• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections in hospitalized US veterans.美国住院退伍军人中碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)血流感染的抗生素治疗的比较有效性
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Oct 26;4(5):dlac106. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac106. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药血流感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0260321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02603-21. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: A retrospective cohort study.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦单独或联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Nov;64(5):107321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107321. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Assessment of Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Effective Antimicrobial Regimens for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant .碳青霉烯类耐药菌引起的血流感染的死亡率相关风险因素评估和有效抗菌治疗方案。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e0069821. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00698-21.
5
Clinical Experience with Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Other than Carbapenem-Resistant .头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗耐碳青霉烯类以外的多重耐药革兰阴性菌感染的临床经验
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Feb 9;9(2):71. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020071.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.实体器官移植受者中耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌血流感染的临床转归和危险因素。
Transplantation. 2023 Jan 1;107(1):254-263. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004265. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
7
Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Infections.美罗培南-维巴坦与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02313-19.
8
The Monte Carlo Simulation of Three Antimicrobials for Empiric Treatment of Adult Bloodstream Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in China.中国三种抗菌药物对耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌所致成人血流感染进行经验性治疗的蒙特卡洛模拟
Front Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;12:738812. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.738812. eCollection 2021.
9
Bloodstream infections due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in hematological patients: assessment of risk factors for mortality and treatment options.血液病患中具抗药性碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌引发血流感染:死亡率风险因素评估与治疗选择。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2023 May 18;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12941-023-00586-y.
10
Effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与黏菌素治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科菌血症的疗效比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;109:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.079. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Therapy Duration for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: An Evidence-Based Review.耐多药革兰氏阴性菌感染的抗生素治疗疗程:一项基于证据的综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 18;26(14):6905. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146905.
2
Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: A retrospective cohort study.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦单独或联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Nov;64(5):107321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107321. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).美国传染病学会关于产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科(ESBL-E)、耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科(CRE)和治疗困难的耐药铜绿假单胞菌(DTR-P. aeruginosa)的治疗指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):e169-e183. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1478.
2
Needs assessment for novel Gram-negative antibiotics in US hospitals: a retrospective cohort study.美国医院新型革兰氏阴性抗生素需求评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1172-1181. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30153-5. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Pharmacoepidemiology of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Use: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 210 US Hospitals.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的药物流行病学:210 家美国医院的回顾性队列分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):611-621. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa061.
4
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology.耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌:新型抗菌药物时代及酶学不断演变背景下的治疗考量
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Feb 7;22(3):6. doi: 10.1007/s11908-020-0716-3.
5
Estimating the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in the United States Using Antibiotic Prescription Data.利用抗生素处方数据估算美国耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌感染的治疗情况
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 28;6(8):ofz344. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz344. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Effect of varying federal definitions on prevalence and characteristics associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in veterans with spinal cord injury.不同联邦定义对脊髓损伤退伍军人中碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科的流行情况及相关特征的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Feb;47(2):175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
Association Between Carbapenem Resistance and Mortality Among Adult, Hospitalized Patients With Serious Infections Due to : Results of a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.碳青霉烯类耐药与成年住院重症感染患者死亡率之间的关联:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析的结果
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 28;5(7):ofy150. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy150. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
Clinical and Mortality Risk Factors in Bloodstream Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌血流感染的临床及死亡风险因素
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017;2017:6212910. doi: 10.1155/2017/6212910. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam as alternative to carbapenems for ICU patients.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦作为重症监护病房患者碳青霉烯类药物的替代用药
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0334-x.
10
Colistin Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.多黏菌素与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):163-171. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix783.

美国住院退伍军人中碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)血流感染的抗生素治疗的比较有效性

Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections in hospitalized US veterans.

作者信息

Wilson Geneva M, Fitzpatrick Margaret A, Suda Katie J, Smith Bridget M, Gonzalez Beverly, Jones Makoto, Schweizer Marin L, Evans Martin, Evans Charlesnika T

机构信息

Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Oct 26;4(5):dlac106. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac106. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlac106
PMID:36320448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9596539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (CRE-BSI) increase mortality three-fold compared with carbapenem-susceptible bloodstream infections. Because these infections are rare, there is a paucity of information on mortality associated with different treatment regimens. This study examines treatment regimens and association with in-hospital, 30 day and 1 year mortality risk for patients with CRE-BSI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified hospitalized patients within the Veteran Affairs (VA) from 2013 to 2018 with a positive CRE blood culture and started antibiotic treatment within 5 days of culture. Primary outcomes were in-hospital, 30 day and 1 year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were healthcare costs at 30 days and 1 year and infection 6 weeks post culture date. The propensity for receiving each treatment regimen was determined. Multivariable regression assessed the association between treatment and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 393 hospitalized patients from 2013 to 2018 included in the study. The cohort was male (97%) and elderly (mean age 71.0 years). Carbapenems were the most prescribed antibiotics (47%). In unadjusted analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam was associated with a lower likelihood of 30 day and 1 year mortality. After adjusting, ceftazidime/avibactam had a 30 day mortality OR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.17-1.02). No difference was found in incidence at 6 weeks post-infection or total costs at 30 days or 1 year post culture date by any treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized veterans with CRE-BSI, none of the treatments were shown to be associated with all-cause mortality. Ceftazidime/avibactam trended towards protectiveness against 30 day and 1 year all-cause mortality. Use of ceftazidime/avibactam should be encouraged for treatment of CRE-BSI.

摘要

背景

与碳青霉烯类药物敏感的血流感染相比,耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌血流感染(CRE-BSI)使死亡率增加两倍。由于这些感染较为罕见,关于不同治疗方案相关死亡率的信息匮乏。本研究探讨了CRE-BSI患者的治疗方案及其与住院期间、30天和1年死亡风险的关联。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究确定了2013年至2018年退伍军人事务部(VA)内住院的患者,这些患者CRE血培养呈阳性且在培养后5天内开始抗生素治疗。主要结局是住院期间、30天和1年的全因死亡率。次要结局是30天和1年的医疗费用以及培养日期后6周的感染情况。确定了接受每种治疗方案的倾向。多变量回归评估了治疗与结局之间的关联。

结果

2013年至2018年共有393名住院患者纳入研究。该队列以男性为主(97%)且年龄较大(平均年龄71.0岁)。碳青霉烯类药物是最常开具的抗生素(47%)。在未调整分析中,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与30天和1年死亡率较低的可能性相关。调整后,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的30天死亡率OR为0.42(95%CI 0.17 - 1.02)。在感染后6周的发病率或培养日期后30天或1年的总成本方面,任何治疗均未发现差异。

结论

在患有CRE-BSI的住院退伍军人中,没有一种治疗方法显示与全因死亡率相关。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在预防30天和1年全因死亡率方面有一定趋势。应鼓励使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗CRE-BSI。