• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就诊时间与指南推荐的筛查、诊断和治疗的关系。

Drive Time and Receipt of Guideline-Recommended Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

机构信息

Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40290.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40290
PMID:36331503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636523/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Many patients do not receive recommended services. Drive time to health care services may affect receipt of guideline-recommended care, but this has not been comprehensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between drive time to care and receipt of guideline-recommended screening, diagnosis, and treatment interventions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used administrative data from the National Veterans Health Administration (VA) data merged with Medicare data. Eligible participants were patients using VA services between January 2016 and December 2019. Women ages 65 years or older without underlying bone disease were assessed for osteoporosis screening. Patients with new diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) indicated by at least 2 encounter codes for COPD or at least 1 COPD-related hospitalization were assessed for receipt of diagnostic spirometry. Patients hospitalized for ischemic heart disease were assessed for cardiac rehabilitation treatment.

EXPOSURES

Drive time from each patient's residential address to the closest VA facility where the service was available, measured using geocoded addresses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Binary outcome at the patient level for receipt of osteoporosis screening, spirometry, and cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between drive time and receipt of services.

RESULTS

Of 110 780 eligible women analyzed, 36 431 (32.9%) had osteoporosis screening (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [5.4] years; 19 422 [17.5%] Black, 63 403 [57.2%] White). Of 281 130 patients with new COPD diagnosis, 145 249 (51.7%) had spirometry (mean [SD] age, 68.2 [11.5] years; 268 999 [95.7%] men; 37 834 [13.5%] Black, 217 608 [77.4%] White). Of 73 146 patients hospitalized for ischemic heart disease, 11 171 (15.3%) had cardiac rehabilitation (mean [SD] age, 70.0 [10.8] years; 71 217 [97.4%] men; 15 213 [20.8%] Black, 52 144 [71.3%] White). The odds of receiving recommended services declined as drive times increased. Compared with patients with a drive time of 30 minutes or less, patients with a drive time of 61 to 90 minutes had lower odds of receiving osteoporosis screening (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and spirometry (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.92) while patients with a drive time of 91 to 120 minutes had lower odds of receiving cardiac rehabilitation (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87). Results were similar in analyses restricted to urban patients or patients whose primary care clinic was in a tertiary care center.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective cohort study, longer drive time was associated with less frequent receipt of guideline-recommended services across multiple components of care. To improve quality of care and health outcomes, health systems and clinicians should adopt strategies to mitigate travel burden, even for urban patients.

摘要

重要性

许多患者未接受推荐的服务。前往医疗保健服务的车程时间可能会影响指南推荐的护理的接受情况,但这尚未得到全面研究。

目的

评估前往护理的车程时间与接受指南推荐的筛查、诊断和治疗干预措施之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究使用了国家退伍军人健康管理局(VA)数据与医疗保险数据合并的行政数据。符合条件的参与者是在 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间使用 VA 服务的患者。无潜在骨骼疾病的 65 岁及以上女性接受骨质疏松症筛查。至少有 2 次 COPD 就诊代码或至少有 1 次 COPD 相关住院治疗的新诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者接受诊断性肺量测定。因缺血性心脏病住院的患者接受心脏康复治疗。

暴露

使用患者住宅地址的地理编码地址来衡量每个患者到最近提供服务的 VA 设施的行车时间。

主要结果和测量指标

患者接受骨质疏松症筛查、肺量测定和心脏康复治疗的接受情况的二元结果。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估行车时间与服务接受情况之间的关联。

结果

在分析的 110780 名合格女性中,36431 名(32.9%)接受了骨质疏松症筛查(平均[SD]年龄,66.7[5.4]岁;19422 名[17.5%]黑人,63403 名[57.2%]白人)。在 281130 名新诊断为 COPD 的患者中,145249 名(51.7%)接受了肺量测定(平均[SD]年龄,68.2[11.5]岁;268999 名[95.7%]男性;37834 名[13.5%]黑人,217608 名[77.4%]白人)。在因缺血性心脏病住院的 73146 名患者中,11171 名(15.3%)接受了心脏康复治疗(平均[SD]年龄,70.0[10.8]岁;71217 名[97.4%]男性;15213 名[20.8%]黑人,52144 名[71.3%]白人)。随着行车时间的增加,接受推荐服务的可能性降低。与行车时间在 30 分钟或更短的患者相比,行车时间在 61 到 90 分钟的患者接受骨质疏松症筛查的可能性较低(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.90;95%CI,0.86-0.95)和肺量测定(aOR,0.90;95%CI,0.88-0.92),而行车时间在 91 到 120 分钟的患者接受心脏康复治疗的可能性较低(aOR,0.80;95%CI,0.74-0.87)。在仅限于城市患者或其初级保健诊所位于三级保健中心的患者的分析中,结果相似。

结论和相关性

在这项回顾性队列研究中,较长的行车时间与多项护理服务的推荐服务接受率降低相关。为了改善护理质量和健康结果,医疗系统和临床医生应采取策略来减轻旅行负担,即使对于城市患者也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad54/9636523/bb7496e3ec74/jamanetwopen-e2240290-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad54/9636523/dad578f8194e/jamanetwopen-e2240290-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad54/9636523/bb7496e3ec74/jamanetwopen-e2240290-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad54/9636523/dad578f8194e/jamanetwopen-e2240290-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad54/9636523/bb7496e3ec74/jamanetwopen-e2240290-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Drive Time and Receipt of Guideline-Recommended Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.就诊时间与指南推荐的筛查、诊断和治疗的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40290.
2
Guideline-discordant inhaler regimens after COPD hospitalization: associations with rurality, drive time to care, and fragmented care - a United States cohort study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)住院后不符合指南的吸入治疗方案:与农村地区、就医驾车时间及医疗服务碎片化的关联——一项美国队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Sep 21;26:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100597. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life.终末期 Medicare 受益人群的无创和有创机械通气趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):93-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640.
4
Characteristics Associated with Spirometry Guideline Adherence in VA Patients Hospitalized with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.与 VA 患者因慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院时遵循肺量计指南相关的特征。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07826-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Association of Hospice Payer With Concurrent Receipt of Hospice and Dialysis Among US Veterans With End-stage Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Cohort.美国终末期肾病退伍军人接受临终关怀和透析的同时接受临终关怀支付方的关联:一项全国队列的回顾性分析。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223708. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3708.
6
Beyond Access: Factors Associated With Spirometry Underutilization Among Patients With a Diagnosis of COPD in Urban Tertiary Care Centers.超越获取途径:城市三级医疗中心慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能检查未充分利用的相关因素
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Oct 26;9(4):538-548. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0303.
7
Process and Outcome Measures among COPD Patients with a Hospitalization Cared for by an Advance Practice Provider or Primary Care Physician.由高级执业提供者或初级保健医生照料住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的过程和结果指标
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0148522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148522. eCollection 2016.
8
Factor Analysis of Health Care Access With Ovarian Cancer Surgery and Gynecologic Oncologist Consultation.医疗保健获取的因素分析——以卵巢癌手术和妇科肿瘤专家咨询为例。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254595. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54595.
9
Factors Associated With Low-Value Cancer Screenings in the Veterans Health Administration.与退伍军人健康管理局中低价值癌症筛查相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30581.
10
Diagnosing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans: Veterans Affair's Concordance With Clinical Guidelines for Spirometry Administration.诊断阿富汗和伊拉克退伍军人中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病:退伍军人事务部与肺活量测定管理临床指南的一致性。
Mil Med. 2017 Sep;182(9):e1993-e2000. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00332.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic Disparities by Rural-Urban Status and Drive Time to Care in Tobacco Treatment for COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)烟草治疗中城乡状况及就医驾车时间的地域差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28898.
2
Compound drought and heatwave extreme weather events: Mortality risk in individuals with chronic respiratory disease.复合型干旱和热浪极端天气事件:慢性呼吸道疾病患者的死亡风险
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 May 1;9(3):e389. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000389. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural/urban differences in access to paid sick leave among full-time workers.农村/城市全职工作者享受带薪病假的机会存在差异。
J Rural Health. 2023 Jun;39(3):676-685. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12703. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
Addressing transportation barriers to health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of care coordinators.应对新冠疫情期间医疗保健的交通障碍:护理协调员的观点
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
3
Validation of algorithms to identify elective percutaneous coronary interventions in administrative databases.
2016年至2023年女性退伍军人健康文献证据图谱:一项系统综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256372. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6372.
4
Characterizing Tobacco Use Status among a National Cohort of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.描述全国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者队列中的烟草使用状况。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jun;22(6):944-948. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-659RL.
5
Comorbidities, Tobacco Exposure, and Geography: Added Risk Factors of Heat and Cold Wave-related Mortality among U.S. Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.合并症、烟草暴露与地理位置:美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病退伍军人中与热浪和寒潮相关死亡率的附加风险因素
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Feb;22(2):200-207. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202312-1089OC.
6
Heat and Cold Wave-Related Mortality Risk among United States Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case-Crossover Study.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病退伍军人的热浪和寒潮相关死亡率:病例交叉研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Feb;132(2):27004. doi: 10.1289/EHP13176. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Guideline-discordant inhaler regimens after COPD hospitalization: associations with rurality, drive time to care, and fragmented care - a United States cohort study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)住院后不符合指南的吸入治疗方案:与农村地区、就医驾车时间及医疗服务碎片化的关联——一项美国队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Sep 21;26:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100597. eCollection 2023 Oct.
验证算法以识别行政数据库中的选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0231100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231100. eCollection 2020.
4
Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation With Survival Among US Veterans.美国退伍军人的心脏康复与生存的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1396.
5
Tracking Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Completion Among Medicare Beneficiaries to Inform the Efforts of a National Initiative.追踪医疗保险受益人的心脏康复参与情况和完成情况,为一项全国性倡议的工作提供信息。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jan;13(1):e005902. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005902. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Algorithms to identify COPD in health systems with and without access to ICD coding: a systematic review.算法在有和没有 ICD 编码访问权限的卫生系统中识别 COPD:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4574-3.
7
Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible - The Neighborhood Atlas.让邻里劣势指标易于获取——邻里地图集。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2456-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1802313.
8
Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.骨质疏松症筛查以预防骨折:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2521-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7498.
9
Geographic Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare and Veterans Affairs Populations: Opportunity for Improvement.医疗保险和退伍军人事务人群中心脏康复参与的地域差异:改善的机会。
Circulation. 2018 May 1;137(18):1899-1908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029471. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
10
Outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosed with or without pulmonary function testing.经肺功能测试或未经肺功能测试诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的预后。
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 10;189(14):E530-E538. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151420. Epub 2016 Nov 14.