• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记错是否会导致情绪诱饵的虚假警报?一种扩散模型研究。

Does misremembering drive false alarms for emotional lures? A diffusion model investigation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):1973-1989. doi: 10.1177/17470218221137347. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1177/17470218221137347
PMID:36305086
Abstract

Previous evidence has shown that, in a recognition memory task, emotion leads participants to make more false alarms and decreases response times (RTs) for false alarm responses. This pattern could arise because participants adopt more liberal responding for emotional stimuli and/or because emotional lures are more likely than neutral lures to produce misleading memory retrieval. Recently, Starns et al. designed a new recognition memory paradigm and found that the speed of memory errors shows the influence of misleading information resulting in unavoidable memory errors. This study investigates the basis of false alarms to emotional lures by testing predictions of the diffusion model for a recognition paradigm similar to that by Starns et al. Participants studied lists of emotional words and then completed an old-new recognition memory test. After each old-new decision, participants were asked to make a forced-choice recognition decision that provided a chance to correct possible errors on the preceding old-new decision. Under the assumption that emotion promotes misremembering, the diffusion model predicts that forced-choice accuracy should be lower for pairs with emotional versus neutral lures and that faster old-new errors should be associated with lower forced-choice accuracy. This study tested these predictions, providing theoretical insights into how emotion affects memory retrieval and further developing a new methodology for measuring recognition performance.

摘要

先前的证据表明,在识别记忆任务中,情绪会导致参与者产生更多的虚报,并降低对虚报反应的反应时间(RT)。这种模式可能是因为参与者对情绪刺激采用了更宽松的反应方式,或者因为情绪诱饵比中性诱饵更有可能产生误导性的记忆检索。最近,Starns 等人设计了一种新的识别记忆范式,发现记忆错误的速度受到误导信息的影响,从而导致不可避免的记忆错误。本研究通过测试扩散模型对类似于 Starns 等人的识别范式的预测,来研究对情绪诱饵的虚报的基础。参与者学习一系列情绪词汇,然后完成旧新识别记忆测试。在每次旧新决策之后,参与者被要求进行强制选择识别决策,这为纠正前面的旧新决策中的可能错误提供了机会。假设情绪会促进错误记忆,扩散模型预测,对于带有情绪诱饵和中性诱饵的对,强制选择准确性应该更低,并且更快的旧新错误应该与更低的强制选择准确性相关。本研究检验了这些预测,为情绪如何影响记忆检索提供了理论见解,并进一步开发了一种新的测量识别性能的方法。

相似文献

1
Does misremembering drive false alarms for emotional lures? A diffusion model investigation.记错是否会导致情绪诱饵的虚假警报?一种扩散模型研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):1973-1989. doi: 10.1177/17470218221137347. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
Memory error speed predicts subsequent accuracy for recognition misses but not false alarms.记忆错误速度可以预测随后的识别漏报准确性,但不能预测误报准确性。
Memory. 2023 Nov;31(10):1340-1351. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2265613. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
False (or biased) memory: Emotion and working memory capacity effects in the DRM paradigm.错误(或偏差)记忆: DRM 范式中的情绪和工作记忆容量效应。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1443-1463. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01298-y. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Memory distortion for orthographically associated words in individuals with depressive symptoms.抑郁症状个体对正字法相关单词的记忆扭曲。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104330. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104330. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
The speed of memory errors shows the influence of misleading information: Testing the diffusion model and discrete-state models.记忆错误的速度显示了误导性信息的影响:检验扩散模型和离散状态模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 May;102:21-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Investigating a bias account of emotional false memories using a criterion warning and force choice restrictions at retrieval.
Cogn Emot. 2025 May;39(3):574-589. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2379824. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
7
Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?充满情感的诱饵对错误记忆免疫吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):328-38. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.328.
8
Emotional false memories: the impact of response bias under speeded retrieval conditions.情绪性错误记忆:快速检索条件下反应偏差的影响
Cogn Emot. 2025 Mar;39(2):445-452. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2401611. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
9
How social interactions affect emotional memory accuracy: Evidence from collaborative retrieval and social contagion paradigms.社交互动如何影响情绪记忆的准确性:来自协作检索和社会传染范式的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):706-16. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0597-8.
10
When social influences reduce false recognition memory: A case of categorically related information.当社会影响降低错误识别记忆时:一种与类别相关的信息的情况。
Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104279. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104279. Epub 2020 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Heightened familiarity drives the negative retrieval bias in depression: Evidence from the PRISM task.高度熟悉引发抑郁症中的负性提取偏差:来自PRISM任务的证据。
Comput Brain Behav. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s42113-025-00252-w.
2
Examining disgust learning through category conditioning: Evidence from trial-unique presentations and oculomotor avoidance.通过类别条件作用检验厌恶学习:来自独特试验呈现和眼球运动回避的证据。
Learn Behav. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.3758/s13420-025-00669-0.
3
Sometimes memory misleads: Variants of the error-speed effect strengthen the evidence for systematically misleading memory signals in recognition memory.
有时记忆会产生误导:错误速度效应的变体强化了识别记忆中存在系统性误导记忆信号的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):294-305. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02534-z. Epub 2024 Jul 1.