Sobell M B, Brochu S, Sobell L C, Roy J, Stevens J A
Addict Behav. 1987;12(2):113-28. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90018-9.
The methodology of alcohol treatment outcome studies published during two sequential intervals from 1976 through mid-1984 is critically reviewed. Although considerable methodological improvements have occurred over time, major methodological deficiencies continue to characterize much of the literature, with inadequate reporting of subjects' pretreatment characteristics (e.g., severity of dependence) being the most striking problem. Pervasive differences across studies regarding the types of data gathered and the ways in which findings are reported seriously impede attempts to compare studies and weaken the types of conclusions that can be drawn about treatment efficacy in general. It is suggested that journal editors establish standards of reporting for follow-up studies.
对1976年至1984年年中两个连续时间段发表的酒精治疗结果研究方法进行了批判性综述。尽管随着时间的推移,方法上有了相当大的改进,但主要的方法缺陷仍然是许多文献的特征,其中对受试者治疗前特征(如依赖程度)的报告不足是最突出的问题。各研究在收集的数据类型和报告结果的方式上存在普遍差异,这严重阻碍了比较研究的尝试,并削弱了一般情况下可以得出的关于治疗效果的结论类型。建议期刊编辑为随访研究制定报告标准。