Gijbels Anouk, Schutte Sophie, Esser Diederik, Wopereis Suzan, Gonzales Gerard Bryan, Afman Lydia A
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Research Group Microbiology and Systems Biology, TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Zeist, Netherlands.
Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 13;9:1026213. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1026213. eCollection 2022.
We previously showed that whole-grain wheat (WGW) consumption had beneficial effects on liver fat accumulation, as compared to refined wheat (RW). The mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear.
In this study, we investigated the effects of WGW vs. RW consumption on plasma metabolite levels to explore potential underlying mechanisms of the preventive effect of WGW consumption on liver fat accumulation.
Targeted metabolomics of plasma obtained from a concluded 12-week double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed. Fifty overweight or obese men and women aged 45-70 years with mildly elevated levels of plasma cholesterol were randomized to either 98 g/d of WGW or RW products. Before and after the intervention, a total of 89 fasting plasma metabolite concentrations including acylcarnitines, trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), choline, betaine, bile acids, and signaling lipids were quantified by UPLC-MS/MS. Intrahepatic triglycerides (IHTG) were quantified by H-MRS, and multiple liver markers, including circulating levels of β-hydroxybutyrate, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), serum amyloid A (SAA), and C-reactive protein, were assessed.
The WGW intervention increased plasma concentrations of four out of 52 signaling lipids-lysophosphatidic acid C18:2, lysophosphatidylethanolamine C18:1 and C18:2, and platelet-activating factor C18:2-and decreased concentrations of the signaling lipid lysophosphatidylglycerol C20:3 as compared to RW intervention, although these results were no longer statistically significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Plasma concentrations of the other metabolites that we quantified were not affected by WGW or RW intervention. Changes in the above-mentioned metabolites were not correlated to change in IHTG upon the intervention.
Plasma acylcarnitines, bile acids, and signaling lipids were not robustly affected by the WGW or RW interventions, which makes them less likely candidates to be directly involved in the mechanisms that underlie the protective effect of WGW consumption or detrimental effect of RW consumption on liver fat accumulation.
[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02385149].
我们之前的研究表明,与精制小麦(RW)相比,食用全谷物小麦(WGW)对肝脏脂肪积累具有有益影响。这些影响背后的机制尚不清楚。
在本研究中,我们调查了食用WGW与RW对血浆代谢物水平的影响,以探索食用WGW对肝脏脂肪积累预防作用的潜在机制。
对一项已结束的为期12周的双盲随机对照试验中获得的血浆进行靶向代谢组学分析。50名年龄在45至70岁之间、血浆胆固醇水平轻度升高的超重或肥胖男性和女性被随机分为两组,分别食用98克/天的WGW或RW产品。在干预前后,通过超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)对总共89种空腹血浆代谢物浓度进行定量,这些代谢物包括酰基肉碱、氧化三甲胺(TMAO)、胆碱、甜菜碱、胆汁酸和信号脂质。通过氢磁共振波谱(H-MRS)对肝内甘油三酯(IHTG)进行定量,并评估多种肝脏标志物,包括β-羟基丁酸、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-GT)、血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)和C反应蛋白的循环水平。
与RW干预相比,WGW干预使52种信号脂质中的4种——溶血磷脂酸C18:2、溶血磷脂酰乙醇胺C18:1和C18:2以及血小板活化因子C18:2的血浆浓度升高,而信号脂质溶血磷脂酰甘油C20:3的浓度降低,尽管在错误发现率(FDR)校正后这些结果不再具有统计学意义。我们定量的其他代谢物的血浆浓度未受WGW或RW干预的影响。上述代谢物的变化与干预后IHTG的变化无关。
血浆酰基肉碱、胆汁酸和信号脂质未受到WGW或RW干预的显著影响,这使得它们不太可能直接参与食用WGW对肝脏脂肪积累的保护作用或食用RW的有害作用的潜在机制。
[www.ClinicalTrials.gov],标识符 [NCT02385149]。