Cultural, Behavioral, and Media Insights Centre, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL, 33602, United States.
Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211, LK Maastricht, Netherlands; Welfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300, Helsinki, Finland.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115783. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115783. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Power and politics are both critical concepts to engage with in health systems and policy research, as they impact actions, processes, and outcomes at all levels in health systems. Building on the conceptualization of health systems as social systems, we investigate how power and politics manifested in the Finnish health system during COVID-19, posing the following research question: in what ways did health system leaders and experts experience issues of power and politics during COVID-19, and how did power and politics impact health system governance? We completed online interviews with health system leaders and experts (n = 53) at the local, regional, and national level in Finland from March 2021 to February 2022. The analysis followed an iterative thematic analysis process in which the data guided the codebook. The results demonstrate that power and politics affected health system governance in Finland during COVID-19 in a multitude of ways. These can be summarized through the themes of credit and blame, frame contestation, and transparency and trust. Overall, political leaders at the national level were heavily involved in the governance of COVID-19 in Finland, which was perceived as having both negative and positive impacts. The politicization of the pandemic took health officials and civil servants by surprise, and events during the first year of COVID-19 in Finland reflect recurring vertical and horizontal power dynamics between local, regional, and national actors. The paper contributes to the growing call for power-focused health systems and policy research. The results suggest that analyses of pandemic governance and lessons learned are likely to leave out critical factors if left absent of an explicit analysis of power and politics, and that such analyses are needed to ensure accountability in health systems.
权力和政治都是卫生系统和政策研究中需要涉及的关键概念,因为它们会影响卫生系统各个层面的行动、过程和结果。基于将卫生系统概念化为社会系统,我们调查了权力和政治在 COVID-19 期间如何在芬兰卫生系统中表现出来,提出了以下研究问题:卫生系统的领导者和专家在 COVID-19 期间在哪些方面遇到了权力和政治问题,以及权力和政治如何影响卫生系统治理?我们于 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,在芬兰以线上的形式对当地、地区和国家层面的卫生系统领导者和专家(n=53)进行了采访。分析过程遵循迭代主题分析方法,即数据引导编码本。结果表明,权力和政治以多种方式影响了 COVID-19 期间芬兰的卫生系统治理。这些可以通过以下主题来概括:信誉和指责、框架争议以及透明度和信任。总的来说,国家层面的政治领导人深度参与了芬兰 COVID-19 的治理,这被认为产生了正反两方面的影响。大流行的政治化让卫生官员和公务员措手不及,芬兰 COVID-19 第一年的事件反映了地方、地区和国家行为体之间反复出现的垂直和水平权力动态。本文为越来越多呼吁关注权力的卫生系统和政策研究做出了贡献。研究结果表明,如果不明确分析权力和政治,对大流行治理和经验教训的分析很可能会遗漏关键因素,而此类分析对于确保卫生系统的问责制是必要的。