Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK.
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Feb;29(4):1037-1053. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16511. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
Gross primary production (GPP) by terrestrial ecosystems is a key quantity in the global carbon cycle. The instantaneous controls of leaf-level photosynthesis are well established, but there is still no consensus on the mechanisms by which canopy-level GPP depends on spatial and temporal variation in the environment. The standard model of photosynthesis provides a robust mechanistic representation for C species; however, additional assumptions are required to "scale up" from leaf to canopy. As a consequence, competing models make inconsistent predictions about how GPP will respond to continuing environmental change. This problem is addressed here by means of an empirical analysis of the light use efficiency (LUE) of GPP inferred from eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements, in situ measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and remotely sensed estimates of the fraction of PAR (fAPAR) absorbed by the vegetation canopy. Focusing on LUE allows potential drivers of GPP to be separated from its overriding dependence on light. GPP data from over 100 sites, collated over 20 years and located in a range of biomes and climate zones, were extracted from the FLUXNET2015 database and combined with remotely sensed fAPAR data to estimate daily LUE. Daytime air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, diffuse fraction of solar radiation, and soil moisture were shown to be salient predictors of LUE in a generalized linear mixed-effects model. The same model design was fitted to site-based LUE estimates generated by 16 terrestrial ecosystem models. The published models showed wide variation in the shape, the strength, and even the sign of the environmental effects on modeled LUE. These findings highlight important model deficiencies and suggest a need to progress beyond simple "goodness of fit" comparisons of inferred and predicted carbon fluxes toward an approach focused on the functional responses of the underlying dependencies.
陆地生态系统的总初级生产力(GPP)是全球碳循环的关键量。叶片水平光合作用的瞬时控制已经得到很好的确立,但对于冠层 GPP 如何依赖环境的时空变化,仍然没有共识。光合作用的标准模型为 C 物种提供了强大的机制表示;然而,需要额外的假设来“从叶片扩展到冠层”。因此,竞争模型对 GPP 将如何应对持续的环境变化做出不一致的预测。通过对涡度协方差二氧化碳通量测量、光合作用有效辐射(PAR)的现场测量和植被冠层吸收的 PAR 分数(fAPAR)的遥感估计推断的 GPP 光能利用效率(LUE)的实证分析,解决了这个问题。关注 LUE 可以将 GPP 的潜在驱动因素与其对光的依赖区分开来。从 FLUXNET2015 数据库中提取了超过 100 个站点、20 多年的 GPP 数据,并结合遥感 fAPAR 数据来估算日 LUE。广义线性混合效应模型表明,日间空气温度、蒸气压亏缺、太阳辐射漫射分数和土壤湿度是 LUE 的重要预测因子。相同的模型设计被应用于 16 个陆地生态系统模型生成的基于站点的 LUE 估计。已发表的模型显示,在模拟 LUE 对环境影响的形状、强度甚至符号方面存在广泛差异。这些发现突出了重要的模型缺陷,并表明需要超越简单的推断和预测碳通量的“拟合优度”比较,朝着关注潜在依赖性的功能响应的方法发展。