Suppr超能文献

一项队列研究考察了在美国 COVID-19 大流行期间,商业保险成年人中酒精使用障碍治疗模式的变化。

A cohort study examining changes in treatment patterns for alcohol use disorder among commercially insured adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478, United States of America; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 15 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2023 Jan;144:108920. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108920. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We know very little about how the pandemic impacted outpatient alcohol use disorder (AUD) care and the role of telemedicine.

METHODS

Using OptumLabs® Data Warehouse de-identified administrative claims, we identified AUD cohorts in 2018 (N = 23,204) and 2019 (N = 23,445) and examined outpatient visits the following year, focusing on week 12, corresponding to the March 2020 US COVID-19 emergency declaration, through week 52. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between patient demographic and clinical characteristics and receipt of any outpatient AUD visits in 2020 vs. 2019.

RESULTS

In 2020, weekly AUD visit utilization decreased maximally at the pandemic start (week 12) by 22.5 % (2019: 3.8 %, 2020: 3.0 %, percentage point change [95 % CI] = -0.86[-1.19, -0.05]) but was similar to 2019 utilization by mid-April 2020 (week 16). Telemedicine accounted for 50.1 % of AUD visits by early July 2020 (week 27). Individual therapy returned to 2019 levels within 1 week (i.e., week 13) whereas group therapy did not consistently do so until mid-August 2020 (week 31). Further, individual therapy exceeded 2019 levels by as much as 50 % starting mid-October 2020. The study found no substantial differences in visits by patient demographic or clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with known AUD, initial outpatient care disruptions were relatively brief. However, substantial shifts occurred in care delivery-an embrace of telemedicine but also more pronounced, longer disruptions in group therapy vs. individual and an increase in individual therapy use. Further research needs to help us understand the implications of these findings for clinical outcomes.

摘要

简介

我们对大流行如何影响门诊酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗以及远程医疗的作用知之甚少。

方法

使用 OptumLabs® Data Warehouse 去识别行政索赔,我们确定了 2018 年(N=23204)和 2019 年(N=23445)的 AUD 队列,并研究了次年的门诊就诊情况,重点关注第 12 周,对应于 2020 年 3 月美国 COVID-19 紧急声明,到第 52 周。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们检查了患者人口统计学和临床特征与 2020 年和 2019 年任何门诊 AUD 就诊之间的关联。

结果

2020 年,在大流行开始时(第 12 周),AUD 就诊利用每周最多减少 22.5%(2019 年:3.8%,2020 年:3.0%,百分点变化[95%置信区间]=-0.86[-1.19,-0.05]),但到 2020 年 4 月中旬(第 16 周)与 2019 年的利用情况相似。到 2020 年 7 月初(第 27 周),远程医疗占 AUD 就诊的 50.1%。个体治疗在 1 周内(即第 13 周)恢复到 2019 年的水平,而团体治疗直到 2020 年 8 月中旬(第 31 周)才始终如此。此外,从 2020 年 10 月中旬开始,个体治疗的利用率甚至超过 2019 年的水平高达 50%。该研究发现,患者人口统计学或临床特征的就诊没有明显差异。

结论

在已知患有 AUD 的患者中,最初的门诊护理中断相对较短。然而,护理提供方式发生了重大转变——远程医疗的采用,但也更明显的是,团体治疗的中断时间更长,个体治疗的使用量增加。需要进一步的研究来帮助我们了解这些发现对临床结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0921/9613781/75c6411f1da7/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验