Pelvic stability during simulated total hip arthroplasty motions: Comparing different hip positioners.

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires forceful maneuvers that can cause the pelvis to shift from its original position. Various methods for stabilizing the pelvis in the lateral decubitus position exist, but there is limited data quantifying the relative stability of each hip positioner. We sought to quantify the pelvic movement that occurred in four commercially available hip positioners during surgeon induced motion of the hip.

METHODS

An infrared marker was attached to the ilium of a cadaver secured in the lateral decubitus position. Four commercially available hip positioners were used for positioning: Beanbag, Pegboard, Stulberg, and ExactFit. Rotation and translation was captured using an infrared marker and camera system while the hip was moved through six motions (Flexion, Extension, Internal Rotation, External Rotation, Push, and Pull).

RESULTS

The Beanbag had the greatest amount of rotation and translation of the pelvis, with maximum hip rotation of 41.5°. The Stulberg and Pegboard positioners showed intermediate stability, with a maximum rotation of 7.8° and 17.1°, respectively. The ExactFit hip positioner resulted in the least amount of motion of the pelvis, with a maximum rotation of the pelvis of up to 3.2°. Of the simulated motions performed, internal rotation and flexion of the hip led to the greatest changes in pelvic rotation and translation.

CONCLUSION

The ExactFit positioner was associated with the smallest amount of pelvic motion during simulated motions of hip arthroplasty, followed by the Stulberg, Pegboard, and Beanbag positioners. Further studies are required to correlate this information with clinical outcomes following total hip arthroplasty.