The Eye Center, Southern College of Optometry Memphis, TN, USA.
Department of Vision & Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Jun;46(3):101773. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101773. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a clinical sign that has been associated with dry eye disease (DED) and contact lens discomfort (CLD). This study describes the development, validation and graders' preference of a new photographic scale for LWE, the Photographic Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (PLWE) scale.
The PLWE grading scale was developed using LWE images selected from 57 screened patients (≥18 years of age) with confirmed LWE in both eyes. To validate the PLWE scale, a set including 20 images showing varying degrees of LWE from none to severe was chosen. To assess grading validity and grading reliability, observers were asked to grade the selected images using the PLWE and another commonly used subjective LWE grading protocol (Korb) on two separate sessions.
The mean grade (±SD) of all images was not statistically significant different between the PLWE scale (1.55 ± 0.44) and the alternative grading scale (Korb, 1.47 ± 0.54) (ANOVA F1, p > 0.05). The average difference from the mean of all graders was 0.03 ± 0.53 using the PLWE scale and 0.06 ± 0.57 when using the Korb protocol (ANOVA F1, p > 0.05). The Coefficient of Repeatability was 1.04 and 1.12 for the PLWE and Korb scales (p > 0.05). Ninety-five percent of the graders found PLWE easier to use than Korb and the same percentage would consider using the PLWE scale in clinical practice.
The format of the PLWE is similar to other anterior segment visual grading scales and this study revealed an ease of use preference for employing the PLWE by the graders. The presence of LWE has been associated with DED and CLD, and the addition of this new photographic scale could facilitate clinical judgement and record keeping of LWE in clinical practice.
眼睑擦拭上皮病(LWE)是一种与干眼疾病(DED)和隐形眼镜不适(CLD)相关的临床体征。本研究描述了一种新的 LWE 摄影量表——摄影眼睑擦拭上皮病(PLWE)量表的开发、验证和分级者偏好。
使用从 57 名经筛选的双侧确诊 LWE 患者(≥18 岁)的 LWE 图像开发 PLWE 分级量表。为了验证 PLWE 量表,选择了一组 20 张显示从无到严重程度不等的 LWE 的图像。为了评估分级有效性和分级可靠性,要求观察者使用 PLWE 和另一种常用的主观 LWE 分级方案(Korb)在两个单独的会话中对选定的图像进行分级。
所有图像的平均等级(±SD)在 PLWE 量表(1.55±0.44)和替代分级量表(Korb,1.47±0.54)之间没有统计学差异(ANOVA F1,p>0.05)。使用 PLWE 量表时,所有分级者的平均差异平均值为 0.03±0.53,而使用 Korb 方案时为 0.06±0.57(ANOVA F1,p>0.05)。PLWE 和 Korb 量表的可重复性系数分别为 1.04 和 1.12(p>0.05)。95%的分级者认为 PLWE 比 Korb 更容易使用,同样百分比的分级者会考虑在临床实践中使用 PLWE 量表。
PLWE 的格式与其他眼前节视觉分级量表相似,本研究显示分级者对使用 PLWE 的易用性偏好。LWE 的存在与 DED 和 CLD 有关,这种新的摄影量表的出现可以促进临床判断和临床实践中 LWE 的记录。