Suppr超能文献

气味享乐度:通过自主神经参数估计与情绪反应的关联。

Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters.

作者信息

Alaoui-Ismaïli O, Vernet-Maury E, Dittmar A, Delhomme G, Chanel J

机构信息

Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, CNRS, Equipe Emotion-Cognition, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 1997 Jun;22(3):237-48. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.3.237.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship between self-report hedonic evaluations and the physiological expression of emotion in response to odorants. We try to solve the following questions: (1) Is it possible to find any experimental evidence that the sense of smell is linked with emotion? (2) What kind of odorants can be distinguished by autonomic analysis? (3) Is there a link between hedonics and autonomic information? The effects of odorants on the emotional process were estimated, in terms of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. Fifteen subjects inhaled five odorants as olfactory stimuli: lavender (LAV), ethyl acetoacetate (EAA), camphor (CAM), acetic acid (AA) and butyric acid (BA). After inhaling the odorant, subjects were requested to fill out an 11-point hedonic scale to rate its pleasantness versus unpleasantness. ANS parameters were as follows: two electrodermal responses, skin potential (SP) and resistance (SR); two thermovascular parameters, skin blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST); and two cardiorespiratory parameters; instantaneous respiratory frequency (IRF) and instantaneous heart rate (IHR). Simultaneous recording of six parameters showed that specific autonomic patterns were associated with each odorant. An analysis of variance made it possible to differentiate among the five odorants. Two-by-two odorant comparisons for autonomic responses using Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test only permitted differentiation between pleasant odorants (LAV and EAA) and unpleasant (AA and BA) ones, but camphor was differentiated from both pleasant and unpleasant odorants. Each odorant elicited responses in the different parameters, yet subjects responded through their preferential channels; an average of two channels was used by each subject. These results when compared with those obtained with other senses (visual and auditory), did not evidence the postulated preferential link between olfaction and emotion. A strong link between hedonics and ANS response could be demonstrated when considering each subject and mainly through his/her preferential channel(s); conversely a weak correlation (SR duration excepted) was obtained between inter-subjects' hedonic evaluation. It seems that for a given population the autonomic response reflect the odor valence only through some parameters related to the main preferential channel(s) and thus the global autonomic pattern has to be considered.

摘要

本文旨在分析自我报告的享乐评价与对气味剂产生情绪的生理表现之间的关系。我们试图解决以下问题:(1)是否有可能找到任何实验证据表明嗅觉与情绪有关?(2)通过自主分析可以区分哪些类型的气味剂?(3)享乐主义与自主信息之间是否存在联系?根据自主神经系统(ANS)的活动来评估气味剂对情绪过程的影响。15名受试者吸入五种气味剂作为嗅觉刺激物:薰衣草(LAV)、乙酰乙酸乙酯(EAA)、樟脑(CAM)、乙酸(AA)和丁酸(BA)。吸入气味剂后,要求受试者填写11点享乐量表以对其愉悦程度与不愉悦程度进行评分。ANS参数如下:两个皮肤电反应,皮肤电位(SP)和电阻(SR);两个热血管参数,皮肤血流量(SBF)和皮肤温度(ST);以及两个心肺参数,瞬时呼吸频率(IRF)和瞬时心率(IHR)。对六个参数的同步记录表明,特定的自主模式与每种气味剂相关联。方差分析使得区分这五种气味剂成为可能。使用Tukey's HSD多重比较检验对自主反应进行两两气味剂比较,仅能区分愉悦气味剂(LAV和EAA)与不愉悦气味剂(AA和BA),但樟脑与愉悦和不愉悦气味剂均有区别。每种气味剂在不同参数中引发反应,但受试者通过其偏好的通道做出反应;每个受试者平均使用两个通道。将这些结果与通过其他感官(视觉和听觉)获得的结果进行比较时,并未证明嗅觉与情绪之间存在假定的优先联系。当考虑每个受试者并主要通过其偏好的通道时,可以证明享乐主义与ANS反应之间存在强烈联系;相反,受试者之间的享乐评价之间存在较弱的相关性(除SR持续时间外)。似乎对于给定的人群,自主反应仅通过与主要偏好通道相关的一些参数反映气味效价,因此必须考虑整体自主模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验