Suppr超能文献

发作性和慢性偏头痛患者发作间期C反应蛋白水平无变化:一项病例对照研究及文献综述

No change in interictal C-reactive protein levels in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine: A case-control study and literature review.

作者信息

Park Chae Gyu, Lee Sue Hyun, Chu Min Kyung

机构信息

Heart-Immune-Brain Network Research Center, Department of Life Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Laboratory of Immunology, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1021065. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1021065. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The levels of some migraine biomarkers differ between episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM), but information on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in EM and CM is conflicting. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate CRP levels in participants with EM and CM in comparison to those in healthy controls.

METHODS

Plasma CRP levels were evaluated by high-sensitivity CRP tests in female participants with EM ( = 174) and CM ( = 191) and healthy controls ( = 50).

RESULTS

The results showed no significant difference in CRP levels among the EM, CM, and control groups (median and interquartile range, 0.40 [0.15-0.70] mg/L vs. 0.40 [0.15-1.00] mg/L vs. 0.15 [0.15-0.90] mg/L, = 0.991). The ratio of individuals with elevated CRP levels (>3.0 mg/L) did not significantly differ among the EM, CM, and control groups (3.4% [6/174] vs. 2.1% [4/191] vs. 0.0% [0/50], = 0.876). Multivariable regression analyses revealed that CRP levels were not significantly associated with headache frequency per month (β = -0.076, = 0.238), the severity of anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score, β = 0.143, = 0.886), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, β = 0.143, = 0.886). Further, CRP levels did not significantly differ according to clinical characteristics, fibromyalgia, medication overuse, preventive treatment, and classes of preventive treatment medications. Among participants with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m, the CRP levels in EM ( = 41) and CM ( = 17) were numerically higher than those in the control ( = 6) (1.30 [0.28-4.25] mg/L vs. 1.10 [0.50-3.15] mg/L vs. 0.40 [0.15-0.83] mg/L, = 0.249) but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The interictal CRP level is not likely to be a biomarker for EM or CM.

摘要

目的

发作性偏头痛(EM)和慢性偏头痛(CM)患者的某些偏头痛生物标志物水平存在差异,但关于EM和CM中C反应蛋白(CRP)水平的信息相互矛盾。因此,本研究旨在评估EM和CM患者与健康对照者的CRP水平。

方法

通过高敏CRP检测评估174例EM女性患者、191例CM女性患者和50例健康对照者的血浆CRP水平。

结果

结果显示,EM组、CM组和对照组的CRP水平无显著差异(中位数和四分位间距,0.40[0.15 - 0.70]mg/L对0.40[0.15 - 1.00]mg/L对0.15[0.15 - 0.90]mg/L,P = 0.991)。CRP水平升高(>3.0mg/L)的个体比例在EM组、CM组和对照组之间无显著差异(3.4%[6/174]对2.1%[4/191]对0.0%[0/50],P = 0.876)。多变量回归分析显示,CRP水平与每月头痛频率(β = -0.076,P = 0.238)、焦虑严重程度(广泛性焦虑障碍-7评分,β = 0.143,P = 0.886)和抑郁(患者健康问卷-9评分,β = 0.143,P = 0.886)均无显著相关性。此外,根据临床特征、纤维肌痛、药物过度使用、预防性治疗及预防性治疗药物类别,CRP水平无显著差异。在体重指数≥25kg/m²的参与者中,EM组(n = 41)和CM组(n = 17)的CRP水平在数值上高于对照组(n = 6)(1.30[0.28 - 4.25]mg/L对1.10[0.50 - 3.15]mg/L对0.40[0.15 - 0.83]mg/L,P = 0.249)但未达到统计学意义。

结论

发作间期CRP水平不太可能是EM或CM的生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b822/9597506/ae05ddd802eb/fneur-13-1021065-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验