Ansell B M, Major G, Liyanage S P, Gumpel J M, Seifert M H, Mathews J A, Engler C
Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Oct;37(5):436-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.5.436.
A double-blind, cross-over comparison of Naprosyn (naproxen) 750 mg daily and Butacote (enteric-coated phenylbutazone) 300 mg daily was carried out in a multi-centre trial. Twenty-five patients, mostly male and under 40 years of age, were entered. After a 2-week period in which any existing anti-inflammatory drugs were tailed off, patients were entered into the trial and treated for 1 month with each drug. Patients were assessed at 4-weekly intervals. Both drugs significantly reduced morning stiffness. Morning pain and discomfort and wall-tragus distance were also significantly reduced by both drugs during the trial. Results of the Schober test showed improvement during both treatment periods. There were no overall statistically significant differences between the effects of the 2 drugs on objective parameters. However, overall subjective assessment of symptoms showed a greater improvement on Butacote. Treatment preferences by physician and subjective assessment by the patient both favoured Butacote but the difference between the 2 drugs was not statistically significant. Side effects were mostly of a minor nature. One patient had to discontinue the trial, due to indigestion while taking Butacote.
在一项多中心试验中,对每日服用750毫克萘普生(Naprosyn)和每日服用300毫克肠溶型保泰松(Butacote)进行了双盲交叉比较。入组了25名患者,大多数为40岁以下男性。在为期2周的时间里逐渐停用任何现有的抗炎药物后,患者进入试验,每种药物治疗1个月。每隔4周对患者进行评估。两种药物均显著降低了晨僵。在试验期间,两种药物还显著减轻了早晨的疼痛和不适以及耳垂-颞骨距离。Schober试验结果显示在两个治疗期均有改善。两种药物对客观参数的影响在总体上无统计学显著差异。然而,症状的总体主观评估显示使用保泰松有更大改善。医生的治疗偏好和患者的主观评估均倾向于保泰松,但两种药物之间的差异无统计学意义。副作用大多较轻。一名患者因服用保泰松时出现消化不良而不得不退出试验。