Suppr超能文献

一项关于气味愉悦评分与个体气味觉察阈关系的研究。

A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Recherches Intégratives en Neurosciences et Psychologie Cognitive - UR481, University of Franche-Comté, 25000, Besançon, France.

CSGA Centre des Sciences du Gout et de l'AlimentationCSGA Centre des Sciences du Gout et de l'Alimentation, University of Franche-Comté, 21000, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23068-1.

Abstract

Odor hedonic perception (pleasant/unpleasant character) is considered as the first and one of the most prominent dimensions in olfaction and is known to depend on several parameters. Among them, the relation between the odorant concentration and the hedonic estimation has been widely studied. However, few studies have considered odor hedonic ratings (OHR) in relation to individual detection thresholds (IDT). Thus, the aim of this study was to determine olfactory detection thresholds and to describe hedonic rating variations from individual thresholds to higher concentrations. IDT were performed for two pleasant (apple and jasmine) and two unpleasant (durian and trimethylamine) odorant stimuli. The experimenter presented one by one in a randomized order, the different odorant concentrations above IDT. Participants rated odor hedonic valence of these stimuli on a visual analog scale. Results showed, except for trimethylamine, the same relationship between hedonic ratings and stimulus concentration, i.e., an increase of pleasantness (apple and jasmine)/unpleasantness (durian) ratings at low and middle concentrations followed by a plateau at high concentrations. Correlations between OHR and concentrations as well as between OHR and threshold steps were always significant. Moreover, comparisons between both conditions showed that the correlation coefficient was significantly higher for trimethylamine (and a trend for apple) when IDTs were considered, while no difference was found for jasmine and durian. Overall, results suggested that the relationship between OHR and IDT is odor specific. These findings contribute to explain the large variability of the hedonic tone (i.e., weakly vs. very pleasant, weakly vs. very unpleasant) at specific concentration in the general population and could serve future research in this field (e.g., olfactory preferences in nutrition studies, anhedonia in psychiatric disorders…).

摘要

气味愉悦感知(愉快/不愉快特征)被认为是嗅觉的第一个也是最显著的维度之一,并且已知它取决于几个参数。其中,气味浓度与愉悦评估之间的关系已得到广泛研究。然而,很少有研究考虑到与个体检测阈值(IDT)相关的气味愉悦评分(OHR)。因此,本研究的目的是确定嗅觉检测阈值,并描述从个体阈值到更高浓度的愉悦评分变化。对两种令人愉悦的(苹果和茉莉)和两种不愉快的(榴莲和三甲胺)气味刺激物进行了 IDT 测试。实验者以随机顺序逐一呈现高于 IDT 的不同气味浓度。参与者在视觉模拟量表上对这些刺激物的气味愉悦效价进行评分。结果表明,除了三甲胺,愉悦评分和刺激浓度之间存在相同的关系,即在低浓度和中浓度时,愉悦感(苹果和茉莉)/不愉快感(榴莲)评分增加,然后在高浓度时达到平台。OHR 与浓度之间以及 OHR 与阈值步之间的相关性始终显著。此外,两种条件之间的比较表明,当考虑 IDT 时,OHR 与浓度之间的相关系数对于三甲胺(对于苹果呈趋势)显著更高,而对于茉莉和榴莲则没有差异。总体而言,结果表明 OHR 与 IDT 的关系是气味特异性的。这些发现有助于解释在一般人群中特定浓度下愉悦音调(即微弱愉悦与非常愉悦,微弱不愉快与非常不愉快)的巨大变异性,并且可以为该领域的未来研究提供参考(例如,营养研究中的嗅觉偏好,精神病障碍中的快感缺失等)。

相似文献

1
A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold.
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23068-1.
2
How pleasant and unpleasant stimuli combine in different brain regions: odor mixtures.
J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 5;27(49):13532-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3337-07.2007.
3
Odor hedonic capacity and anhedonia in schizophrenia and unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients.
Schizophr Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):59-67. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr050. Epub 2011 May 26.
4
Diet and odor hedonic ratings: comparative study between vegetarians, flexitarians, and omnivores.
Nutr Neurosci. 2023 Dec;26(12):1232-1242. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2145425. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Variability in odor hedonic perception: A challenge for neurosensory and behavioral research.
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;138(5):301-313. doi: 10.1037/bne0000595. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness.
Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):301-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq129. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
8
Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0259-z. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
9
Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters.
Chem Senses. 1997 Jun;22(3):237-48. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.3.237.
10
Sex differences in hedonic judgement of odors in schizophrenia cases and healthy controls.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.058. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Odor Hedonic Profile (OHP): a self-rating tool of everyday odors.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 4;17:1181674. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1181674. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Hedonic perception of odors in children aged 5-8 years is similar across 18 countries: Preliminary data.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;157:111129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111129. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures.
Curr Biol. 2022 May 9;32(9):2061-2066.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.062. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Sex Differences in Odor Hedonic Perception: An Overview.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 18;15:764520. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.764520. eCollection 2021.
5
A Multisensory Deficit in the Perception of Pleasantness in Parkinson's Disease.
J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(4):2035-2045. doi: 10.3233/JPD-212812.
6
Olfactory shifts linked to postpartum depression.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94556-z.
7
Olfactory Perception in Relation to the Physicochemical Odor Space.
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 28;11(5):563. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050563.
8
Global study of variability in olfactory sensitivity.
Behav Neurosci. 2020 Oct;134(5):394-406. doi: 10.1037/bne0000378.
9
Age differences in olfactory affective responses: evidence for a positivity effect and an emotional dedifferentiation.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 Jul;28(4):570-583. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1799926. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
A network model of affective odor perception.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236468. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验