Mulligan Kathleen M, Zheng David X, Xu James R, Cullison Christopher R, Cwalina Thomas B, Beveridge Mara G, Scott Jeffrey F
Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 May;315(4):1033-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02433-0. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Survival outcomes for metastatic melanoma have drastically improved with the advent of immunotherapy. Access to ongoing immunotherapy clinical trials has become increasingly important to patients with advanced disease. We sought to quantify geographic disparities in access to these trials by U.S. division, region, urban/rural status, and median income. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for interventional immunotherapy trials for metastatic melanoma from 2015 to 2021 and identified U.S. zip codes for each participating trial site. ArcGIS was used to calculate the one-way driving time from each zip code to the nearest treatment center. Melanoma burden in each zip code outside a 60 min driving radius was calculated by multiplying population by the corresponding state's cancer-specific mortality rate. χ tests were used to test for significance between census regions, divisions, and urban vs. rural zip codes, while logistic regression was used to quantify risk of poor access with median income. Across 148 trials, 4844 treatment centers were located in 1102 unique zip codes. 9010 zip codes were located greater than one-hour driving time from the nearest clinical trial. Southern regions were most likely to have poor access of all regions (p < 0.001), and rural status also significantly correlated with poor access (p < 0.001). For every $10,000 increase in median income, the likelihood of a zip code being within 60 min from a trial increased by 1.315. While immunotherapy continue to improve survival outcomes for metastatic melanoma, geographic access to clinical trials investigating these therapies remains a challenge for a significant proportion of the U.S. population.
随着免疫疗法的出现,转移性黑色素瘤的生存结果有了显著改善。对于晚期疾病患者来说,参与正在进行的免疫疗法临床试验变得越来越重要。我们试图通过美国分区、地区、城乡状况和收入中位数来量化参与这些试验的地理差异。我们在ClinicalTrials.gov上搜索了2015年至2021年期间转移性黑色素瘤的介入性免疫疗法试验,并确定了每个参与试验地点的美国邮政编码。使用ArcGIS计算从每个邮政编码到最近治疗中心的单程驾车时间。通过将人口乘以相应州的癌症特异性死亡率,计算出驾车半径60分钟以外每个邮政编码区域的黑色素瘤负担。使用χ检验来检验人口普查区域、分区以及城市与农村邮政编码之间的显著性差异,同时使用逻辑回归来量化收入中位数与获得治疗机会差的风险。在148项试验中,4844个治疗中心分布在1102个独特的邮政编码区域。9010个邮政编码区域距离最近的临床试验驾车时间超过一小时。在所有地区中,南部地区获得治疗的机会最差(p < 0.001),农村地区与获得治疗机会差也显著相关(p < 0.001)。收入中位数每增加1万美元,邮政编码区域距离试验在60分钟内的可能性就增加1.315。虽然免疫疗法继续改善转移性黑色素瘤的生存结果,但对于很大一部分美国人口来说,获得研究这些疗法的临床试验的地理机会仍然是一个挑战。