• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人动机对亲环境行为的感知努力和表现的影响。

The impact of personal motivation on perceived effort and performance of pro-environmental behaviors.

作者信息

Dreijerink Lieke, Handgraaf Michel, Antonides Gerrit

机构信息

Energy Transition Studies, TNO, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Urban Economics Chairgroup, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:977471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977471. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977471
PMID:36304880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9595114/
Abstract

In order to minimize climate change it is important that people take up a sustainable lifestyle. Sustainable lifestyles call for pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) in several domains, such as in-home energy use, mobility, and consumption of food and goods. However, studies show that people often do not consistently behave pro-environmentally in all domains. In this study we investigated how a combination of personal motivation, and the difficulty and the perceived effort of a PEB, predicts the performance of PEBs in various domains, using a survey ( = 1,536). By means of Rasch analysis we identified the difficulty of 17 PEBs and estimated respondents' pro-environmental motivations. In addition, we investigated if performance of certain PEBs increased the probability of performing other PEBs. This way we could identify for each level of motivation which behaviors respondents were (probably) performing and which behaviors they did not yet perform, but would be least effortful new behaviors. Furthermore, using a non-recursive structural equation model we investigated the relations between perceived effort, PEB performance, motivation, underlying traits, and demographics. Results showed a feedback loop between motivation and perceived effort: when respondents were motivated they perceived behaviors as less effortful and also lower perception of effort was related to higher motivation. Our results imply that people mainly perform PEBs that fit their level of pro-environmental motivation and that they are inclined to do the things of which they can justify the effort they need to invest. This amount of effort seems quite similar for people: no one wants to invest too much effort, but people highly differ in how effortful they assess different behaviors. Our study thus indicates that rationalizations play a key role. Encouraging people to embrace more sustainable lifestyles may involve step-by-step increases in PEB performance. We propose that people should be encouraged to perform behaviors that are closest to their current motivation level in order for them to progress from performing easy to more difficult PEBs.

摘要

为了将气候变化降至最低,人们采取可持续的生活方式非常重要。可持续的生活方式要求在多个领域采取有利于环境的行为(PEB),例如家庭能源使用、出行以及食品和商品消费等领域。然而,研究表明,人们在所有领域的行为往往并不总是有利于环境的。在本研究中,我们通过一项调查(n = 1536),探究了个人动机、PEB的难度和感知努力程度的组合如何预测不同领域中PEB的表现。通过拉施分析,我们确定了17种PEB的难度,并估计了受访者的环保动机。此外,我们还研究了某些PEB的表现是否会增加执行其他PEB的可能性。通过这种方式,我们可以确定在每个动机水平上,受访者(可能)正在执行哪些行为,以及他们尚未执行但将是最省力的新行为。此外,我们使用非递归结构方程模型研究了感知努力、PEB表现、动机、潜在特质和人口统计学之间的关系。结果显示动机和感知努力之间存在反馈回路:当受访者有动机时,他们会觉得行为更省力,而较低的努力感知也与较高的动机相关。我们的研究结果表明,人们主要执行与其环保动机水平相匹配的PEB,并且他们倾向于做那些能够证明自己需要投入的努力是合理的事情。人们所需投入的努力程度似乎相当相似:没有人愿意投入过多努力,但人们对不同行为的努力程度评估差异很大。因此,我们的研究表明合理化起着关键作用。鼓励人们接受更可持续的生活方式可能需要逐步提高PEB的表现。我们建议应该鼓励人们执行最接近他们当前动机水平的行为,以便他们从执行简单的PEB过渡到执行更困难的PEB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/9595114/fa272e1b112d/fpsyg-13-977471-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/9595114/a75a3db89de4/fpsyg-13-977471-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/9595114/fa272e1b112d/fpsyg-13-977471-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/9595114/a75a3db89de4/fpsyg-13-977471-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efce/9595114/fa272e1b112d/fpsyg-13-977471-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of personal motivation on perceived effort and performance of pro-environmental behaviors.个人动机对亲环境行为的感知努力和表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:977471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977471. eCollection 2022.
2
Rationalizing Inconsistent Consumer Behavior. Understanding Pathways That Lead to Negative Spillover of Pro-environmental Behaviors in Daily Life.合理化不一致的消费者行为。理解导致日常生活中亲环境行为负面溢出的途径。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 17;12:583596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583596. eCollection 2021.
3
Drivers of pro-environmental behaviours among outdoor recreationists: The case of a recreational fishery in Western Canada.户外休闲者中亲环境行为的驱动因素:以加拿大西部的一个休闲渔业为例。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 1;289:112366. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112366. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
Organisational Climate and Pro-environmental Behaviours at Work: The Mediating Role of Personal Norms.工作中的组织氛围与亲环境行为:个人规范的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:635739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635739. eCollection 2021.
5
Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership and Employee's Pro-environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Passion and Autonomous Motivation.特定环境下的变革型领导与员工的亲环境行为:环境热情与自主动机的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01408. eCollection 2020.
6
Can work climate foster pro-environmental behavior inside and outside of the workplace?工作环境能否培养员工在工作内外的环保行为?
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 10;14(10):e0223774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223774. eCollection 2019.
7
How I See Me-A Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association Between Identities and Pro-environmental Behaviour.我眼中的自己——一项调查身份认同与亲环境行为之间关联的荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:582421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582421. eCollection 2021.
8
Curbing vehicular urban pollution in China: Investigating the usage intentionof public electric buses.遏制中国城市机动车污染:公共电动巴士使用意愿研究。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Sep 15;342:118066. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118066. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Workplace Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Identification's Sequential Mediation.环境企业社会责任与职场亲环境行为:人与组织适配和组织认同的序列中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10355. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610355.
10
The Role of Psychological Distance in Influencing Pro-environmental Behavior Spread: Perceived Justice Enforceability as a Moderator.心理距离在影响亲环境行为传播中的作用:感知正义可执行性作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 28;11:567093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567093. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationalizing Inconsistent Consumer Behavior. Understanding Pathways That Lead to Negative Spillover of Pro-environmental Behaviors in Daily Life.合理化不一致的消费者行为。理解导致日常生活中亲环境行为负面溢出的途径。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 17;12:583596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583596. eCollection 2021.
2
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.努力悖论:努力既昂贵又有价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Reviving Campbell's paradigm for attitude research.
复兴坎贝尔的态度研究范式。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;14(4):351-67. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366452. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
4
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
5
Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.形成预测未来行为的态度:态度与行为关系的元分析
Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;132(5):778-822. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778.
6
The intensity of motivation.动机的强度。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40:109-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.