Department of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China.
Key Laboratory on Assisted Circulation Ministry of Health Guangzhou China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov;11(21):e027386. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027386. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
Background The change of cardiovascular health (CVH) status has been associated with risk of cardiovascular disease. However, no studies have explored the change patterns of CVH in relation to risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). We aim to examine the link between baseline CVH and change of CVH over time with the risk of SCD. Methods and Results Analyses were conducted in the prospective cohort ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study, started in 1987 to 1989. ARIC enrolled 15 792 individuals 45 to 64 years of age from 4 US communities (Forsyth County, North Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi; suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland). Subjects with 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 7 ideal metrics of CVH were categorized as having poor, intermediate, or ideal CVH, respectively. Change in CVH over 6 years between 1987 to 1989 and 1993 to 1995 was considered. The primary study outcome was physician adjudicated SCD. The study population consisted of 15 026 subjects, of whom 12 207 had data about CVH change. Over a median follow-up of 23.0 years, 583 cases of SCD were recorded. There was a strong inverse association between baseline CVH metrics and time varying CVH metrics with risk of SCD. Compared with subjects with consistently poor CVH, risk of SCD was lower in those changed from poor to intermediate/ideal (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48-0.94]), intermediate to poor (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.54-0.99]), intermediate to ideal (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.99]), ideal to poor/intermediate CVH (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.10-0.52]), or those with consistently intermediate (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.36-0.66]) or consistently ideal CVH (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.76]). Similar results were also observed for non-SCD. Conclusions Compared with consistently poor CVH, other patterns of change in CVH were associated with lower risk of SCD. These findings highlight the importance of promotion of ideal CVH in the primordial prevention of SCD.
心血管健康 (CVH) 状况的变化与心血管疾病的风险相关。然而,尚无研究探讨 CVH 随时间的变化与心源性猝死 (SCD) 风险之间的关系。我们旨在研究基线 CVH 与随时间 CVH 变化与 SCD 风险之间的关系。
在前瞻性队列 ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险)研究中进行了分析,该研究于 1987 年至 1989 年开始。ARIC 招募了来自美国 4 个社区(北卡罗来纳州福赛斯县、密西西比州杰克逊、明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯郊区和马里兰州华盛顿县)的 15792 名年龄在 45 至 64 岁的个体。将 CVH 的 0 至 2、3 至 4 和 5 至 7 个理想指标分别归类为 CVH 较差、中等或理想。考虑了 1987 年至 1989 年和 1993 年至 1995 年之间 6 年的 CVH 变化。主要研究结果是医生判定的 SCD。研究人群包括 15026 名受试者,其中 12207 名受试者有 CVH 变化数据。在中位数为 23.0 年的随访期间,记录了 583 例 SCD。基线 CVH 指标与随时间变化的 CVH 指标与 SCD 风险之间存在很强的负相关关系。与持续 CVH 较差的患者相比,从 CVH 较差转变为中等/理想(危险比[HR],0.67 [95%CI,0.48-0.94])、从中等转变为较差(HR,0.73 [95%CI,0.54-0.99])、从中等转变为理想(HR,0.49 [95%CI,0.24-0.99])、从理想转变为较差/中等(HR,0.23 [95%CI,0.10-0.52])、或那些持续中等(HR,0.49 [95%CI,0.36-0.66])或持续理想 CVH(HR,0.31 [95%CI,0.13-0.76])的患者,SCD 风险较低。非 SCD 也观察到类似的结果。
与持续较差的 CVH 相比,CVH 变化的其他模式与 SCD 风险降低相关。这些发现强调了促进理想 CVH 在 SCD 一级预防中的重要性。