Tufts University.
Texas A&M University.
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Jun;33(2):656-679. doi: 10.1111/jora.12806. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
Positive youth development (PYD) models are widespread, but the empirical evidence for them is primarily nomothetic (i.e., investigations of universal patterns). Contemporary developmental theory suggests that concepts and processes within PYD models should also be explored with respect to specificity. This study demonstrates how the Five Cs Model, a predominant PYD model, can be advanced using group-differential methods. Secondary data from four studies of adolescents were used to test: (1) Whether there were subgroups who varied in their patterns of scores across the Five Cs, and (2) Whether subgroups also varied in Contribution behaviors. Unexpectedly, the four data sets used could not be combined, yielding an opportunity to discuss consistencies and inconsistencies in findings across the four data sets through contextual and sample differences. Findings demonstrate how understanding specificity in theorized concepts and processes in PYD models can complement studies of universal patterns, which are both necessary to advance PYD research and practice.
积极青年发展(PYD)模型广泛存在,但针对这些模型的实证证据主要是唯名论的(即,对普遍模式的调查)。当代发展理论表明,PYD 模型中的概念和过程也应该根据特殊性进行探索。本研究展示了如何使用群体差异方法来推进占主导地位的 PYD 模型——五 C 模型。使用来自四项青少年研究的二次数据来测试:(1)在五个 C 中,分数模式存在差异的亚组,以及(2)亚组在贡献行为上是否也存在差异。出乎意料的是,四个使用的数据集无法组合,这为通过上下文和样本差异讨论四个数据集的发现中的一致性和不一致性提供了机会。研究结果表明,理解 PYD 模型中理论概念和过程的特殊性如何补充普遍模式的研究,这两者对于推进 PYD 研究和实践都是必要的。