• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Pandemic Management in the Context of Everyday Care and the need for Good Care: Results and Recommendations for Action from the Coronacare Workshops].[日常护理背景下的大流行管理与优质护理需求:冠状病毒护理研讨会的结果与行动建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jan;85(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/a-1918-0437. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
CoronaCare study protocol: an ethnographic study of the risks to and potential for social health during the COVID-19 pandemic.科罗那关怀研究方案:COVID-19 大流行期间社会健康风险及潜力的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 13;11(10):e048212. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048212.
3
A methodological approach to intra-action reviews - application and adaptation of existing global guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic response in Ireland, 2021.一种互动式评论的方法学途径——2021 年爱尔兰 COVID-19 大流行应对期间对现有全球指南的应用和调整。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Mar;28(13). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.13.2200475.
4
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Strengthening the social resilience of people living at the intersection of precariousness and migration during pandemics: action recommendations developed in Munich, Germany.在大流行病期间,加强处于脆弱性和移民交叉点的人的社会复原力:在德国慕尼黑制定的行动建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;11:1201215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1201215. eCollection 2023.
6
Exploring the relationship between working from home, mental and physical health and wellbeing: a systematic review.探索在家工作、身心健康和幸福感之间的关系:系统综述。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 May;11(4):1-100. doi: 10.3310/AHFF6175.
7
Sexual expression and the COVID-19 pandemic: The future of sexual intimacy after the COVID-19 pandemic.性行为与 COVID-19 大流行:COVID-19 大流行后性亲密的未来。
Psychiatriki. 2023 Jul 19;34(2):99-101. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2023.009. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
A Reminder of Skin Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间对皮肤癌的提醒。
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2021 Apr;291(1):58.
10
Elder financial abuse and the COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action through training programmes?老年人金融虐待与新冠疫情:通过培训项目采取行动的呼吁?
Psychiatriki. 2022 Dec 7;33(4):333-334. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.090. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[General Practitioners' Experiences with COVID-19: a Survey After the First Wave of the Pandemic in March/April 2020].[全科医生应对新冠疫情的经验:2020年3月/4月第一波疫情后的一项调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Dec;85(12):1183-1191. doi: 10.1055/a-2042-9715. Epub 2023 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
[Concern about Covid-19 Infection and the Risk of Burnout Symptoms: a Study of Caregiver Stress in Brandenburg Nursing Homes During the Covid-19 Pandemic].[对新冠病毒感染的担忧与职业倦怠症状风险:一项关于新冠疫情期间勃兰登堡养老院护理人员压力的研究]
Psychiatr Prax. 2023 Oct;50(7):353-360. doi: 10.1055/a-2019-6495. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Finding common (research) ground between general practitioners and neuroscientists: the vital role of knowledge circulation in closing the evidence-to-practice gap.在全科医生和神经科学家之间找到共同(研究)基础:知识传播在缩小证据与实践差距方面的重要作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 20;22(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01560-3.
3
CoronaCare study protocol: an ethnographic study of the risks to and potential for social health during the COVID-19 pandemic.科罗那关怀研究方案:COVID-19 大流行期间社会健康风险及潜力的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 13;11(10):e048212. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048212.
4
Will the demands by the covid-19 pandemic increase the intent to quit the profession of long-term care managers? A repeated cross-sectional study in Germany.新冠大流行的需求是否会增加长期护理管理者离职的意愿?德国的一项重复横断面研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):e431-e434. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab081.
5
Pflege in Zeiten von Corona: Zentrale Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Querschnittsbefragung vollstationärer Pflegeheime.新冠疫情期间的护理:德国住院护理院全国性横断面调查的主要结果
Pflege. 2020;33(5):265-275. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000760.
6
Framing post-pandemic preparedness: Comparing eight European plans.后疫情时代准备工作的构建:比较八个欧洲计划。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Jan;13(1):99-114. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1149202. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
[Competence in dealing with uncertainty: lessons to learn from the influenza pandemic (H1N1) 2009].[应对不确定性的能力:从2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行中汲取的教训]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Dec;53(12):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1165-1.
8
[Pandemic preparedness planning. What did we learn from the influenza pandemic (H1N1) 2009?].[大流行防范规划。我们从2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行中学到了什么?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Dec;53(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1162-4.
9
Moral experience and ethical reflection: can ethnography reconcile them? A quandary for "the new bioethics.道德体验与伦理反思:人种志能调和二者吗?“新生物伦理学”面临的一个困境
Daedalus. 1999 Fall;128(4):69-97.
10
Stories as case knowledge: case knowledge as stories.作为案例知识的故事:作为故事的案例知识。
Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):862-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01016.x.

[日常护理背景下的大流行管理与优质护理需求:冠状病毒护理研讨会的结果与行动建议]

[Pandemic Management in the Context of Everyday Care and the need for Good Care: Results and Recommendations for Action from the Coronacare Workshops].

作者信息

Holmberg Christine, Eich-Krohm Astrid, Ringkamp Daniela, König Franziska, Weigt Julia, Paul Joshua, Apfelbacher Christian, Silberzahn-Jandt Gudrun, Großmann Sandy, Heidecker Lisa-Sophie, Elsbernd Astrid, Bergholz Andreas, Merz Sibille

机构信息

Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Jan;85(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/a-1918-0437. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1055/a-1918-0437
PMID:36307104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11248295/
Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic, officially declared in March 2020 by the WHO, poses major challenges to public, private, and occupational life. CoronaCare is an ethnographic research project that investigates the everyday life of people during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany with a particular focus on social health. The aim of the project was to develop recommendations for pandemic preparedness planning focusing on expanding social health care. Through a series of workshops conducted between June and November 2021 with stakeholders from the fields of science, health and social administration drawn from both local and state levels, care institutions and social associations, the research team developed specific recommendations for pandemic preparedness and response on the basis of empirically substantiated vignettes demonstrating key tensions in caring practices. These tensions illustrate that pandemic management must be understood as a so-called wicked problem in which there are only relational rather than clear-cut, ultimate solutions. As such, the recommendations developed in the workshops point to the imperative to 1. recognize the irresolvable tension between measures to contain the pandemic in planning pandemic management and the human desire to care and be cared for; 2. understand and manage pandemics at the community level; 3. aim for close collaboration between actors at the local health, social, and family level; and 4. create spaces for ethical reflection on good care during a pandemic and develop context-specific strategies for action. For pandemic preparedness and management as a 'wicked problem', this means that measures should be disseminated as recommendations rather than regulations in order to have some leeway that enables care to be tailored to individual needs. They should be accompanied by stable guidance for action as well as regular training for staff. The workshop formats can be understood as an example of multidimensional knowledge transfer in a socially challenging situation.

摘要

2020年3月世界卫生组织正式宣布的新冠疫情,给公众生活、私人生活和职业生活带来了重大挑战。“新冠关怀”是一个民族志研究项目,调查德国新冠疫情期间人们的日常生活,特别关注社会健康。该项目的目的是制定大流行防范规划的建议,重点是扩大社会医疗保健。通过2021年6月至11月与来自地方和州各级的科学、卫生和社会管理领域、护理机构和社会协会的利益相关者举办的一系列研讨会,研究团队在实证支持的案例基础上,针对大流行防范和应对制定了具体建议,这些案例展示了护理实践中的关键紧张关系。这些紧张关系表明,大流行管理必须被理解为一个所谓的棘手问题,其中只有关系性的而非明确的最终解决方案。因此,研讨会上制定的建议指出,必须:1. 认识到在规划大流行管理时控制疫情的措施与人类关怀和被关怀的愿望之间无法解决的紧张关系;2. 在社区层面理解和管理大流行;3. 旨在地方卫生、社会和家庭层面的行为者之间密切合作;4. 为大流行期间对优质护理的伦理反思创造空间,并制定针对具体情况的行动策略。对于作为“棘手问题”的大流行防范和管理而言,这意味着措施应以建议而非法规的形式传播,以便有一定的回旋余地,使护理能够根据个人需求进行调整。它们应伴有稳定的行动指南以及对工作人员的定期培训。研讨会形式可被理解为在具有社会挑战性的情况下进行多维度知识转移的一个例子。