• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独居但不孤单:社区居住的无亲密家庭老年人群体的社会和帮助网络研究。

Solo but Not Alone: An Examination of Social and Help Networks among Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Close Family.

机构信息

School of Medicine, 1371Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

145753Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Mar;42(3):419-426. doi: 10.1177/07334648221135588. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1177/07334648221135588
PMID:36314463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9957792/
Abstract

This study evaluates help sources for personal and health tasks of adults living in the community without a spouse or nearby children. Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and over, we conducted a population-based study of 2998 community-dwelling adults who received assistance with personal, household, or medical tasks in the past month. Using ANOVA, we compared adults aging solo to those with spouses at home and/or children in the same state. Adults aging solo were significantly more likely to identify non-child/spouse family, friends, neighbors and paid aides as part of their social networks. Their sources of unpaid help included siblings (33%), friends (32%), and non-family (e.g., neighbors (23%)). Adults aging solo were more likely to use paid caregivers, despite having lower incomes than married peers. Interventions to support adults aging solo should incorporate diverse social/help networks.

摘要

本研究评估了无配偶或无子女的社区居住成年人在个人和健康方面的帮助来源。本研究使用了来自全国健康老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)的数据,该研究是一项针对 Medicare 受益人的全国代表性样本,年龄在 65 岁及以上。我们对 2998 名过去一个月接受过个人、家庭或医疗任务帮助的社区居住成年人进行了一项基于人群的研究。使用方差分析,我们将独自衰老的成年人与家中有配偶和/或子女的成年人进行了比较。独自衰老的成年人更有可能将非子女/配偶的家庭成员、朋友、邻居和付费助手视为其社交网络的一部分。他们获得的无偿帮助包括兄弟姐妹(33%)、朋友(32%)和非家庭成员(如邻居(23%))。尽管独自衰老的成年人的收入低于已婚同龄人,但他们更有可能使用付费护理人员。支持独自衰老的成年人的干预措施应该纳入多样化的社交/帮助网络。

相似文献

1
Solo but Not Alone: An Examination of Social and Help Networks among Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Close Family.独居但不孤单:社区居住的无亲密家庭老年人群体的社会和帮助网络研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Mar;42(3):419-426. doi: 10.1177/07334648221135588. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Living in the Community With Dementia: Who Receives Paid Care?与痴呆症患者一起生活在社区中:谁接受付费护理?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):186-191. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16215. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Use of Paid and Unpaid Personal Help by Medicare Beneficiaries Needing Long-Term Services and Supports.需要长期服务和支持的医疗保险受益人的有偿和无偿个人帮助的使用情况。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Nov 1;2017:1-9.
4
Paid Help and Caregiving Experiences of Black Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.黑人社区居住的老年人护理者的有偿帮助和护理经历。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;46(1):91-100. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2099776. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Estimating paid and unpaid hours of personal assistance services in activities of daily living provided to adults living at home.估算为居家成年人提供的日常生活活动中个人协助服务的有偿和无偿时长。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):397-415. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.029.
6
Paid Caregivers in the Community-based Dementia Care Team: Do Family Caregivers Benefit?社区痴呆照护团队中的付费护工:家庭护工是否受益?
Clin Ther. 2021 Jun;43(6):930-941. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Family and Other Unpaid Caregivers and Older Adults with and without Dementia and Disability.有或没有痴呆症及残疾的老年人的家庭及其他无薪照料者
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1821-1828. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14910. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Functional Decline Over Time and Change in Family and Other Unpaid Care Provided to Community-Dwelling Older Adults Living With and Without Dementia.随着时间的推移,功能衰退与为居住在社区的患有和未患有痴呆症的老年患者提供家庭和其他无酬护理的变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Oct 9;78(10):1727-1734. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad107.
9
Home alone or connected: Caregiver communication and training from health providers.独自在家或联网:卫生提供者的看护者沟通和培训。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Feb;72(2):361-368. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18686. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
10
Homebound Status and the Critical Role of Caregiving Support.居家状态和护理支持的关键作用。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(6):590-603. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1628625. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and Non-traditional Caregivers Define "Family" and Caregiving Obligations.传统和非传统照顾者对“家庭”和照顾义务的定义。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2025 Jan-Dec;40:15333175251357328. doi: 10.1177/15333175251357328. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
A critical examination of 'family' caregiving at the end of life in contexts of homelessness: Key concepts and future considerations.对无家可归背景下临终时“家庭”照料的批判性审视:关键概念与未来考量
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 May 13;19:26323524251336765. doi: 10.1177/26323524251336765. eCollection 2025.
3
Confidants and Caregivers: Network Multiplexity and Subjective Well-Being of Older Adults.知己与照料者:老年人的网络多元性与主观幸福感。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae164.
4
"How do You Take that Much Time for One Person's Life?" Experiences of Dementia Caregivers Who are Not Immediate Family.“你怎么能为一个人的生命花费那么多时间?”非直系亲属痴呆症照料者的经历
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):166-175. doi: 10.1177/07334648241265197. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Leveraging Existing Datasets to Advance Family Caregiving Research: Opportunities to Measure What Matters.利用现有数据集推进家庭护理研究:衡量重要事项的机会。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):562-580. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2320043. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Proactive Care-Seeking Strategies Among Adults Aging Solo With Early Dementia: A Qualitative Study.独居且早期患有痴呆症的成年人的主动寻求护理策略:一项定性研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 May 1;79(5). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae020.
7
A Care Paradox: The Relationship Between Older Adults' Caregiving Arrangements and Institutionalization and Mortality.一个关怀悖论:老年人的照顾安排与机构化和死亡率之间的关系。
Res Aging. 2024 Aug-Sep;46(7-8):363-385. doi: 10.1177/01640275241229416. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
Family Ties and Older Adult Well-Being: Incorporating Social Networks and Proximity.家庭关系与老年个体幸福感:融入社会网络与空间接近度。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Dec 6;78(12):2080-2089. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad139.
9
The Care Gap in Later Life Across European Countries.欧洲各国晚年生活中的照护差距。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Nov 14;78(11):1935-1946. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad118.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Isolation, Social Support, and Loneliness Profiles Before and After Spousal Death and the Buffering Role of Financial Resources.配偶死亡前后的社会隔离、社会支持和孤独状况以及经济资源的缓冲作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 5;77(5):956-971. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac039.
2
Size and composition of family networks of decedents: A nationwide register-based study.死者家庭网络的规模和构成:一项全国范围内基于登记的研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;35(9):1652-1662. doi: 10.1177/0269216321998602. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Caregiver support and place of death among older adults.照顾者支持与老年人的死亡地点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1221-1230. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17055. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Estimated Prevalence of Elder Orphans Using National Health and Aging Trends Study.使用国家健康老龄化趋势研究估计老年孤儿的患病率。
J Aging Health. 2020 Dec;32(10):1443-1449. doi: 10.1177/0898264320932382. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Marriage Status Predicts Hospital Outcomes Following Orthopedic Trauma.婚姻状况可预测骨科创伤后的医院治疗结果。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Jan 22;11:2151459319898648. doi: 10.1177/2151459319898648. eCollection 2020.
6
Informal Caregiving and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Population-Based Studies.非正规照料与全因死亡率:基于人群的纵向研究的荟萃分析。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Jul;40(7):781-791. doi: 10.1177/0733464819893603. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
7
Work-Related Opportunity Costs Of Providing Unpaid Family Care In 2013 And 2050.2013 年和 2050 年提供无偿家庭护理的工作相关机会成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):1003-1010. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00008.
8
Association of social worker-assessed psychosocial factors with 30-day hospital readmissions among hemodialysis patients.社会工作人员评估的心理社会因素与血液透析患者 30 天内再入院的关系。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Dec 17;19(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1162-4.
9
Kinlessness Around the World.全球无亲属现象
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Oct 4;74(8):1394-1405. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby138.
10
Is Living Alone "Aging Alone"? Solitary Living, Network Types, and Well-Being.独居就是“孤独终老”吗?独居生活、社交网络类型和幸福感。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Oct 4;74(8):1406-1415. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby119.