Brown Amy, Tan Alex, Anable Lux, Callander Emily, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Pain Tilley
Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
James Cook University - Bebegu Yumba Campus, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 19;24:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.10.001. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The complexity of prostate cancer care can impact on patient understanding and participation in shared decision-making. This study used a survey-based approach to investigate patients' recall of their prostate cancer treatment, and more broadly, to understand the perceptions of patients and the general population of prostate cancer treatment.
The survey was completed by 236 patients with prostate cancer (PCa cohort) and 240 participants from the general population of Australia (GenPop cohort). Free-text comments from both cohorts were analysed using content analysis. The PCa cohort reported which treatments and image-guidance related procedures they had received. These patient-reports were compared to medical records and analysed using proportion agreement, kappa statistics and regression analysis.
135 (57%) PCa and 99 (41%) GenPop respondents provided at least one comment. Five major themes were identified by both cohorts: sharing experiences of treatment; preferences insights and reflections; mindsets; general commentary on the survey; and factors missing from the survey. There was overall good treatment recall amongst the PCa cohort, with proportions of correct recall ranging from 97.3% for chemotherapy to 66.8% for hormone therapy. There was a tendency for younger patients (<70 years old) to recall their hormone treatment more correctly.
Participant comments suggest the complexity of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, and the varying perceptions and experiences of participants with prostate cancer. Patients' recall overall was good for both treatment and image-guidance related procedures/approaches, however the poorer recall of hormone therapy requires further investigation.
前列腺癌护理的复杂性可能会影响患者对共同决策的理解和参与。本研究采用基于调查的方法来调查患者对其前列腺癌治疗的回忆,更广泛地说,是为了了解患者以及普通人群对前列腺癌治疗的看法。
236名前列腺癌患者(前列腺癌队列)和240名来自澳大利亚普通人群的参与者(普通人群队列)完成了该调查。使用内容分析法对两个队列的自由文本评论进行分析。前列腺癌队列报告了他们接受过的治疗以及与图像引导相关的程序。将这些患者报告与医疗记录进行比较,并使用比例一致性、kappa统计和回归分析进行分析。
135名(57%)前列腺癌患者和99名(41%)普通人群受访者至少提供了一条评论。两个队列都确定了五个主要主题:分享治疗经验;偏好、见解和反思;心态;对调查的总体评论;以及调查中遗漏的因素。前列腺癌队列总体上对治疗的回忆良好,正确回忆的比例从化疗的97.3%到激素治疗的66.8%不等。年轻患者(<70岁)更倾向于正确回忆他们的激素治疗。
参与者的评论表明了前列腺癌诊断和治疗的复杂性,以及前列腺癌患者不同的看法和经历。患者对治疗和与图像引导相关的程序/方法的总体回忆良好,然而,激素治疗回忆较差需要进一步调查。