Nijs Jan, Miserez Marc, Meylemans Diederik, Tollens Tim
Department of General Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
Surg Technol Int. 2022 Nov 15;41:189-196. doi: 10.52198/22.STI.41.HR1626.
Patient satisfaction after inguinal hernia surgery is currently underappreciated and not as well studied as other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on this topic. This study aims to review the literature and summarize available data.
A literature review was conducted using Medline with focus on patient-reported satisfaction after elective, inguinal hernia surgery in adults. All inguinal hernia repair techniques were considered. Small sample sizes and short follow-up periods were excluded. The methodology and results of the remaining articles were reviewed. Due to heterogeneity of reporting between articles, only a descriptive analysis was performed.
The available data from patient-reported outcome measures regarding satisfaction yields considerable heterogeneity and lacks validation. We found that 53% of all included studies used an asymmetrical response questionnaire. Although there is an overwhelming positive patient satisfaction, wide ranges of satisfaction were seen (78-100% more than averagely satisfied, compared to 0-15% less than averagely satisfied). The number of patients not willing to undergo inguinal hernia repair again ranges from 1-16%.
Our study demonstrates that patient-reported satisfaction after inguinal hernia surgery is not uniformly surveyed and remains unvalidated. Further research on patient-reported satisfaction would benefit from the reported raw data of a standardised, validated, and symmetrical five-point Likert or 11-point NRS scale on regular intervals pre- and postoperatively.
目前,腹股沟疝修补术后的患者满意度尚未得到充分重视,对此主题的研究也不如其他患者报告结局指标(PROMs)那样深入。本研究旨在回顾文献并总结现有数据。
使用Medline进行文献综述,重点关注成人择期腹股沟疝修补术后患者报告的满意度。所有腹股沟疝修补技术均在考虑范围内。排除样本量小和随访期短的研究。对其余文章的方法和结果进行了综述。由于各文章报告的异质性,仅进行了描述性分析。
患者报告结局指标中有关满意度的现有数据存在相当大的异质性且缺乏验证。我们发现,所有纳入研究中有53%使用了不对称应答问卷。尽管患者满意度总体呈积极态势,但满意度范围差异较大(比平均满意度高78 - 100%,而比平均满意度低则为0 - 15%)。不愿再次接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者比例在1%至16%之间。
我们的研究表明,腹股沟疝修补术后患者报告的满意度调查并不统一,且仍未得到验证。对患者报告满意度的进一步研究将受益于术后定期采用标准化、经过验证的对称五点李克特量表或11点数字评定量表报告的原始数据。