Suppr超能文献

积极青少年发展的全球概况:对生活在21个国家的新兴成年人的以人为本分析。

Global Profiles of Positive Youth Development: A Person-Oriented Analysis among Emerging Adults Living in 21 Countries.

作者信息

Buenconsejo Jet Uy, Ferrer-Wreder Laura, Dimitrova Radosveta, Pavlova Iuliia, Bosnar Ksenija, Bartoluci Sunčica, Katović Darko, Prot Franjo, Sultana Mst Sadia, Islam Md Saiful, Michałek-Kwiecień Justyna, Skrzypińska Katarzyna, Kazmierczak Maria, Lewandowska-Walter Aleksandra, Borchet Judyta, Buzea Carmen, Stefenel Delia, Page Daniel Thomas, Luden Michael Kyle, Jovanović Veljko, Kittieteerasack Priyoth, Stanciu Adrian, Friehs Maria-Therese, Rivera Rita M, Aruta John Jamir Benzon, Bodnar Ivanna, Petrytsa Petro, Andres Andrii, Wendt Guilherme Welter, Thome Luciana Dutra, Yunes Maria Angela Mattar, Giordani Rubia Carla Formighieri, Musso Pasquale, Cassibba Rosalinda, Silletti Fabiola, Miconi Diana, Karakulak Arzu, Yıldırım Ebrar, Martín-Carbonell Marta, Palacio Luz Marina Alonso, Gaete Jorge, Landabur Rodrigo, Chen Bin-Bin, Gan Yiqun, Lin Danhua, Abdul Kadir Nor Ba'yah, Krauss Steven, Ayub Norzihan, Saiful Mohd Saiful Husain, Malik Sadia, Yu Yue, Gantulga Urandelger, Dagvadorj Amarjargal, Ganbaatar Nomin, Altansukh Suvdanchimeg

机构信息

Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02174-z.

Abstract

Although global research on the 5Cs model of Positive Youth Development (PYD; competence, confidence, connection, character, and caring) has expanded in recent years, there is a lack of understanding about distinct and consistent PYD profiles across youth from diverse socio-cultural contexts. To address this gap, this study utilized a person-oriented analytic approach to examine the PYD profiles of 11,481 emerging adults (M = 21.77; SD = 2.74; 68.66% females) from 21 countries in four continents. Results of the multi-group latent profile analysis revealed four consistent profiles of PYD across countries: high/balanced (41%), self-efficacious (28%), socio-emotional (20%), and low/self-centered (11%). Participants' age, gender, educational attainment, and country-level collectivism were also found to be associated with specific profiles. Older and more-educated females from less collectivistic countries were more likely to be in a high/balanced profile, while younger males from more collectivistic countries tend to be in a low/self-centered profile. Older and more-educated males from less collectivistic countries were more likely to be in a self-efficacious profile, while younger and less-educated females from more collectivistic countries tend to be in a socio-emotional profile. Controlling these socio-contextual covariates, the four profiles exhibited distinct relations with adaptive (resilience and contribution) and maladaptive outcomes (anxiety and adverse life experiences) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results highlight the importance of fostering a balanced set of Cs, which include both self-efficacious and socio-emotional qualities, to promote positive adaptation in challenging times across diverse developmental settings.

摘要

尽管近年来关于积极青少年发展(PYD;能力、自信、人际关系、品格和关爱)的5C模型的全球研究有所扩展,但对于来自不同社会文化背景的青少年中独特且一致的PYD概况仍缺乏了解。为了填补这一空白,本研究采用了以人为本的分析方法,对来自四大洲21个国家的11481名新兴成年人(M = 21.77;SD = 2.74;68.66%为女性)的PYD概况进行了研究。多组潜在类别分析的结果显示,各国存在四种一致的PYD概况:高/平衡型(41%)、自我效能型(28%)、社会情感型(20%)和低/自我中心型(11%)。研究还发现,参与者的年龄、性别、教育程度和国家层面的集体主义与特定概况相关。来自集体主义程度较低国家的年龄较大、受教育程度较高的女性更有可能属于高/平衡型,而来自集体主义程度较高国家的年轻男性则倾向于低/自我中心型。来自集体主义程度较低国家的年龄较大、受教育程度较高的男性更有可能属于自我效能型,而来自集体主义程度较高国家的年轻、受教育程度较低的女性则倾向于社会情感型。在控制了这些社会背景协变量后,这四种概况在新冠疫情期间与适应性(复原力和贡献)和适应不良结果(焦虑和不良生活经历)呈现出不同的关系。研究结果凸显了培养一套平衡的“C”的重要性,其中包括自我效能和社会情感品质,以促进在不同发展环境中的挑战性时期实现积极适应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验