• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中亚氏膜间角膜磨镶术微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣的厚度预测性和形态学比较。

Comparison of corneal flap thickness predictability and architecture between femtosecond laser and sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.

机构信息

Al-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Ibn Sina University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2023 May;43(5):1553-1558. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02551-8. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-022-02551-8
PMID:36307607
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of the study is to assess and compare the corneal flap thickness predictability and uniformity between Visumax femtosecond laser and Moria sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis procedure to correct myopic and myopic astigmatism refractive errors.

METHODS

One hundred eyes from 100 patients were enrolled in this study. Only one eye (right eye) of each patient was chosen for this study. They were divided into two groups of equal size (50 each). Target flap thickness was 90 μm. Flap thickness was measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 7 specified positions at 3 months postoperative.

RESULTS

For femtosecond laser group, the average central flap thickness (CFT) was 91.35 µm ± 4.97. There was no statistically significant difference between the target flap thickness and the resultant flap thickness (p = 0.12). When the central, nasal and temporal thicknesses in the same flap were compared, there was no statistically significant difference among these measurements (p = 0.9). For the microkeratome group, CFT was 102.18 µm ± 5.63. There was statistically significant difference between the target flap thickness and the resultant flap thickness (p = 0.001). The central, nasal and temporal thicknesses were compared and there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is among few studies in the literature comparing femtosecond laser flap to SBK microkeratome flap. Femtosecond laser creates more predictable flap thickness and more uniform flap architecture. Trial registration Trial registration number: NCT04684888. Trial Registration date: December 2020. Registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov .

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在评估和比较 Visumax 飞秒激光与 Moria 亚氏层间角膜磨镶微角膜刀在 LASIK 手术中矫正近视和近视散光屈光不正时的角膜瓣厚度预测性和均匀性。

方法

本研究纳入 100 例(100 只眼)患者。每位患者仅选择一只眼(右眼)进行本研究。将患者分为两组,每组 50 例。目标瓣厚度为 90μm。术后 3 个月,通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描在 7 个指定位置测量瓣厚度。

结果

对于飞秒激光组,平均中央瓣厚度(CFT)为 91.35μm±4.97μm。目标瓣厚度与实际瓣厚度之间无统计学差异(p=0.12)。同一瓣的中央、鼻侧和颞侧厚度比较,这些测量值之间无统计学差异(p=0.9)。对于微角膜刀组,CFT 为 102.18μm±5.63μm。目标瓣厚度与实际瓣厚度之间存在统计学差异(p=0.001)。中央、鼻侧和颞侧厚度比较,差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。

结论

本研究是少数比较飞秒激光瓣与 SBK 微角膜刀瓣的文献研究之一。飞秒激光可产生更可预测的瓣厚度和更均匀的瓣结构。试验注册号:NCT04684888。试验注册日期:2020 年 12 月。注册于 www.clinicaltrials.gov。

临床试验

无。

相似文献

1
Comparison of corneal flap thickness predictability and architecture between femtosecond laser and sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.飞秒激光与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中亚氏膜间角膜磨镶术微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣的厚度预测性和形态学比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 May;43(5):1553-1558. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02551-8. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.
3
[Comparison of cornea flap made by femtosecond laser and microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis].[飞秒激光与微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣在准分子原位角膜磨镶术中的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;49(4):305-8.
4
IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.飞秒激光角膜层间光动力治疗与机械角膜板层刀制瓣在 LASIK 治疗近视中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):15-24. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111228-02.
5
[Comparison of visual outcomes between corneal topography-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a network meta-analysis].角膜地形图引导的飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及近视散光的视觉效果比较:一项网状Meta分析
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 11;60(12):1004-1012. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240108-00014.
6
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)矫正近视的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD009799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009799.pub2.
7
Higher Order Aberrations and Visual Outcomes in Wavefront-Optimized Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis: Flap Creation Using Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome.波前优化的准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术(SBK)中的高阶像差与视觉效果:飞秒激光与机械微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣的比较
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2015 Jul-Aug;4(4):197-203. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000081.
8
Visumax femtolasik versus Moria M2 microkeratome in mild to moderate myopia: efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrometric changes and flap thickness predictability.Visumax飞秒激光与Moria M2微型角膜刀治疗轻至中度近视的疗效、安全性、可预测性、像差变化及瓣厚度可预测性比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0520-5.
9
To study the anatomic and intraoperative factors responsible for gas bubble migration in the anterior chamber during femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) flap creation.研究飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)制作角膜瓣过程中前房气泡迁移的解剖学及术中相关因素。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):1000-1004. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3098_23. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
10
[Analysis of flap thickness by anterior segment optical coherence tomography in different flap preparation styles of excimer laser surgery].[准分子激光手术不同瓣制作方式下角膜瓣厚度的眼前节光学相干断层扫描分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Mar;46(3):203-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Refractive Surgery: An Overview.屈光手术的最新进展:综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 2;18:2467-2472. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S481421. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of corneal epithelial thickness profile in dry eye patients, keratoconus suspect, and healthy eyes.比较干眼症患者、疑似圆锥角膜患者和健康人眼角膜上皮厚度分布。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;30(6):1506-1511. doi: 10.1177/1120672120952034. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
3
Visumax femtolasik versus Moria M2 microkeratome in mild to moderate myopia: efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrometric changes and flap thickness predictability.
Visumax飞秒激光与Moria M2微型角膜刀治疗轻至中度近视的疗效、安全性、可预测性、像差变化及瓣厚度可预测性比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0520-5.
4
Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200 femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome.使用FS200飞秒激光和Moria SBK微型角膜刀对角膜瓣厚度的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):273-7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.14. eCollection 2014.
5
Comparison of the flaps made by femtosecond laser and automated keratomes for sub-bowman keratomileusis.比较飞秒激光和自动角膜刀制作的亚层间角膜磨镶术角膜瓣。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jul;126(13):2440-4.
6
Assessment of accuracy and repeatability of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and reproducibility of measurements using a customised software program.使用定制软件程序评估眼前节光学相干断层扫描的准确性和可重复性以及测量的可再现性。
Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):432-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00724.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
7
LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction.准分子原位角膜磨镶术的世界文献综述:生活质量与患者满意度
Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037.
8
Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视和散光:安全性与有效性:美国眼科学会报告
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jan;109(1):175-87. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00966-6.
9
Overview of refractive surgery.屈光手术概述。
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Oct 1;64(7):1183-90.