School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Mar 16;38(3):377-393. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac091.
In recent years, the literature on public health interventions and health outcomes in the context of epidemic and pandemic response has grown immensely. However, relatively few of these studies have situated their findings within the institutional, political, organizational and governmental (IPOG) context in which interventions and outcomes exist. This conceptual mapping scoping study synthesized the published literature on the impact of IPOG factors on epidemic and pandemic response and critically examined definitions and uses of the terms IPOG in this literature. This research involved a comprehensive search of four databases across the social, health and biomedical sciences as well as multi-level eligibility screening conducted by two independent reviewers. Data on the temporal, geographic and topical range of studies were extracted, then descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize these data. Hybrid inductive and deductive qualitative analysis of the full-text articles was conducted to critically analyse the definitions and uses of these terms in the literature. The searches retrieved 4918 distinct articles; 65 met the inclusion criteria and were thus reviewed. These articles were published from 2004 to 2022, were mostly written about COVID-19 (61.5%) and most frequently engaged with the concept of governance (36.9%) in relation to epidemic and pandemic response. Emergent themes related to the variable use of the investigated terms, the significant increase in relevant literature published amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a lack of consistent definitions used across all four terms: institutions, politics, organizations and governance. This study revealed opportunities for health systems researchers to further engage in interdisciplinary work with fields such as law and political science, to become more forthright in defining factors that shape responses to epidemics and pandemics and to develop greater consistency in using these IPOG terms in order to lessen confusion among a rapidly growing body of literature.
近年来,关于在流行病和大流行应对背景下的公共卫生干预措施和健康结果的文献大量增加。然而,这些研究中相对较少的研究将其发现置于干预措施和结果存在的制度、政治、组织和政府(IPOG)背景中。这项概念映射范围研究综合了关于 IPOG 因素对流行病和大流行应对影响的已发表文献,并批判性地审查了文献中这些术语的定义和用法。这项研究涉及对社会、健康和生物医学科学领域的四个数据库进行全面搜索,以及由两名独立评审员进行的多层次资格筛选。提取了关于研究的时间、地理和主题范围的数据,然后计算描述性统计数据来总结这些数据。对全文文章进行混合归纳和演绎的定性分析,以批判性地分析文献中这些术语的定义和用法。搜索共检索到 4918 篇不同的文章;其中 65 篇符合纳入标准,因此进行了审查。这些文章发表于 2004 年至 2022 年,主要是关于 COVID-19(61.5%)的,并且最频繁地涉及与流行病和大流行应对相关的治理概念(36.9%)。与所研究术语的可变用法、COVID-19 大流行期间发表的相关文献大量增加以及这四个术语(机构、政治、组织和治理)没有一致的定义相关的主题浮现出来。这项研究为卫生系统研究人员提供了机会,使其能够与法律和政治学等领域进行更多的跨学科合作,更明确地定义影响对流行病和大流行的应对的因素,并在使用这些 IPOG 术语方面提高一致性,以减少快速增长的文献中的混淆。