• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prognostic prediction models for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: protocol for a scoping review.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复的预后预测模型:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e061420. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061420.
2
Scoping review of radiologic assessment and prognostic impact of skeletal muscle sarcopenia in patients undergoing endovascular repair for aortic disease.主动脉疾病血管内修复患者骨骼肌减少症的影像学评估及预后影响的范围回顾。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1407-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis of Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.Meta 分析和 Meta 回归分析在破裂性腹主动脉瘤血管内和开放修复治疗结局中的应用。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis on early mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in females in urgent and elective settings.在紧急和择期情况下女性腹主动脉瘤修复术后早期死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):1082-1088.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.040. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
5
A systematic review of anatomic predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm remodeling after endovascular repair.血管腔内修复术后腹主动脉瘤重塑的解剖学预测因素的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1777-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.071. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Meta-analysis of phase-specific survival after elective endovascular versus surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm from randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.择期血管内与手术修复腹主动脉瘤的随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的特定阶段生存的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1464-1472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.041. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.血管外科学会治疗腹主动脉瘤患者的实践指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
8
Systematic review of the results of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in octogenarians.对 80 岁以上人群行开窗型腔内血管修复术的结果的系统回顾。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Feb;106(2):106-117. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0032. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Young.青年腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复对比的系统评价及Meta分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr;32(2):276-289. doi: 10.1177/15266028231179419. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Editor's Choice - Endovascular vs. Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Updated Peri-operative and Long Term Data of Randomised Controlled Trials.编辑精选 - 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的比较:随机对照试验更新围手术期和长期数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):385-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
3
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
4
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Editor's Choice - The Implications of Non-compliance to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.编辑精选 - 不符合血管内动脉瘤修复监测要求的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;55(4):492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.030. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.血管外科学会治疗腹主动脉瘤患者的实践指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
8
A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance.腔内修复术后再次干预预测因素的系统评价:风险分层监测指南
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Aug;51(6):417-428. doi: 10.1177/1538574417712648. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
Systematic review of mortality risk prediction models in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.系统评价血管内腹主动脉瘤手术时代的死亡率风险预测模型。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):964-976. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10571.
10
Effectiveness of open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in population settings: A systematic review of statewide databases.在人群中开放手术与血管腔内修复腹主动脉瘤的有效性:对全州数据库的系统评价
Surgery. 2017 Oct;162(4):707-720. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

血管内腹主动脉瘤修复的预后预测模型:系统评价方案。

Prognostic prediction models for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e061420. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061420.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061420
PMID:36307155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9621180/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has a marked short-term advantage over open surgical repair in managing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA); however, this benefit is lost in the long term. The current trend towards stratified medicine has given rise to diverse prognostic prediction models and scoring systems for EVAR. These models could act as decision support tools that employ patient and operative factors, to improve long-term outcomes. Past literature evaluated and compared model performance for predicting one outcome, for example, mortality. None were deemed competent for clinical application. The proposed study will use a scoping review approach to capture literature on prognostic modelling in EVAR for all predictable outcomes. The results are anticipated to inform future research, identify knowledge gaps, and assist in determining the potential of models for clinical use.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The proposed study will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping Reviews as a framework for conducting the review. PubMed Central, Embase and Cochrane Library will be searched and screened for peer-reviewed studies on prognostic modelling for EVAR, published between 2000 and 2022. No limits exist on predictor variables used and outcomes predicted by the model for inclusion, provided they apply to AAA patients managed with EVAR. Data will be abstracted using a charting form based on the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies guidelines and PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. The Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis checklist will be used to critically appraise included studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Since scoping reviews cover secondary data from published literature, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at key conferences.

摘要

简介

血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)在治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)方面具有明显的短期优势,优于开放手术修复;然而,这种优势在长期内会丧失。当前,分层医学的趋势催生了多种用于 EVAR 的预后预测模型和评分系统。这些模型可以作为决策支持工具,利用患者和手术因素来改善长期结果。过去的文献评估和比较了用于预测单一结果(例如死亡率)的模型性能。但没有一个被认为具有临床应用的能力。拟议的研究将使用范围综述方法来捕获关于所有可预测结果的 EVAR 预后建模的文献。预计研究结果将为未来的研究提供信息,确定知识空白,并有助于确定模型在临床应用中的潜力。

方法和分析

拟议的研究将使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展范围综述作为进行综述的框架。将在 PubMed Central、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 中搜索和筛选 2000 年至 2022 年期间发表的关于 EVAR 预后建模的同行评审研究。纳入的预测变量和模型预测的结果没有限制,只要它们适用于接受 EVAR 治疗的 AAA 患者。将使用基于系统评价预测模型研究的关键评估和数据提取指南以及 PRISMA 系统评价指南的图表表格来提取数据。将使用预测模型风险偏倚评估工具和用于个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型的透明报告清单来批判性地评估纳入的研究。

伦理和传播

由于范围综述涵盖了已发表文献中的二级数据,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和在关键会议上的演示进行传播。