikowska Agnieszka, Cieślik Grzegorz, Młodzik Mateusz, Garcia-Argibay Miguel
Radiotherapy Department, Oncology Center, Opole, Poland.
Institute of Physics, Opole University, Opole, Poland.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 May 19;27(2):189-197. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0027. eCollection 2022.
The usage of advanced radiotherapy techniques requires validation of a previously calculated dose with the precise delivery with a linear accelerator. This study aimed to review and evaluate new verification methods of dose distribution. Moreover, our purpose was to define an internal protocol of acceptance for in-vivo measurements of dose distribution.
This study included 43 treatment plans of prostate cancer calculated using the Monte Carlo algorithm. All plans were delivered using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique of advanced radiotherapy by the linear accelerator Elekta VersaHD. The dose distribution was verified using: MatriXX, iViewDose, and in-vivo measurements. The verification also included recalculation of fluence maps of quality assurance plans in another independent algorithm.
The acceptance criterion of 95% points of dose in agreement was found for pre-treatment verification using MatriXX; the average γ value was 99.09 ± 0.93 (SD) and 99.64 ± 0.35 (SD) for recalculation in the Collapse Cone algorithm. Moreover, using the second algorithm in the verification process showed a positive correlation = 0.58, p < 0.001. However, verification using iViewDose in a phantom and in-vivo did not meet this γ-pass rate.
Evaluation of gamma values for in-vivo measurements utilizing iViewDose software was helpful to establish an internal dosimetry protocol for prostate cancer treatments. We assumed value at a minimum of 50% points of the dose in agreement with the 3%/3 mm criterion as an acceptable compliance level. The recalculated dose distribution of QA plans in regard to the Collapse Cone algorithm in the other treatment planning system can be used as a pre-treatment verification method used by a medical physicist in their daily work. The effectiveness of use in iViewDose software, as a pre-treatment tool, is still debatable, unlike the MatriXX device.
先进放疗技术的应用需要通过直线加速器精确投送来验证先前计算的剂量。本研究旨在回顾和评估剂量分布的新验证方法。此外,我们的目的是定义体内剂量分布测量的内部验收方案。
本研究纳入了43个使用蒙特卡罗算法计算的前列腺癌治疗计划。所有计划均通过直线加速器Elekta VersaHD采用先进放疗的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)技术进行投送。使用MatriXX、iViewDose和体内测量来验证剂量分布。验证还包括在另一种独立算法中重新计算质量保证计划的注量图。
发现使用MatriXX进行治疗前验证时,剂量一致点的接受标准为95%;在坍缩锥算法中重新计算时,平均γ值分别为99.09±0.93(标准差)和99.64±0.35(标准差)。此外,在验证过程中使用第二种算法显示出正相关(r = 0.58,p < 0.001)。然而,在模体和体内使用iViewDose进行验证未达到该γ通过率。
利用iViewDose软件评估体内测量的γ值有助于建立前列腺癌治疗的内部剂量测定方案。我们将符合± /3mm标准的剂量至少50%点处的值作为可接受的合规水平。在其他治疗计划系统中针对坍缩锥算法重新计算的质量保证计划剂量分布可作为医学物理师日常工作中使用的治疗前验证方法。与MatriXX设备不同,iViewDose软件作为治疗前工具的使用效果仍存在争议。