Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Mitte, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug;273(5):1201-1206. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01508-3. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
This study examines whether climate change-associated environmental stressors, including air and noise pollution, local heat levels, as well as a lack of surrounding greenspace, mediate the effects of local poverty on mental health, using the 28-item General Health Questionnaire. We recruited 478 adults who were representative of eleven of Berlin's inner-city neighborhoods. The relationship of individual-level variables, neighborhood-level sociodemographic and environmental data from the Berlin Senate (Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing) to mental health was assessed in a multilevel model using SPSS. We found that neither local exposure to environmental stressors, nor available greenspace as a protective factor, mediated the effects of local poverty on variance in mental health (all p values > 0.2). However, surrounding greenspace (r = -0.24, p < 0.001), nitrogen dioxide levels (r = 0.10, p < 0.05), noise pollution (rho = 0.15, p < 0.01), and particle pollution (r = 0.12, p < 0.001) were associated with local poverty, which, more strongly than individual factors, accounted for variance in mental health (β = 0.47, p < 0.001). Our analysis indicates that the effects of local poverty on mental health are not mediated by environmental factors. Instead, local poverty was associated with both an increased mental health burden and the exposure to climate-related environmental stressors.
本研究使用 28 项一般健康问卷(General Health Questionnaire),考察了气候变化相关的环境压力源(包括空气和噪音污染、当地热水平以及缺乏周围绿地)是否在当地贫困对心理健康的影响中起到中介作用。我们招募了 478 名成年人,他们来自柏林 11 个内城社区。使用 SPSS 软件,在多层次模型中评估了个体层面变量、柏林参议院(城市发展、建筑和住房部)提供的邻里层面社会人口学和环境数据与心理健康之间的关系。我们发现,无论是个体接触环境压力源,还是周围绿地作为保护因素,都没有在当地贫困对心理健康差异的影响中起到中介作用(所有 p 值均>0.2)。然而,周围绿地(r=-0.24,p<0.001)、二氧化氮水平(r=0.10,p<0.05)、噪音污染(rho=0.15,p<0.01)和颗粒污染(r=0.12,p<0.001)与当地贫困有关,与个体因素相比,这些因素更能解释心理健康的差异(β=0.47,p<0.001)。我们的分析表明,当地贫困对心理健康的影响不受环境因素的中介。相反,当地贫困与心理健康负担的增加以及与气候相关的环境压力源的暴露有关。